I remember telling a friend who was disgruntled with the CPF that we don't really have a choice.
It is like being married and not liking our mother-in-law.
We can kick our mother-in-law in the butt if we divorce our spouse.
We can kick the CPF in the butt if we give up our citizenship.
Fortunately, I rather like my mother-in-law, er, I mean, the CPF.
Some might not have mandatory contributions to the CPF for various reasons and might wonder how the CPF fits in their lives?
Here is one example:
I accidentally came across your blog only this year, find it very sensible & rational. So, I took few weeks to read all your past articles since Day 1 (I think).
We have no intention to fully pay maybe until when we buy our 2nd property
My question is what is the downside to continue doing VC with the ultimate aim to buy 2nd property using CPF (I’ve set aside the Basic Retirement Sum needed in SA)?
I’m confused on paying back CPF & accrued interests part when & if I were to sell the property
Am I worst off when compare those who bought using Cash???
Awaiting your enlightenment
AK:
Welcome to my blog. I am glad you enjoy my muttering and mumbling. ;)
With regards to the CPF, people must remember that it is really meant to help Singaporeans fund our retirement.
However, for people with sufficient cash on hand or other means, especially in an environment of low interest rates, they don't really have to use their CPF savings to purchase their homes.
They should look at their CPF savings as a back up only to be utilised in case they have to. Well, at least that is how I look at it.
There is an opportunity cost to using our CPF money meant for our retirement to purchase real estate whether for own stay or investment.
I would do VCs to my CPF account if I were self employed because I want some sense of financial security in retirement down the road and not really for anything else.
It is very often a matter of perspective.
2. Proposed changes to the CPF system.
3. Buy the biggest/most expensive home?