Do online contribution to Medisave and get $88 Ang Bao.

"For those under 65, the Basic Healthcare Sum next year will be S$54,500, up from S$52,000 previously, the authorities said." Sou...

Past blog posts now load week by week. The old style created a problem for some as the system would load 50 blog posts each time. Hope the new style is better. Search archives in box below.


"E-book" by AK

Second "e-book".

Another free "e-book".

Pageviews since Dec'09


Recent Comments

ASSI's Guest bloggers

ARA: Partial divestment at $1.155.

Friday, October 7, 2011

When I was looking at ARA's chart last night, I decided that I should do a partial divestment. I would sell those shares I bought on 4 Oct, Tuesday.

Why? Volume was relatively thin. Up days accompanied by such thin volume are suspicious.

I decided that there would be resistance at $1.16 because that was the price at the start of two long black candle days and with high volume to boot.

Shareholders who had wanted to divest then but did not do so at $1.16 would remember that price. They would also remember how a low of $1.015 was hit by the close of the next day. That was a whopping 14.5c loss in just two days!

Mr. Market remembers extremes well and would try to divest if $1.16 should be tested. Today, the counter hit a high of $1.165 before closing at $1.15. The resistance at $1.16 was overcome only briefly. Closing at $1.15 means $1.16 is still the resistance to watch for now.

Using Fibo lines, we see that 61.8% approximates $1.18 and this is also where gap close could take place if the resistance at $1.16 could be taken out convincingly. The next higher resistance is at $1.23 as provided by the 50% Fibo line and the declining 20dMA.

Naturally, my next sell order is at $1.18. I could also place another sell order where the declining 20dMA is approximating. However, unless volume should increase meaningfully, it is hard to envisage ARA's share price moving much higher. Volume is, after all, the fuel that drives rallies.

As the MACD is still in negative territory and with no sign of a positive divergence, the shares bought on Tuesday were really for a quick trade on expectations that a rebound would materialise. So, I put in an overnight sell order at $1.155, just one bid below $1.16 where I expected some resistance. This was filled.

Locking in gains with a partial divestment is, I believe, the right thing to do. The counter is in a downtrend and we want to sell at resistance in a downtrend. I think that is what short sellers are waiting to do as well.

Related post:
ARA: A trading buy?

AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: 2Q FY2012.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT has suffered from negative sentiments and from some bigotry in the local investment community, no thanks in part to the acrimonious recapitalisation process of the former MI-REIT.

However, investors who were objective enough to recognise the stronger recapitalised REIT would have enjoyed some rather attractive income in the last two years.

AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT has delivered once again!

1. Distributable income increase 48%, year on year.
2. DPU of 2.5c, payable on 7 Dec 11, has been declared.
3. NAV per unit: $1.365
4. Interest cover ratio: 6.4x.
5. Gearing: 30%.

Although the annualised DPU of 10c (based on this latest set of numbers) will give us a distribution yield of 10.53% at today's closing price of 95c per unit, bear in mind that 20 Gul Way's redevelopment has started in August. This will likely result in lower distributable income in the coming quarters.

For my estimates, please see:
AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: Consolidation and corporate rating.

See 2Q FY2012 results here.

LMIR: Circular to unitholders.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Two days ago, LMIR issued to unitholders a circular regarding the EGM to be held on 20 Oct with regards to the proposed acquisitions of Pluit Village and Medan Fair as well as the proposed 1 for 1 rights issue.

The management provided two sets of numbers, one which looks at FY2010 and another looks at 6M 2011. I would like to be a bit creative with the numbers to determine if LMIR is worth buying into at today's closing price of 45c per unit.

FY2010 had a DPU of 4.44c. If the DPU were to be replicated in FY2011, we would have a distribution yield of 9.87% at today's closing price of 45c per unit.

Taking into consideration the proposed acquisitions and rights issue, the management arrived at a pro forma DPU of 3.54c. At 45c, the TERP (theoretical ex-rights price) would be 45c+31c divided by 2 = 38c. This would provide us with a pro forma distribution yield of 9.32%. Distribution yield accretive? I think not.

More relevant perhaps is to use more recent numbers provided for 6M 2011. This gives a half year DPU of 2.26c which translates to a distribution yield of 10.04% based on today's closing price of 45c per unit.

