The email address in "Contact AK: Ads and more" above will vanish from November 2018.

PRIVACY POLICY

FAKE ASSI AK71 IN HWZ.

Featured blog.

1M50 CPF millionaire in 2021!

Ever since the CPFB introduced a colorful pie chart of our CPF savings a few years ago, I would look forward to mine every year like a teena...

Past blog posts now load week by week. The old style created a problem for some as the system would load 50 blog posts each time. Hope the new style is better. Search archives in box below.

Archives

"E-book" by AK

Second "e-book".

Another free "e-book".

4th free "e-book".

Pageviews since Dec'09

Financially free and Facebook free!

Recent Comments

ASSI's Guest bloggers

Buy a car and get an annuity.

Sunday, August 3, 2014

I think we have read enough articles from financial bloggers on why we should not be buying cars in Singapore. 

Although I am generally in agreement, I have also said that, for some people, a car is a need and not a want. 





Generally?

Yes, if having a car would make a person economically more productive, then, the car is actually an investment similar to a capital expenditure in a business. 

Of course, add the fact that a car would probably improve our quality of life, it becomes an even more sensible proposition. (See related post #1.)


So, whether something is a need or a want depends on a person's circumstances. 

Like with many things in life, it isn't as clear cut as some people might make it out to be. 

We must not be too dogmatic about things. There will always be exceptions.





Of course, for many people, I believe, who own cars in Singapore, it is really more a want than a need. All I have is anecdotal evidence, of course. Correct me, if you like.

If we want to have a car simply because it improves our quality of life, because we don't want to squeeze ourselves into crowded trains or buses (if we are lucky enough to actually get into one during rush hours), because we don't want to join long queues for taxis when we go shopping for grocery or bulky items, because we have children and old folks at home, for examples, and if we have the resources, then, go ahead.


What do I mean by having the resources? 

Well, it could be a bit extreme but, to me, it is not just having enough money for 50% of the price tag and taking a loan for the rest. 

To me, it is about having enough money to pay for the car in full without having to take a loan. 





A car loan is actually more expensive than it seems and I have blogged about this before. (See related post #2.)

So, when a friend told me that he is thinking of taking a 60% loan to buy a car because he has enough cash to pay 40% of the asking price, I told him he shouldn't and, of course, went on to explain why. 

Then, he said that his parents are willing to give him $60K to buy the car (the car's price tag being $100K) because it is spare money to them and not making much by way of interest income but he feels bad about taking their money. 

I told him he should consider it and that surprised him.

I told him that if he has set his mind on buying a car, then, nothing anyone says is going to stop him. 




Rather than taking a loan from a bank and paying interest, he should consider taking the money from his parents and paying them interest instead. 

That way, more money stays in the family. 

Yes, take it as a loan and not a gift.



A loan to buy a car now attracts about 2.8% in interest cost per annum. 

A $60,000 loan would attract an interest payment of $1,680 a year. 

Over a 5 year period, this amounts to $8,400.




So, if he were to pay his parents on a monthly basis over a 5 year period, it would mean paying them $1,140 a month. 

In a way, it would be like a short term annuity plan for his parents too.

Mind you, I am not saying that I support my friend's decision to buy a car when he doesn't need one. 

I am just trying to make the best of a bad situation, if you will. 





The way I look at it, my suggestion would help his family save $8,400 in interest payments to an external lender. 

This is enough to pay for 56 months of petrol, assuming an average of $150 a month.

Related post:
1. Money management: Needs and wants.
2. A car loan is different from a home loan.
3. First time car buyer? Get a Mercedes Benz!
4. Tea with AK: A new car for $75,000!
5. Tea with AK: Bought a new car.

How did AK "supercharge" his CPF-SA's returns?

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Some might find this email exchange interesting:

Hi AK,

I chanced upon your blog and started to follow - would like to say thank you for being active and selfless sharing your wealth building story.

I came across one blog entry and you mentioned that in 2008~2009, you took the opportunity and invested in an OCBC SG equity fund and you said that you would invest on it if market crash down again. what is the name of the fund? Lionglobal Singapore Trust Fund?

I am in the midst of looking for a fund to invest and would like to study further on your choice back then.

Warm Regards
I
------------------

Hi I,

Wow! You have done your homework well! Yes, that was the fund I used money in my SA to buy. There were not many mutual funds which were approved for investment with CPF-SA money. :)

This is a unit trust which invests in names I am familiar with and since I am not able to use my SA's money to invest directly in these names, I did it through this unit trust instead. ;)

Best wishes,
AK






Hi AK,
I research further on the return of this fund, amazing 70% in 2009, but -22.76% in 2011, and 19.34% in 2012.
Overall return looks good.
Regards, I
-------------------------------

Hi I,

With our money in the SA, all the more we should buy only when there is blood on the streets. Very few investments can consistently produce results as good as compounding 4 to 5% per annum without fail and with zero risk. :)

Best wishes,
AK


Related posts:
1. SRS, CPF-OA and CPF-SA.
2. Do you want to be richer?
3. A bigger retirement fund with CPF-SA.
4. The CPF-IS and its alternatives.
5. Balancing returns and risks.

How is credit limit for personal credit cards determined?

Friday, August 1, 2014

The purpose of a blog post could be "A" but people could end up seeing "B". It has happened in my blog before and, going by the comments generated on FB, it happened again for my last blog post.

I am not complaining, really. I am just amused by how sometimes we can have unintended consequences which can be good things too, of course.


Some comments:

"I thought the credit limit should be 2x monthly salary only. MAS guideline, I remember. Or no longer in force?"

"std chartered gives a $100000 limit to everyone...the manhattan card i am referring to specifically. anyone else care to share?"

"Strange, ocbc gives my hubby credit limit of only half of his monthly income. We do not have any loan with them. Guess they do not want us to spend more money... We never get 2x or 3x our income. Usually only get 1x of our monthly limit or lesser."

"the banks will do a check with credit bureau. its just like when u open a stock trading acct, there is a financial background check..."

"So, if a person has no debt, pays his bills on time or has more unencumbered assets, he gets a higher credit limit?"

"That's the part I don't understand. We have no car loan, no house loan, we don't have overdue credit cards, no personal loan... How come our limits are so low?"


Including myself, it seems that not many know clearly how credit limits for personal credit cards are determined. So, I did a bit of research and found this:



Interesting, isn't it?

To read more on this topic, visit Moneysense:
http://www.moneysense.gov.sg/understanding-financial-products/credit-and-loans/types-of-loans/credit-cards.aspx

Related post:
An easy way to improve cash flow in life.


Monthly Popular Blog Posts

All time ASSI most popular!

 
 
Bloggy Award