Tea with Solace: Frasers Centrepoint Limited (FCL)

A Peek into Frasers Centrepoint Limited (FCL)

Frasers Cpt (FCL) has been spun off by F&N, the real estate division carved off from its operation business. It was listed on the SGX Mainboard on 9 Jan 14. The stock opened at $1.61, reaching a high of about $1.70 a couple of days later before retreating to the current price of $1.41 to $1.42.

FCL operates as an international real estate company. It owns many properties that we are very familiar with. It has major stakes in two REITs – FCT and FCOT.

Souce: FCL 1Q14 Results Presentation. Click to enlarge.

Financial Highlights

Revenue increased by about 87% and PBIT increased by about 63% Year on Year. The strong set of 1Q14 results showed year on year gains in all segments. Strong overseas development sales were the key driver.

Development PBIT rose by about 121% year on year. It was led by Australia with the completion of One Central Park (CP) and Park Lane Block 5A in Sydney. As for China, around 750 units were sold in 1Q14, but the overall residential market remains cautious in China. In Singapore, Overall prices declined 0.9% q-o-q in 4Q13. Around 15,000 new homes were sold in 2013, 32% lower compared than 2012

Given the increasingly cautious sentiment in the local property market which has been affected by cooling measures, Frasers Centrepoint’s strategy of venturing overseas can put it in a good position for further growth,

There was also an increase in commercial rents and room rates with higher contribution from One@Changi City . Construction of Waterway Point is progressing well, slated to be completed in 2015.

Currently the Net Asset Value per share is $2.15. At current price of about $1.41, it is about 35% discount to its NAV. I am vested at this price

I resisted entering when it was trading at $1.50 or $1.60. Recently, I make a comparison of similar real estate companies listed in Singapore. On average, they are trading at about 0.75x book value. At current price of $1.41, with about 35% discount to NAV, I feel comfortable vested in FCL properties. Valuation is attractive in my opinion.

FCL has a net debt to equity of about 50%, which I am uncomfortable with. Recent media reports suggest that FCL will launch a hospitality trust, which could raise S$600m. Once they spin out the hospitality REIT, they should be able to move some debt off their books. This asset recycling move is beneficial to FCL similar to what OUE and SPH have done in recent times.

This move can fund new acquisitions and allow them to be asset light. This strategy also allows them to earn more REIT management fees and improve its commercial portfolio.

Potential Risks

FCL has a small free float of only about 12%. This does not sit well with large investors. Hopefully, this will change over time. Increasing FCL free float will improve investor participation and narrow the valuation discount. This remains a uncertainty and likely to depend on market forces.

Another potential risks lies in the majority shareholder. In this case, it is Thai boss, Chaoren, holding a direct stake at 76%. It is of utmost important that the Thai towkay's interests are aligned with minority shareholders.

What are the things the management can do to the detriment of minority shareholders? They can set unreasonably high directors remunerations or, worse still, IPT (Interested Person Transaction) which will solely benefit the majority shareholder instead of all shareholders. I believe IPT risk possibility is low but still it is a risk.

As Warren Buffett said, integrity of management is very important. This is an area which I have to pay attention to.

Conclusion

I believe at current valuation, FCL is attractive, trading at about 35% discount to its book value of $2.15. The portfolio is spread across residential, commercial and hospitality properties in markets such as Singapore, China and Australia which reduces the risk of downturn in any particular country dragging down the whole company. It has a good history of increasing its profits and assets. FCL also has a potential catalyst in the form of REIT listings in the near future,

Key risks like free float and management integrity still remains. The financials of FCL look extremely attractive and there is huge potential upside to go but it also holds hidden risk that goes beyond financial statements.

While many people are proclaiming doom for the real estate, my strategy is to invest at attractive valuation and sit tight to wait for events to unfold. I like to stay invested in good counters for longer period of time. All counters are good investments at the correct valuation.

I came across a recent quote from the papers which best explains my strategy in holding this stock.

"We believe that if you don’t believe in holding a share for 10 years, then don’t even think about holding it for three days… Speculators can still get their thrills through other means. But let’s not make the mistake of confusing investing with gambling"

- Mr David Kuo, Chief executive of Motley Fool Singapore.

Some other guest blogs by Solace in ASSI:
1. King Wan Corp. Ltd.
2. Common Sense Investing.
3. Getting ready for investment.

AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: 7 for 40 rights issue.

Regular readers know that I much prefer rights issues compared to share placements as long as the funds raised go towards increasing income for unit holders. Rights issues allow all unit holders to participate in the enlarged capital base of the entity and to share in the benefits, ideally.

The last time AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT had a rights issue was in 2010. At that time, it was a 7 for 20 rights issue at a price of 15.5c per unit (post consolidation would translate to 77.5c a unit today). It was a pretty straightforward proposal back then because the funds raised was for the purchase of a property.

We could compare the NPI yield of the property to be purchased and the existing NPI yield of the REIT's portfolio and decide if it was a good idea. If the NPI yield of the property to be purchased was higher than the NPI yield of the existing portfolio, which it was back then, quite simply, we have a green light.

However, there is always the question of price. Yes, the price has to be right, as always.

The 7 for 40 rights issue which is now being proposed by AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT is at a price of $1.08 per rights unit. At the closing price of $1.415 per unit today, a theoretical ex-rights price (TERP) of $1.365 has been calculated.

So, buying at $1.08 represents a discount to the TERP. This is more important than the discount to the closing price. Why? We want to be forward looking since we are investing for the future and not in the past.

Imagine that after the rights issue, given the increased number of units in issue, each unit should proportionally be trading at $1.365 if all else remain equal. If we were then offered to buy more units at $1.08 per unit, would we bite? Of course, we would. That represents a discount of about 20% from the future market price, in theory.

Now that we have resolved the issue of price, we come to another important consideration and that is one of value.

Value could be enhanced but value could also be destroyed. I said that the rights issue of 2010 was pretty straightforward. It was to buy a yield accretive property. The rights issue this time is not as straightforward.

80% of the funds raised will go towards:

1. AEIs which include re-developments to possibly max out plot ratios.

2. Development projects (or green field projects, I suppose).

3. Third party acquisitions (i.e. completed properties).

20% of the funds will go towards:

4. Paying down borrowings.

5. Working capital.

6. Payment of fees related to the rights issue.

This is where I see a bit of a problem. I like the fact that 80% of the funds raised will go towards measures which would possibly improve income and, ideally, distributions for unit holders. However, the lack of details make it impossible to calculate the benefits from the proposed rights issue. So, we really must have faith in the managers to do the right things.

In an earlier decision to add to my long position in Croesus Retail Trust, I decided to reduce my investment in Sabana REIT while keeping my investment in AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT intact because I felt that the latter was a better investment with a stronger management who have their interests more aligned with unit holders'. Following that line of reasoning, I will take up my allotment of rights units and also apply for excess rights.

When the nil paid rights start trading, unit holders have the option of selling them away if they do not wish to fork out money. A fair price for the nil-paid rights would be, assuming market price stays at $1.415 a unit, $1.365 - $1.08 = $0.285. This more than compensates for the 15% dilution which a unit holder who does not wish to subscribe to the rights issue would have to suffer.

If you have never encountered a rights issue before, it could be a good idea for you to read some of my older blog posts on past rights issues. See related posts below. Nice little activity for the weekend.

See presentation slides: here.

Related posts:
1. AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: Rights issue.
2. First REIT: Rights issue.
3. LMIR: Proposed 1 for 1 rights issue.