K-REIT: Better buy now?

Unlike the recent rights issue for LMIR, there is little to be gained from selling units in K-REIT and buying the rights. The former so far touched a low of 88c while the latter, a low of 2.4c. 

Buying the rights at 2.4c would mean a total price of 87.4c per unit when they are converted into regular units.

In my blog post of 18 Oct, I said that "given my very small position in K-REIT, I will most probably subscribe to the rights issue. If I were not invested in the first instance, I would not bother buying in now to gain exposure."

By a stroke of luck, any potential investor who took my musings to heart would be happier today.

Why do I say this? Read the relevant blog post here:
K-REIT: 17 for 20 rights issue.

For anyone who wants to invest in K-REIT, buying into K-REIT now at 88c or even 88.5c is a better proposition than buying at 93c, the low of the morning of 18 Oct to be entitled to the rights. That would have worked out to an effective unit price of 93c x 20 + 85c x 17 /37 = 89.32c, post rights.

Of course, buying the rights now at 2.4c or even 2.5c would be an even better proposition as this would mean effective unit prices of 87.4c or 87.5c. However, this option is probably sensible only to people with deeper pockets or people who are with Standard Chartered's brokerage which does not charge a minimum transaction fee.

Not all rights issues are created equal, for sure.

K-REIT: 17 for 20 rights issue.

K-REIT will be seeking approval at an EGM for a rights issue priced at 85c per rights unit. 

This is to partially fund the purchase of Ocean Financial Centre. 

Mr. Market does not like this whole deal and sold down the units to a low of 93c this morning.

What do I think? 

Well, the whole exercise is expected to be DPU accretive which is something investors for income want to see. 

DPU is expected to increase from 6.37c to 6.72c.

Using the low of 93c per unit this morning, the TERP is 93c x 20 + 85c x 17 /37 = 89.32c.  

A pro forma DPU of 6.72c means a distribution yield of 7.52%.




Ocean Financial Centre is currently about 80% occupied. 

If the REIT manager is able to bump up the occupancy rate, we could see DPU and yield increase further. 

However, with the current softening office rentals which is likely to get worse, it could be an uphill battle. 

Commitment by the vendor to provide rental support for a period of five years.

Personally, I have a very small position in K-REIT from a long time ago. 

When I was deciding to invest between K-REIT and Suntec REIT more than two years ago, I chose Suntec REIT for its almost equal exposure to office and retail spaces. 

I have pared down my investment in Suntec REIT some time ago since, expecting its exposure to office space to be a drag on future performance. 

In short, I am not feeling sanguine about office space rentals and have not increased exposure to the corresponding REITs.

Having said this, given my very small position in K-REIT, I will most probably subscribe to the rights issue. 

If I were not invested in the first instance, I would not bother buying in now to gain exposure.




Some important numbers:
Gearing: Increases from 39.8% to 41.6%
All in cost of debt: Decreases from 2.48% to 2.23%
Interest cover ratio: 4.6x to 4.3x

See the slides presentation here.

Related post:
Office S-REITs VS Industrial S-REITs (2).

Tea with AK71: A day at MBLM.

What is MBLM? It stands for Marina Bay Link Mall. This is the underground mall at MBFC, the development which K-REIT and Suntec REIT would co-own with each having a 33% stake.

I was wondering where should I spend my vacation which starts today and I decided to stay in Singapore instead of going overseas. I would spend time going places here and help to stimulate the local economy. Singapore's domestic economy has been said to be tiny. So, I am doing my patriotic duty by spending my vacation money here instead of going away to a foreign land. Ahem.

So? I like the mall. Shops on both sides, it has a wide centre aisle with high ceiling. It is defnitely less claustrophobic compared to the Citylink Mall (which I somewhat dislike). In time, with the completion of the Downtown Line for the MRT, I am sure MBLM would be just as busy as Citylink Mall but the generous space allowance should be enough to cope with increased human traffic. MBLM also serves the residents of The Sail and Marina Bay Residences condominiums. In fact, half the shoppers at MBLM I saw today were foreigners, probably expatriates, with kids.

