Perennial China Retail Trust: 1H 2013 DPU 1.9c.

Here are some numbers I pulled out:

NAV/unit: 74c
Gearing: 23.74%
Debt Service Ratio: 3.2x

So, what do I think? I did a rather detailed blog post back in February and my view of the Trust has not changed.

Buying into PCRT is really buying into the story that Chinese domestic consumption, at only a third of GDP, will grow and that the Chinese economy will stay strong. We are buying into the Trust's potential to deliver in future.

Right now, I would say that investing in PCRT is still relatively risky although the level of risk is much reduced compared to the time of its IPO.

People who invest for income must realise that much of the distributable income is made up of money from earn-out deeds. It is not cash flow generated from operations of the buildings per se. It is money that is being paid out from guarantees while we wait for the buildings to generate more cash flow.

Based on the earn-out deeds currently available, the Trust is able to continue distributing income to unit holders for another 18 months. Translated, it means that its properties must pick up the slack by end of 2014, everything else remaining equal. Of course, it is unlikely that things will not see any progress and just stand at where they are now.

A more pertinent question is how much improvement can we see? This is really something we cannot say for sure and this comes with the territory when we invest in start ups which is also why I insisted that the distribution yield must be higher for PCRT compared to CRCT for it to be attractive to anyone investing for income. Investing in PCRT arguably is not mainly for income but for growth.

Investors will want see stronger occupancy and evidence of improved cash flow from operations over the next few quarters. The management has to show better results and fast.

See slides presentation: here.

Related post:
Perennial China Retail Trust: DPU 1.96c.

Soilbuild Business Space REIT (Soilbuild REIT).

This REIT's full name is a mouthful. Reminds me of Sabana REIT and AA REITs' full names. Maybe, based on that, I should be interested in it.

Soilbuild gave a range of unit prices from S$0.77 to S$0.80 and had to settle for $0.78. This gives me the impression that Mr. Market might not be too keen on the IPO.

"Soilbuild Business Space REIT (Soilbuild REIT), which owns two business parks and five industrial properties, is offering 586.5 million units. The placement tranche comprises 524 million units and the public offer 62.5 million units.

"At S$0.78, the REIT offers a dividend yield of 7.7 per cent based on projections for fiscal 2014.
Soilbuild and founder Lim Chap Huat will hold an interest of about 27 per cent in the REIT post-IPO, the company said.

"The IPO closes on Aug 14, with listing scheduled for Aug 16." (Source: TODAY online)

At $0.78 a unit, it is at a slight discount to NAV of $0.80 a unit and gearing is approximately 30%. The weighted average lease of its portfolio of properties is 50.5 years.

While seasoned investors in REITs might say that it is possible to get a higher distribution yield from Sabana REIT, with Soilbuild REIT, we wouldn't have to worry about expiring tenancies until much later. Also, Sabana REIT's gearing is closer to 40% than 30%.

Of course, the longer weighted average lease of its properties might make Soilbuild REIT a preferred choice for investors worried about land lease renewals.

Is this a buy? Well, investors for income should be attracted to this IPO. I do not see any red flags in the numbers. However, given the current cautious mood towards REITs, if we are expecting big capital gains, we could be disappointed.

Could it not do a 10% price appreciation on its debut like SPH REIT did? Although that would send its distribution yield for 2014 to under 7%, it could happen. Who knows? Frankly, if that should happen, AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT, with its redevelopment plans and AEIs, would look more attractive then.

So, I do not see how Soilbuild REIT is significantly more attractive than other industrial S-REITs for Mr. Market to pay much more for it. I feel that the IPO is pricing Soilbuild REIT at a fair price.