The email address in "Contact AK: Ads and more" above will vanish from November 2018.

PRIVACY POLICY

FAKE ASSI AK71 IN HWZ.

Featured blog.

1M50 CPF millionaire in 2021!

Ever since the CPFB introduced a colorful pie chart of our CPF savings a few years ago, I would look forward to mine every year like a teena...

Past blog posts now load week by week. The old style created a problem for some as the system would load 50 blog posts each time. Hope the new style is better. Search archives in box below.

Archives

"E-book" by AK

Second "e-book".

Another free "e-book".

4th free "e-book".

Pageviews since Dec'09

Financially free and Facebook free!

Recent Comments

ASSI's Guest bloggers

Decline in Soilbuild REIT's DPU likely.

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

In its 1H FY2017 report, Soilbuild REIT's management said that the biggest challenge they were facing was to lease the entire space at 72 Loyang Way because of the weak oil and gas sector.







Now, they are going to have to deal with 2 hot potatoes instead of 1.

NK Ingredients, one of the REIT's top 10 tenants by revenue, has defaulted and the fact that they accounted for almost 6% of Soilbuild REIT's revenue is going to hurt.

The loss might not be as traumatizing this round but to be hit by another loss before being able to recover from an earlier one is very unfortunate.

The trauma is cumulative.

The rental guarantee from NK Ingredients' insurance will provide another 4 months of rental income.

So, Soilbuild REIT has 4 months to secure another tenant if it is to reduce the negative impact the default has on its revenue.







NK Ingredients signed a 15 years lease which was supposed to provide some earnings visibility till the year 2028 for Soilbuild REIT. 

Such a long lease agreement is necessary because being in the chemicals industry, I believe that the asset was probably purpose built.

It probably means that it would be rather difficult to find another tenant to move in within a short period of time.

So, we should logically expect another reduction in the REIT's DPU with this development.





We could also see the REIT's NAV come under pressure if the asset remains vacant for a prolonged period.
See related post #1 below.

In the worst case scenario, going by the above statement, if the asset remains vacant, with a hypothetical half year DPU of 2.64c, if we demand at least an 8% distribution yield, we would only be buyers at 66c a unit.

Related posts:
1. An opinion of Soilbuild REIT.
2. 2016 income from S-REITs.
In 2H 2016, I added to my investment in Soilbuild REIT due to a rights issue. This was at 63c per rights unit. I took up my entitlement and also applied for excess rights. From that exercise, I increased my investment in the REIT by more than 10%.
See slides presentation: HERE.

Cromwell European REIT cuts IPO size.

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

UPDATED (15 NOV 17):
After cancelling its IPO after cutting its IPO size, Cromwell European REIT is making another IPO attempt with a much smaller offer of a billion units instead.

"Cromwell European REIT's prospectus Wednesday showed that the company is offering 428.54 million units to institutional and retail investors, and another 581.8 million units to investors who have agreed to take them up ahead of the IPO (at 55 European cents each).

"Cromwell had, in September, offered 1.91 billion units at up to 57 European cents each. The company has also reduced the number of assets that will be in the REIT--down from September's 81 assets."


Source: WSJ





-----------
Earlier this month, when I blogged about Cromwell European REIT, I mentioned that the sponsor, post IPO, would be holding a rather smallish stake in the REIT. 



To me, it seems as if the REIT is a place for the sponsor to dump their rojak portfolio.

"It gives me the feeling that the sponsor wants to dump everything into a pot and be done with it." (See related post at the end of this blog.)






Well, things have changed. 

I don't know why but it seems that they have decided to shrink the size of the IPO and the sponsor will now have a stake of 25.9% to 26.8% in the REIT. 

These are much better numbers.

There will be a better alignment of interests with other investors in the REIT, for sure.


Simply put, if Cromwell European REIT should do badly, the sponsor will hurt much more now compared to when they were going to have just a 12.7% stake. 

So, unless they enjoy pain, with a much larger stake in the REIT, they have a stronger incentive to do better.






Although this is a positive development for retail investors in the REIT, I still cannot help but feel somewhat uneasy with the rojak nature of the portfolio from the get go. 

I understand that they bought these properties from various funds looking for exits but it seems rather hasty to me.

Having said this, all investments are good investments at the right price. 

Trading starts on 28 Sep (Thu).

Related post:
Cromwell European REIT IPO.
Reference:

Cromwell REIT cuts IPO size, ST, 18 Sep 17.




https://www.theedgesingapore.com/negative-view-cromwell-european-reit-down-under


Monthly Popular Blog Posts

All time ASSI most popular!

 
 
Bloggy Award