Go visit MBLM before it becomes crowded. Now till end of the year, spend $80 at MBLM and we will get $15 shopping voucher plus 4 hours of parking for free. There is also an instant lucky dip to win iPads and iPhones but that's for weekends only and I was so hoping to win an iPad. :(

So, I got my $15 voucher, free parking, wrapping paper for Christmas and 2 lucky draw chances. Hope that I would win 1st prize which is for $8,000 worth of shopping vouchers! Then, I would go to the Apple retailer in the mall and get my iPad, Macbook Air etc. Wah.... Day dreaming. Nice!

Anyway, with 4 hours of free parking, I had time to burn as MBLM is smallish with a floor plan shaped like the letter "L" and not many shops were ready for business. I walked to Marina Bay Sands (MBS) to explore the shopping mall.  It was my second time at MBS which has a much bigger shopping mall.  This time round, more shops were open and I didn't have to pay an exorbitant $10 per hour for parking my car! That makes me happy.

Apparently, MBS is now giving free parking for the first 3 hours but one would have to spend $200 at the mall to qualify. I won't qualify. Free parking at MBS costs more than MBLM, if you know what I mean. MBS is for the well heeled, obviously. I like MBLM more which might say something about me. ;)

These are some photos I took with my free Samsung mobile phone which comes with a 5.0 megapixel camera built in. Pretty good shots, aren't they? I still remember when digital cameras were 1.3 megapixel in resolution.

After spending almost 4 hours at Marina Bay, fully utilising my free parking privilege, I went back to Tiong Baru and had a bowl of freshly made bean curd (dou hua) for 60c. Where to find? Tiong Baru Market lor.

Now back in my bedroom, with the air-conditioning set at 25 deg celcius and blogging. Time for a nap! I am a happy man. :)

Suntec REIT: MBFC.

Suntec REIT is purchasing the one-third interest in Marina Bay Financial Centre (MBFC) held by Choicewide Group Limited, Cavell Limited and Hutchison Whampoa Properties Limited for S$1,495.8 million. This is hot on the heels of the announcement by K-REIT that it would purchase Keppel Land's one third interest in the same project. See slides here.

"The Manager is currently reviewing various financing options for the Acquisition to determine an optimal capital structure for the Acquisition. Details for the financing structure will be set out in the circular to be issued to Unitholders in due course, together with a notice of an extraordinary general meeting of Unitholders, for the purpose of seeking the approval of Unitholders for the Acquisition" and "The Acquisition is expected to improve the earnings and distributions for Unitholders". Read press release here

As per Suntec REIT's latest report, its current gearing is at 32.9%.  Total assets at S$5.275 billion.  Debt at S$1.733 billion. The REIT currently has 1,881,862,143 units in issue. See Financial Results for 3Q2010 here.

The net property income (NPI) of Suntec REIT is about S$200 million, annualised. NPI yield is 3.8%.  So, the acquisition at S$1,495.8m should at least have an annualised NPI of about S$60m (for a NPI yield of 4%) to make it NPI yield accretive.

Details as to the NPI of the acquisition has not been made available. However, it was made known that the acquisition will increase Suntec REIT’s office portfolio nett lettable area (NLA) from approximately 1.9 million sq ft to approximately 2.4 million sq ft. Using K-REIT's one third share of the same project as a guide which gives a NPI of S$37.396 million and if we include the income support of S$113.9 million payable over 60 months to be provided by the Vendor, giving us S$ 22.8m per year, we would get S$60.196m per year. So, the purchase looks to be NPI accretive.

It would be interesting to see what kind of financing structure would be decided upon. It is my assumption that Suntec REIT would issue rights to fund the purchase instead of having a share placement exercise if it is sincere about improving the distributions for unitholders. It could also gear up to 45% (on existing properties, excluding the proposed acquisition) and get about $600 million in loans which would reduce the size of any accompanying rights issue. Perhaps, in such an instance, they would have a 1 for 2 rights issue at about $1.00 per rights which would obtain an additional $909 million in funds. It could also gear up on the proposed acquisition (a 40% gearing would secure another $600 million in loans). This would further reduce the size of any accompanying rights issue.

