We are not perfect but we can improve our lives.

Hi AK,

I am also pessimistic, actually. The thing I realised these couple of months is in life things can be unfair or by a stroke luck fate deals a bad set of cards or bad things happen because of my incompetence.

However, whatever situation one is in, the cliche of being optimistic that's sold by people may not be too practical. What's practical I find is to be able to do something even a small little thing to be better off. Because I believe little things do add up. Of course, sometimes trying to improve can backfire or backslide but it's just part of life. No one is immune to failure lest they do nothing at all.

When I go out, I do see people working in jobs they cannot extricate themselves from and bosses that exploit people. I mean if they could they would have changed jobs or found a way to have a higher salary. So, not all people are fortunate enough to move into a better situation. I think they call it social mobility.

On the part of feeling very pessimistic, I can understand that. Take, for example, the guy that works at the train station control or the driver or technician or maybe even the engineer. 

Faced with stagnating wages and rising costs and the worst part is the company they work for has long ago categorized them into the lowest ranks in the company. Their advancement may not be existent. So, there is not much hope if u look at it. 

Who is going to help them? 

So, when they start thinking about retirement or old age it can look very bleak for our current generation. The government may look rich but they have other issues to think about as well. The countries around the world may not be as friendly as they seem to be.

But through proper planning and use of excess funds, however little, or to restructure the way their resources are being used or allocated, I believe people can improve their lives. The problem is, I feel, nobody told them how to do it. So, since no ideas were planted, nothing can grow.

So, I think if the SGX changes the board lot size to 1 share come next year, it can really help people who don't have much. Finally, they can own blue chips and, hopefully, reduce their risks. 

People would just have to pay a one time charge with Standard Chartered that's only 0.2% with no minimum fee.  At the very least, they can grow with the economy. 

Even people who don't know anything about stocks, they can just create their own index rather than depend on the ETF which has additional expense or blue chip share building program which I feel is restrictive.

A peeve I have with the STI ETF is that it is hard to sell. I bought the Nikko once and took a long time to get rid of my 100 shares and the pricing wasn't good. So, I gave up on that and just went to buy the blue chip instead. U know in some blogs people sing praises of it but I am not sure if they actually tried to sell it. 

I personally feel there's a bit of untruths to the STI ETF. When they took the 8% y-o-y growth, they were measuring the years where there was a nice increasing slope. However, if one bought at other periods, the return just doesn't look that good.

The flip side of the coin is people, by nature, want quick solutions. 

If I tell people u know u get 1.5% extra or u can save 100 dollars in tax every year, nobody is really going to take notice. But they are very interested in TOTO and 4D and making a quick buck in the financial markets, university graduates included. 

It is only after a long time, through some event happening, that some of the lucky ones will start to work on their lives and the extremely lucky ones meet someone who would hold their hands.

My reply:

....

Till today, I tell people that my ideas are simple but to really see them through might not be easy. I also tell people that I have been lucky and, in life, we always need a bit of luck, investments included. Sometimes, things do go wrong, like you said, and it could well be due to my incompetence too. No one I know has had a life that is smooth sailing always.

I do share your concerns and I do want to help people, especially those of able body and mind who think that it is impossible ever to be financially free. This has been a driving force behind many of my blog posts.

For sure, every little bit adds up. We just need discipline and time for results to show. Problem, like you said, is that people cannot seem to wait.

When I tell people that 4% is a whole lot more than 2.5%, they usually tell me that it is only 1.5% more. I would tell them that they are wrong. It is actually 60% more! It is simple that way but they could not see it. Some saw it and their eyes lit up but some just chose to be fatalistic and ignore the revelation.

I like it when you say how people can improve their lives and I always say that everyone's life could be and should be better.

.....

“No matter how great the talent or efforts, some things just take time. You can’t produce a baby in one month by getting nine women pregnant.”
– Warren Buffett

Read Klein's earlier emails to me:
Tea with Klein: CPF, SRS and HDB housing loan.

