A tale of two blue chips: F&N and Keppel Corp

A late night chat with La Papillion in his cbox led to a comparison between F&N and Keppel Corp.  I decided to do a TA on both counters to see which one has relative strength.

F&N's close at $3.83 is supported by the rising 200dMA and the trendline support which I have drawn in orange color.  Further decline in price would mean that the uptrend is over and it's a double whammy for F&N as the 200dMA which is an indication of long term trend would be violated at the same time. A quick look at the weekly chart indicates the next support to be provided by the 100wMA which is at $3.65.

Using two sets of Fibo lines, we see that the $4.00 mark has two Fibo lines which are very close to each other which indicate that it is an important support.  This is further confirmed when we realise that it is a many times tested candlestick resistance turned support as well.  Breaking this critical support on 2 Feb was a very bearish sign.

The MFI continues to decline and has formed a new low.  It is nearing the oversold region.  That the volume has been diminishing as the price weakened in the last two weeks is a positive for the bulls.  There is a chance we might have a candlestick formation known as the morning star if the price opens higher than $3.89 in the next session and closes higher.  For those who have bought some in the last session or two, good luck.

Keppel Corp's chart, relative to F&N's, shows some strength.  Overall, Keppel Corp's price is being held down by a gently rising 200wMA. Everytime its price approaches the 200wMA, it would pull back. The 200wMA is currently at $8.87.

The buying momentum has not weakened as much as F&N's as could be seen in the MFI.  The index has been forming higher lows and recently formed a lower high.  However, breaking the 100dMA support on high volume to form a doji at $8.18 isn't exactly comforting. 

Of course, it is possible that the price action is setting up for a morning star formation as well.  This will transpire if next session sees the price opening above $8.20 and closing higher.  In the next session, we will also have confirmation if the 100dMA is now a support turned resistance at $8.26 thereabouts. 

I have drawn the trendline support in orange color and just like F&N, Keppel Corp is resting on the trendline and if price weakens further in the next session, the fast rising 200dMA is at $7.75 and should provide support. 

Both blue chips, in my opinion, have a strong thrill factor at the moment. To those who are vested, sit tight for the ride and good luck.

Related post:
Revisiting Keppel Corporation.

A capital question: how much to have or how much to use?

I remember reading a book titled "The Swiss Family Robinson" in my school going days.  It was one of many classics such as "Black Beauty" and "Call of the Wild".  

It is very strange but most people who are younger than me by just, say, 6 or 7 years have never read these books before.  Classics, they are.  Anyway, I digress.

The book in question is about how a family got shipwrecked on an island and had to to use whatever was available there to build a life for themselves and over time, they did quite well.  Very resourceful family.  The father would praise his children if they came up with a good idea by saying: "That's a capital idea!".  

I have yet to come across anyone in real life who would use the word "capital" in the same way.  It might be a very English or a very archaic usage since the book was written in the 19th century.  

Now, that brings me to the topic of this post: capital.  Specifically, capital for investing in the stock market.

Now to do my impression of Forrest Gump: 

"My mama told me that I must pick the right people when I want to talk about stocks which are undervalued as not everyone has the ability to buy."  

Very true but it is hard to identify the "right" people, you might agree.

So, there is an advantage about sharing ideas in a blog.  Visitors who come to my blog are probably interested in investing and making money in the stock market and probably have the means to do so.  

I hope I am right and not being delusional on this point though.

I like the saying that we can bring a horse to water but we cannot make it drink and I've had more than my fair share of horses which do not drink.  Maybe, they were actually camels and my ageing eyes mistook them for horses. 

I digress again.

Back to the topic.  

Now, having some capital is one thing, a question often asked is how much do we need to have exactly before we start investing in the stock market? I have been asked this a few times before.  

A hairstylist asked me if S$10k was enough.  The concept of "enough" is relative like so many things in life.  Very few things in life are absolutes.  However, the question of whether something is "enough" is a very prominent one in life.  

How much to have?

I will use a real life example which happened to someone I know as an illustration.  He had only $5k in savings and went into the market in 2008.  Even with the market running up in the last one year or so, his initial investment is still worth less than $5k today but having used up all of his capital in 2008, he could only watch silently as the market recovered.  Well, he wasn't very silent about it but you get the point.

Then, am I suggesting that if we had only $5k in capital, we should not participate in the market, that we should have more capital before buying shares?  

No. Spare cash that is not needed in the near future or is not part of an emergency fund (e.g. 6 months worth of expenses to be put aside in case of unemployment), should be made to work harder for us.

It is, quite simply, a question of proportion.  Of course, with only $5k, the choices are more limited but the idea is the same as for someone with $50k or $500k.  

Don't plonk all of it down at the same time on one counter or a few for that matter. Always hedge since nothing is ever for sure.  

The question is how much to use for each trade, 10%, 20% or 30%.  

This is up to the individual.  The idea is to reduce risk and taking small steps reduces the probability of a fall.

There is nothing wrong with a $1k value for each transaction and in the process incurring a 3% cost (based on a minimum of $28 brokerage fee per transaction plus other costs) if you were to make more than 10% per annum on that decision.  Nothing wrong at all.  

Rome was not built in a day.  

Wealth building takes time, realistically.  More haste, less speed.

Over time, as our capital grows due to increased savings through employment, capital gains from investments, dividends from investments or some other means, we should not forget this very simple concept.  

"How much to use?" is very often a more pertinent question than "how much to have?".  If you think about it, it applies to other aspects of life as well.

Related post:
Excuse me, are you an investor?