Of course, this is all guesswork on my part. It is very late and I am half asleep. Let's wait for the circular.

K-REIT: 10.2% DPU accretion.

On 11 Oct, I blogged that "the actual DPU forecast following the completion of the transactions will be disclosed in the Unitholder Circular which is not available yet. Will this swap agreement be DPU accretive?  It should be since we are seeing a more than doubling of gearing ratio from 15.2% to 39.1% and a boost to K-REIT’s assets to about $3.4 billion from $2.5 billion."

On 18 Oct, K-REIT's management announced that upon the completion of the transactions, the REIT's DPU would increase from 6.06c to 6.68c which represents a 10.2% DPU accretion for 2011. Although this increase is relatively modest given the fact that the REIT's assets would grow 36% because of the transactions, some other benefits of the said transactions could inject more stability into the REIT. A couple of such benefits are its weighted average debt maturity profile extending to approximately 4 years and its weighted average lease to expiry (WALE) extending from 5.7 years as at 30 June 2010 to 7.8 years.

However, as I try to optimise income from my investments, an annualised DPU of 6.68c or a yield of 5.02% based on the last traded price of S$1.33 per unit is not quite as attractive for me.  I have halved my smallish investment in K-REIT and will redeploy the funds.

Related post:
K-REIT: Swap agreement.

K-REIT: Swap agreement.

"Keppel Land, the Singapore- based developer controlled by Keppel Corp., agreed to sell its stake in the first phase of Marina Bay Financial Center (MBFC) to K- REIT Asia for $1.43 billion, as part of a swap agreement...


"Keppel Land will buy two properties, Keppel Towers and GE Tower (KTGE), from K-REIT for $573 million for redevelopment into about 620 premium residences."

Keppel Land sells Marina Bay property stake to K-REIT: Update
Monday, 11 October 2010

© 2010 - The Edge Singapore

What does this mean for K-REIT?

On 24 Sep, in "FCOT, CCT and K-REIT", I mentioned that "K-REIT closed at $1.31 today. NAV as of Jun 10 at $1.47. K-REIT is trading at an 11% discount to NAV. Gearing ratio is at 15.2%.  This is very attractive to me as it gives the REIT plenty of room to leverage up for potential yield accretive purchases. 1Q 2010 DPU at 1.33c.  Annualised DPU should be 5.32c which means a yield of only 4% based on the current price of $1.31.  K-REIT has, arguably, the strongest balance sheet amongst the three office property REITs discussed here.  The low yield might put off investors but its low gearing paves the way for future acquisitions which could bump up its DPU." Well, it has happened.

Some effects of the swap agreement:

1. The aggregate leverage of K-REIT after completion of the MBFC Acquisition and the KTGE Divestment is approximately 39.1%.

2. K-REIT’s weighted average debt maturity profile will be extended to approximately 4 years. In addition, the portfolio’s average borrowing cost will also be reduced from 3.54% to approximately 3.05%.

3. Weighted Average Lease to Expiry (WALE) from 5.7 years as at 30 June 2010 to 7.8 years.

Read announcement here.

The actual DPU forecast following the completion of the transactions will be disclosed in the Unitholder Circular which is not available yet. Will this swap agreement be DPU accretive?  It should be since we are seeing a more than doubling of gearing ratio from 15.2% to 39.1% and a boost to K-REIT’s assets to about $3.4 billion from $2.5 billion.

K-REIT: Immediate target.

I suggested that K-REIT's price action could be falling into trading bands.  If we look at the chart, it seems quite obvious.  Today, price traded at and above $1.34, the resistance identified on 14 Sep when I said "K-REIT seems to be trading in a 6c trading range recently: $1.16 to $1.22 and $1.22 to $1.28".  I also said "in the event that $1.28 resistance is taken out, one could therefore expect $1.34 to be the next resistance level."

