CPF-SA savings 10 years from now.

The biggest downside of not being gainfully employed is the lack of mandatory CPF contributions.

To ensure that my CPF savings will become a more significant bond component of my investment portfolio in my golden years, I have been making voluntary contributions.




Checking on my CPF account last night, I wondered how much would I have in my CPF-SA by the time I am 55? 

55 years old. That is also when money from my CPF-SA will be moved into my newly created CPF-RA to fund the annuity called CPF Life.





My CPF-SA savings in January 2017:

$215,862

Assuming that CPF annual contribution limit (now $37,740) remains unchanged in the next 10 years and applying the following allocation rates:

Click to enlarge. Source: CPF Board.

Doing voluntary contributions to the annual limit each year, for the next 5 years, about $8,159 each year will go to my CPF-SA. 

Ratio of contribution to the SA being 0.2162.

http://www.moneychimp.com/calculator/compound_interest_calculator.htm

At age 50, I would have $308,588 in my CPF-SA.




For the 5 years following that, about $11,699 each year goes to my CPF-SA. 

Ratio of contribution to the SA being 0.3108.

http://www.moneychimp.com/calculator/compound_interest_calculator.htm

At age 55, I would have $441,344 in my CPF-SA.





Of course, all else being equal, the number is likely to be bigger 10 years later as the calculations do not take into consideration the additional 1% interest payable on the first $40,000 in the CPF-SA.

Although it is not $1 million, $441,344 is nothing to scoff at either.





This is why I have told some rather worried readers who are pretty risk averse and who are not investment savvy to seriously consider using the CPF-SA as their primary tool to achieve greater financial security in their old age.

As simple as ABC? 

As simple as CPF.

Related posts:
1. AK showing off his CPF-SA.
2. Average HDB household and $1M.

60% higher interest income from age 55?

Reader:
Would you leave your money in CPF-OA (beyond 55)? 

I can understand CPF-SA @ 4%. 

Wouldnt it be better to move into CPF Life for better returns? 

Noted that leaving it in CPF-OA will provide more flexibility. Thanks.

AK:
We have the option of moving more funds into the CPF-RA up to the prevailing ERS (1.5x the prevailing FRS) at age 55. Is it better? 

If what you want is a higher payout from CPF Life, yes.

However, do note that you will be required to move funds from your CPF-SA first and not from your CPF-OA. 

Only when the CPF-SA has insufficient funds, then, the CPF-OA is tapped.





So, let us say we have quite a bit of money remaining in our CPF-SA after our CPF-RA is created and FRS requirement met at age 55, it is not all that more beneficial for us to move more funds into the CPF-RA because we are not getting a higher interest. 

It is the same 4%, assuming things were to remain unchanged.

However, for someone whose CPF-SA is depleted after the creation of his CPF-RA, if he wants to have the ERS in his RA, he would be moving funds from his CPF-OA and the funds would then be receiving 4% instead of 2.5% interest. 

That is 60% more in interest income!





Like you said, flexibility is sacrificed but, in my opinion, the loss is well compensated.

Sweet but not available for everyone.

I have the happy problem of having much more in my CPF-SA than the prevailing FRS. 




So, will I move more money into my CPF-RA at age 55 to meet ERS? 

I will decide when I turn 55.





To anyone who just dropped in, another blog on the CPF was published earlier today. 

See:
CPF Life Escalating Plan.