The case for crude palm oil.

Some of us might be aware of the criticisms made against oil palm plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia.  The following paragraph from an article in the New Straits Times summed it up nicely:

"Environmental non-governmental organisations and parliamentarians in the EU and US allege that the new demand for palm oil in their newly developed biofuel industry will lead to deforestation in Malaysia and Indonesia to accommodate the expanding cultivation of oil palm. The alleged conversion of forests is then linked to habitat loss, biodiversity and now global warming. " By Yusof Basiron, 24 Feb 2007, New Straits Times.

The Malaysians have launched very convincing counter arguments to the contrary.  Here, I would like to share a short video clip found on YouTube:



There is some truth to the claims that Western developed economies seem to be practising double standards in their criticisms of oil palm plantations.  Some figures shown in this next video clip are quite telling:



The developing world has the right to economic growth, growth which the Western developed economies enjoyed at the expense of the developing world in the past.  If they want the developing world to cut down on what they call environmentally detrimental practices, they should make appropriate contributions.  To me, this seems to be the decent thing to do.