With $1.34 now possibly resistance turned support, the next resistance level should be at $1.40.  This is likely to be a stronger resistance level as it is also a round number.  Fundamentally, at $1.40, K-REIT would be trading at a mere 4.8% discount to NAV and its yield would be pretty low at 3.8%. I would probably do a partial divestment if price does test $1.40.

Related posts:
K-REIT: Moving into the next band?
FCOT, CCT and K-REIT.

K-REIT: In retreat.

The overbought buying momentum in K-REIT was corrected today as the RSI slipped out of overbought territory.  OBV shows that the trend of accumulation is intact and the MFI still shows rather strong demand.  So?  I won't be overly concerned with the selling down.

Immediate support is at $1.26 which is where we find the 20dMA.  Any further selling should find the next support level at $1.22, the top of a consolidation formation and this is also where we find the 50dMA approximating.  If $1.22 should give, which could, of course, happen, the next support is at $1.16.

Related post:
K-REIT: Moving into the next band?

Office S-REITs VS Industrial S-REITs.

An earlier blog post on FCOT, CCT and K-REIT attracted much attention and many comments.  A friend asked me offline if I would invest in any of these REITs.  

Well, I have some pre-historic investments in FCOT and K-REIT while my investment in CCT was divested a few months back.  

Although I am not enthusiastic about office S-REITs, I am aware of what analysts are saying about how office rentals have bottomed in Singapore and that things are looking up.  So, office S-REITs should perform better from now.  The operative word here is "should".

Looking at the numbers, I still very much prefer industrial properties S-REITs and regular readers would know that I favour AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT (AA REIT).  With an XR DPU of 2.08c, its yield is 9.45% at the latest closing price of 22c. XR gearing level is 34.8%.  

With an interest cover ratio of 4.21x (correct as of 22 June 2010), it easily trumps CCT's 3.8x, K-REIT's 3.6x and, of course, FCOT's 2.74x.  

Furthermore, AA REIT's latest acquisition is yield accretive and it has managed to re-finance a S$175m loan due in 2012 at a better interest rate (from 3.5% to 2.16%), reducing interest cost.  So, its interest cover ratio should be higher in the near future.  This is a very promising REIT and I would accumulate on weakness.

A friend asked me about Mapletree Logistics Trust (MLT) recently. I remember that its yield is lower and that it has rather high gearing. Looking at its presentation slides of 25 July 2010, MLT's annualised DPU is 6c which means a yield of 6.82% at the latest unit price of 88c.  Gearing is at 38.8%.  Its interest cover ratio is 5.9x!  This probably explains its popularity.

On 28 July 10, I blogged about MLT's purchase of three distribution centres in Japan for a total of JPY13b or S$200m. At that time, I said "with these latest acquisitions, gearing level would be pushed up to 43.6%.  One wonders if Mapletree Log would go to unitholders with hat in hand in the near future or, perhaps, do a share placement."

As per expectation, recently, MLT launched an equity fund raising to raise approximately S$300 million in capital mostly to fund acquisitions in Singapore, Japan and South Korea.  Without the equity fund raising, MLT's gearing would be at 46% which is uncomfortable.  With this exercise, gearing level would be maintained at 38%.

So, what is my take? Although there is consensus that office S-REITs should do better from now, I would stick to industrial S-REITs as the numbers speak for themselves. 

Don't let my opinion stop you from buying into office S-REITs though.  Value is what we get and price is what we pay.  FA can never do the job of TA.  Good luck.

Related posts:
FCOT, CCT and K-REIT.
AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: Rights issue.
Mapletree Log: Acquires properties in Japan.

FCOT, CCT and K-REIT.

I got a SMS from the blog master of Time to Huat as I was on my way home. FCOT's volume surged as price action formed at nice white candle, closing at 15.5c, overcoming a many times tested resistance at 15c.

Buy signal seen on the MACD histogram, higher low formed on the MFI, OBV spiked and RSI rose into overbought territory. Momentum is positive, demand is strong, accumulation is strong and buying momentum is positive but it could be overdone.