Taking into consideration the proposed acquisitions and rights issue, the management arrived at a pro forma half year DPU of  1.63c. At the TERP of 38c, we would get a pro forma distribution yield of 8.58%. Again, is this distribution yield accretive? Clearly no.

So, will I subscribe to the rights issue? Although it is not distribution yield accretive, I will subscribe to the rights issue for two reasons:

1. The even lower gearing, post rights, of the REIT will allow more acquistions in future to be funded solely by debt. Another rights issue soon after this is unlikely. Therefore, we are likely to see DPU increase and distribution yield improve, everything else remaining equal. Very likely, this exercise will pave the way for future distribution yield accretion.

2. With a TERP of 38c, the pro forma distribution yield is estimated at 8.58% (using 6M 2011's numbers). This is definitely still very attractive considering what our money will make in a one year S$ fixed deposit now.

For anyone who is investing for income and who would be happy with a distribution yield of 8.5%, buying into LMIR at today's closing price of 45c is a viable option.

Read circular here.

Related post:
LMIR: Will I subscribe to the rights issue?

ARA: A trading buy?

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

I remember reading an article recently in which Warren Buffet said he has his elephant gun ready and will scoop up undervalued companies if they should present themselves. With so much fear in the air and likely to get worse, we should do the same.

Do not feel fearful when there is so much fear in the air. Instead, get ready to load up on cheap stocks which, by the way, could get cheaper.

One company which I am eyeing is ARA Asset Management. By all accounts, this is a great company to invest in but at the right price, of course.

ARA is in a net cash position and has a net profit margin of 53.6% according to its 1H 2011 numbers! Yes, net margin, not gross! It also has a yearly dividend payout of 4.8c per share which seems sustainable.

NextInsight has two recent articles on ARA Asset Management. So, I shan't say more. Read: ARA Asset Management: resilient earnings, super high profit margins and steady dividends.

We have identified a good company to invest in. The question is what is a good price to buy at or when should we start buying?

On 23 Sep, I initiated a long position at $1.22 per share. Then, I said that although ARA is "a fundamentally sound company, its share price could weaken further from here. It might be a good idea to wait for the dust to settle before adding to my newly created long position." See blog post here.

On 26 Sep, I decided to add to my long position at $1.13 and these shares were divested on 29 Sep at $1.20 for a quick trade. Recognising that price could rebound before weakening again, the long position at $1.13 was more for a trade anyway. I was lucky it turned out nicely. See blog post here.

So, has the dust settled? It doesn't look like it. The MACD has continued its plunge deeper into negative territory as long black candles formed two days in a row on the backs of high volume. However, shares of ARA could be a trading buy. Why?

If we look at the Bollinger Bands and the MA Envelope, we will see that ARA's share price had in the past rebounded if it should break the lower limits. The rebounds tested and broke the 20dMA which acted as a weak resistance. The 50dMA then stopped the share price from moving higher. Could this happen again?

I added to my long position towards the end of the trading session today at $1.04, $1.035 and $1.03. If price should rebound to test resistance, I will offload these shares for a quick trade.  If price should continue to weaken, expect the next supports to be at 98c and 95c.

Looking at the weekly chart, it is clear that stronger support is at 89.5c. This is followed by 61.5c. If these supports should be tested, it will be some way to fall from the current level.

1H 2011 presentation slides here.

LMIR: Will I subscribe to the rights issue?

Sunday, October 2, 2011

It is clear that my complaint about the proposed rights issue is that it is not distribution yield accretive. In fact, it seems to me that the distribution yield could suffer quite significantly, post rights issue.

If I were to subscribe to the rights issue, it would be with the believe that the management will acquire more malls which are NPI yield accretive in the not too distant future using only debt. With its improved debt headroom by then, it should not be a challenge to acquire malls with a total pricetag of around S$450m using only debt.

Assuming that the purchases would have similar or slightly higher NPI yields as the REIT's current portfolio, this could improve distribution yield some 30 to 40% based on current estimates (ok, my estimates). So, subscribing to the rights issue would be akin to a confidence vote for the management.

