Smart money exiting US hospitality sector?

This is a blog to share some food for thought regarding the US hospitality sector.

It is going to be partly about what I picked up from someone who seems to be in the know.

It might or might not explain in part why there were two IPOs of US hospitality assets in Singapore earlier this year.

As usual, remember that it is just me talking to myself here in ASSI.

Of course, don't take everything in ASSI as the Gospel truth.

It is just my perspective most of the time.





The US hospitality sector has grown robustly for a decade but incumbents are facing increasing number of challenges and stronger ones too.

So, it is not surprising that some incumbents are letting go of their assets to lock in capital gains.

It could be that rather than deal with the challenges themselves, they are passing the risks to other investors when showing off a past robust growth trajectory is still enough to attract buyers.

It could also be the case that some of the challenges are insurmountable such as the possible ending of the hospitality expansion cycle.






Some pertinent points which I picked up:

1. Very real rising operating costs and, increasingly, operators are under a lot of pressure to keep a lid on expenses.

2. The expansion cycle in the US hospitality sector could very well be coming to an end after 10 years of consecutive growth.

3. Since the Global Financial Crisis, there is a strong sense of financial insecurity and US consumers are given to eliminating vacations altogether in a recession as was seen in the last recession as half of US households spent nothing on vacations then.

Any entity holding US hospitality assets who is thinking of going asset light would be very happy to have a REIT as a captive buyer at this point when discretion could be the better part of valor.







On hindsight, the lukewarm response to Eagle Hospitality Trust's IPO might have been a sign of things to come.

Especially so when the IPO launched with a lowered offer price of 78 cents a unit probably after a less encouraging book building exercise.

A lowered offer price was necessary to give a higher projected distribution yield to make the IPO more attractive to investors.

"In EHT's IPO, no applications were received for about 60 per cent or 26.6 million stapled securities out of the 44.9 million available to the Singapore public for subscription, at the close of the public offer on May 22. 

"The subscription rate for the public offer is therefore 0.4 times."

Source: 
The Straits Times.

An IPO in which the public offer was only 0.4x subscribed?

Eagle Hospitality Trust probably made IPO history in Singapore.

Memorable but not in a good way.






Eagle Hospitality Trust's DPU is partially shielded by Master Leases where fixed rents make up 66% of the Trust's total rent.

Of course, we have to remember that Master Leases are only as strong as the lessee.

Questioning the financial strength of the lessee is probably a prudent thing to do.

Master Leases also have the possible effects of inflating asset valuations and masking the real ability of an asset to generate income.

Without the fixed rents provided by Master Leases, ARA Hospitality Trust's DPU performance could possibly be a clearer indication of what things are probably like on the ground.

ARA Hospitality Trust's DPU missed forecast by a wide margin in the face of challenging conditions in the US hospitality sector and not due to any major internal issues.

"ARA H-Trust On Wednesday separately reported DPS of 1.77 US cents for its third quarter, 11.5 per cent lower than the 2.01 US cents figure forecasted in its IPO (initial public offering) prospectus.

"This comes after overall supply growth outpaced demand growth in the upscale select-service segment for the first three quarters of fiscal 2019, it said."

Source:
The Business Times.





Are these reasons enough to explain the seemingly irrational and repeated insider selling even at a huge discount of more than 40% from the IPO price and in large chunks?

Maybe but probably not.

Of course, we are referring to insiders of Eagle Hospitality Trust, specifically those who sold some hotel assets to be injected into the Trust.

Money should go to where it is treated best and smart money probably know where to go.

Eagle Hospitality Trust could be a good investment for income but just not good enough for the insiders who reduced their stakes aggressively.

Is this an optimistic statement about what has happened at this point in time?

Probably but maybe not.







I am ending the blog with a couple of video clips.

The first one is about hotels in the USA.

Titled "Selling Hotels 2020", the video clip has some interesting insights.

"The buyer pool for value add properties is a lot deeper than the buyers that are looking for stabilized income properties." 






The second video clip is just for fun and laughter.

Ho ho ho!

Alamak, how come like that?

Support SPH a bit lah. ;p








Related post:
His plight and my philosophy.

Recently published:
IREIT Global is going to Spain!