Any reason for the optimism in FCOT? I did not see any announcement by the management which could have resulted in such an upmove in price today. Should we buy some? Could it go higher in price?  From a technical perspective, it does look promising.  Volume is, after all, the fuel that drives rallies and today's volume was impressive.

Let us look at the fundmentals:

FCOT's NAV/unit stands at 26c.  If all the CPPUs were converted, NAV/unit would be 25c. So, at a price of 15.5c, FCOT's units are trading at a 40% discount to NAV.  That's pretty steep.

Gross borrowings as a percentage of total assets (aka the gearing level) is at 40.4%. This is rather high and there is limited room to leverage up for any yield accretive purchases.  However, the 342,500,000 CPPUs have a conversion price of S$0.2369 per unit.  This would bring down its gearing level marginally and give FCOT more capital (S$81.138m) to fund yield accretive purchases in future in case all CPPUs were converted. 

The 3Q DPU was 0.25c. So, the annualised DPU should be about 1c. Based on today's closing price of 15.5c, the yield is 6.45%.  This is not very attractive if we were to compare to what we could get from AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT, for example.  Of course, these two REITs are in different real estate sectors.  Let us compare FCOT with CCT and K-REIT instead. 

CCT closed at $1.47 today. NAV as of 30 Jun 10 at $1.36. CCT is trading at a 8% premium to NAV. Gearing ratio is at 32.8%.  Plenty of room to leverage up for further yield accretive purchases. 1H DPU was 3.9c.  So, the annualised DPU should be about 7.8c.  This means a yield of 5.3% based on today's closing price. The yield might be lower than FCOT's but CCT has a much stronger balance sheet.

K-REIT closed at $1.31 today. NAV as of Jun 10 at $1.47. K-REIT is trading at an 11% discount to NAV. Gearing ratio is at 15.2%.  This is very attractive to me as it gives the REIT plenty of room to leverage up for potential yield accretive purchases. 1Q 2010 DPU at 1.33c.  Annualised DPU should be 5.32c which means a yield of only 4% based on the current price of $1.31.  K-REIT has, arguably, the strongest balance sheet amongst the three office property REITs discussed here.  The low yield might put off investors but its low gearing paves the way for future acquisitions which could bump up its DPU.

I have told my friends before that for me to buy more units in FCOT, it has to offer me a much higher yield. The much higher gearing and lower quality assets compared to CCT and K-REIT are justifications. There is also greater safety in CCT and K-REIT as their interest coverage ratio (ratio of year‐to‐date earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation to interest expense) are at 3.8x and 3.6x respectively while FCOT's ratio is at 2.74x.  There is little doubt that FCOT's fundamentals are the weakest of the three. So, naturally, a higher yield is necessary to compensate for higher risk.

See FCOT's presentation slides here.
See CCT's presentation slides here.
See K-REIT's presentation slides here.

K-REIT: Volume expansion.

Just yesterday, I mentioned that "the attempt to move higher in price was on the back of relatively low volume.  In fact, we could see a negative divergence between price and volume clearly.  Price is rising on lowering volume.  Not too promising." and "Of course, things could look much rosier if we have an expansion of volume the next day while price moves higher. TA is only about probability after all."  Well, today, volume expanded significantly.  In fact, it expanded so much that it negated the negative divergence observed yesterday.  The buy signal on the MACD histogram delivered the goods and proved the skeptic in me wrong.

OBV has climbed sharply indicating strong accumulation activities while the MFI rose towards overbought territory.  Demand is strong but the fact that there is a long upper wick in today's white candle suggests the presence of some selling pressure beyond $1.30.  Looking at today's trade summary, however, we find that of 4,334 lots traded, almost half of these (2,164 lots) were buy ups at $1.32.  If this buying momentum continues, we could see price moving higher.  Expect $1.33 to be the immediate resistance although it could be a weak one if the buying momentum continues. Immediate support at $1.28.

Related post:
K-REIT: Moving into the next band?

K-REIT: Moving into the next band?