If we believe that the global economy is going into a recession and that European entities could be recalling funds from Asia to address their financial problems back home, it is reasonable to assume that unit price of LMIR could suffer somewhat.

As there is no compelling reason in the present to subscribe to the rights issue, we could sell the nil-paid rights when they start trading in the hope that we could buy more units in LMIR at a much lower price in the event of a sell down.

Indeed, for some, they could even sell their units in LMIR when the market opens tomorrow if they feel that the proposed rights issue is a bad deal and, hence, will have no part in it.

How will Mr. Market react to the proposed acquisitions and rights issue? It is anyone's guess.

Will I subscribe to the rights issue?

Unlike the earlier rights issues of AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT and First REIT, it is not a screaming buy.

Unlike the rights issues of CitySpring Infrastructure Trust, it is not raising funds to strengthen its balance sheet which means it is not a screaming sell.

Anyway, it is early days yet. I will stay rational and wait for more specifics, if any. I will see if there is more information forthcoming in the promised circular and at the EGM.

For readers who have the inclination, reading my past blog posts (and comments) on other rights issues might provide a window into my thought processes:

1. CitySpring Infrastructure Trust: Rights Issue.
2. First REIT: Rights Issue.
3. AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: Rights Issue.

Related post:
LMIR: Proposed 1 for 1 rights issue.

Office S-REITs VS Industrial S-REITs (2).

I thought I should share some information which I have taken from CBRE's report in Q2 2011 as I have recently received questions from readers on REITs which derive income from office space rentals in Singapore.

For office space, it is expected that "vacancy levels rises (are) inevitable in the next 6 to 12 months. This is the result of increased levels of new supply coming on-stream in addition to second-hand space returning to the market.

"It is apparent the government has been seeking to bolster office supply to facilitate business expansion and to ensure that operating costs remains competitive vis-à-vis other regional cities. Notably, some 1.84 million sf (GFA) of commercial space could materialise from two newly listed parcels – Marina Bay and Paya Lebar. The quality, quantity and competitive cost of Singapore’s office space over other regional cities positions the city state to attract businesses. With global uncertainty lingering, the test is whether this will boost occupier demand and prove to be a winning formula.

"Looking at the office supply pipeline, approximately 8.4 million sf of space is to be completed from H2 2011 to 2015. The GLS sites awarded in Q2 2011 contributed about 10.0% (834,000 sf) of the total. Along with the confirmed conversion of the Market Street Carpark, a Q2 2011 number of landlords/developers are in the midst of repositioning older office buildings through redevelopment. We anticipate that more supply will emerge in due course with the focus on Core CBD."

Therefore, it is understandable why I am not very sanguine about the prospects of REITs such as Suntec REIT and CCT which are heavily exposed to office space rentals. I am instead more sanguine about industrial space rentals.

"Driven by the limited upcoming supply of hi-tech space in the next few years, monthly rent for hi-tech space rose to $2.75 psf in Q2 2011, up from $2.65 psf in the previous quarter.

"Despite the slowing economic growth, demand for factory and warehouse space remains healthy....

"Monthly rental for factories and warehouses rose during the quarter on the back of continued demand. In Q2 2011, the average monthly rents for factory units rose by $0.10 psf q-o-q to $1.85 psf and $1.50 psf for ground and upper floor units respectively. Meanwhile, the average monthly rent for warehouses also rose by $0.05 psf q-o-q to $1.70 psf for ground units and $1.40 psf for upper floor units.

"During the quarter, the capital values for 60-year leasehold strata-titled factory space increased by about 8.0% q-o-q to $312 psf for ground floor units and $230 psf for upper floor units. The capital values for freehold strata-titled warehouse space increased by a smaller 5.0% q-o-q to $471 psf and $412 psf for ground and upper floor units respectively.

"There is still demand for industrial space. Some companies are scouting for a larger space to consolidate their operations and at the same time expand. As such, we can expect some rental upside in the next half of the year."

I shan't say which industrial property S-REITs I like. I think it is easy enough to guess, is it not?

Read complete report here.

Related posts:
1. Industrial rent forecast strongest for Singapore.
2. Office S-REITs VS Industrial S-REITs.

Monthly Popular Posts

Bloggy Award