Related post:
Take your time to pay down your HDB housing loan.

A blast from the past: Singapore blue chips or S-REITs?

I have been blogging for close to three years and looking back, I was a rather prolific blogger. Over the weekend, I read some of my older blog posts and found one which I have almost totally forgotten about.

Those were the days when S-REITs were largely unloved and shunned. Written in the first year of my blog's creation, to anyone who would listen, it was an effort to show that S-REITs could be great investments too.

Readers from my blog's early days might or might not remember this blog post but, I believe, all readers could benefit from the blog post as a reminder for us not to be bigots. It is a reminder to myself as well as I find that I have an increasing propensity to become mired in mental mud as I grow older. Feel the same way?

Then, you might want to read an ASSI forgotten classic:
Building and preserving our wealth: Singapore blue chips or S-REITs?

Building and preserving our wealth.

When I was a secondary two student, I had to write an essay on whether television had brought more harm than good to our society?  The internet did not exist then. To own a 25 inch CRT TV set was a BIG thing.  I doubt school teachers would set an essay question like that today.

Well, I remember giving it much thought and decided that the television was just a tool and whether it did good or harm depended on how we used the tool.  This is true with any other tool as well.  A tool is just a tool.  How we use the tool is the important thing.  Similarly, in the world of investment, there are many tools at our disposal. All these tools, if used appropriately, could boost our wealth.

Human society has grown more complicated from the days of Socrates and Plato.  In those days, scholars were learned in different aspects of life.  As our knowledge base widened over time, we built colleges and universities. Within these institutions, we find different faculties and within faculties, we find different departments and within departments, we find different subjects.  Scholars have become specialists and not generalists in modern society.

We classify things, putting things in neat boxes with labels, to manage the complexities of modernity. This promotes efficiency as it helps us know exactly where things are and what they do.  However, compartmentalising also masks finer details which could set apart one item from another in the same box.

Two of the boxes in the world of investment are labeled "Blue Chips" and "REITs". 

Some prefer Blue Chips, believing that these are strong companies with stable dividend payouts with a nice possibility of share price appreciation.  I have been a shareholder of SPH and ST Engineering for as long as I can remember.  I was also a shareholder of Chartered Semiconductor and, unfortunately, I remember this too.  Certainly, not all Blue Chips are created equal.

Are REITs then all created equal?  Most certainly not. Some are stronger and better than others. REITs are primarily income instruments but they are not just income instruments.  Like any counter traded in the stock market, REITs have the ability to appreciate in price.  If they have the ability to appreciate in price, are they beginning to sound like certain entities with stable dividend payouts with a nice possibility of share price appreciation?  In fact, many S-REITs are now trading above their NAV.  There are still many S-REITs out there which offer value as they are still trading below NAV, have high yields and relatively low gearing levels.  The attraction of high yields coupled with the possibility of capital appreciation is universal.

Any undervalued counters could appreciate nicely in price once discovered by enough people who believe in them.  It does not matter if they are REITs or companies. The risks and rewards of investing in companies and REITs are similar, if we think of it less dogmatically.  Invest in the right ones and we could be rewarded. Invest in the wrong ones and we're sunk.  There are certain characteristics of a REIT which make it a REIT and not a company, for sure, but I would stop there and not over read.

Some might say that REITs are for the rich or the rich and old because these people don't need to grow their wealth aggressively, that they just need regular passive income since their wealth is sizeable already. I do not think that this is entirely correct as there could be the not so rich or the not so rich and young who just want to make sure that their wealth is not being eroded by inflation.  Choosing the right REITs could do this for these people. So, REITs are not just for the rich or the rich and old.  What we choose to invest in would depend on our motivations for being in the stock market in the first instance.

Finally, most wealthy people are wealthy because they run successful businesses. For most of us, having a well paying job and having good money management habits are the bedrock to building our wealth. Whether we choose to invest in Blue Chips or REITs later on could then build and preserve our wealth at the same time. Indeed, why not invest in both? I am not religious about either one.