On 14 Sep, I suggested that "K-REIT seems to be trading in a 6c trading range recently: $1.16 to $1.22 and $1.22 to $1.28".  I also said "in the event that $1.28 resistance is taken out, one could therefore expect $1.34 to be the next resistance level."

Today, K-REIT traded at and above $1.28 the whole session.  It touched a high of $1.30 before closing where it started the session at $1.28, forming a gravestone doji.  The sell queue at $1.30 is formidable. Could $1.28 be the new support?  Frankly, a gravestone doji does not inspire much confidence.  Furthermore, the attempt to move higher in price was on the back of relatively low volume.  In fact, we could see a negative divergence between price and volume clearly.  Price is rising on lowering volume.  Not too promising.

However, OBV shows accumulation mode in full swing.  MFI is rising gently and not overbought.  RSI is however in overbought territory and suggests that buying could be overdone. Very interestingly, the MACD histogram has turned green, a buy signal but notice that the distance between the MACD and the signal line has been narrowing.  So? Caution.  It would not be a good idea to buy into K-REIT now.

Of course, things could look much rosier if we have an expansion of volume the next day while price moves higher. TA is only about probability after all.  Whether $1.28 is now support needs confirmation.  That there is a strong support at $1.22 has been established earlier.

Related post:
K-REIT: Trading bands.

K-REIT: Trading bands.

It seems that the worst is over for office rentals in Singapore. There is a general expectation that things have stabilised and we could even see some upside next year.  I have a small position in K-REIT in my frozen portfolio and this small investment is actually enjoying a paper gain now.  So, when would I sell my stake?

We could do a very simple TA for K-REIT even if I do not have access to today's data on ChartNexus. Price touched a high of $1.28 before closing at $1.26. It opened at $1.27 and touched a low of $1.25. So, picturing it mentally, it formed a black spinning top today. That it touched a high of $1.28 is significant as it confirms $1.28 as an important resistance level. Volume was only half of yesterday's which suggests a lack of conviction by sellers today even as price action formed a black candle.  So, the indecision suggested by the black spinning top does not have strong downside pressure, I feel.  In case of continuing downside, where do I see support?

Looking at the chart, it is quite obvious that $1.22 was a major resistance level and I expect this to provide immediate support in case of a move downwards. If this breaks, the next support is at $1.16.  Having said this, you could have noticed an interesting phenomenon. K-REIT seems to be trading in a 6c trading range recently: $1.16 to $1.22 and $1.22 to $1.28.  This is useful information for anyone who is interested in profiting from some range-bound trading.

In the event that $1.28 resistance is taken out, one could therefore expect $1.34 to be the next resistance level if this phenomenon continues to play out.

Singapore office plays better bet vs developers: Morgan Stanley
Tuesday, 14 September 2010

© 2010 - The Edge Singapore

K-REIT: Uptrend intact.

K-REIT's uptrend is intact with a 1c fall in price from the previous session to $1.21. That price closed at the high of the day is encouraging. MFI continues to trend up which suggests sustained demand.  However, it is nearing overbought and we might see the rise in price slowing or, perhaps, we might see a slight pullback to the 20dMA which approximates the uptrend support. In case of a pullback, support is at $1.15.

What makes $1.22 different from $1.22 in January?  When $1.22 was hit in January, the MAs were farther apart from each other compared to what is observed now. Now, the MAs are closer to each other, more tightly knit, if you like. Such an arrangement is likely to limit volatility and provides a firmer platform for any further upmove in price.  All the MAs are rising and the 50dMA seems poised for a golden cross with the 100dMA.

Volume has been stronger on up days compared to down days and if this persists, price could break $1.22 sooner than later.

K‐REIT Asia will distribute to Unitholders 2.97 cents per unit on Aug 26.

K‐REIT Asia achieves $22m in distributable income for 2Q
Monday, 19 July 2010

© 2010 - The Edge Singapore

Charts in brief: 16 Jul 10 (Part 2).

FSL Trust: 42c seems like a difficult resistance to overcome at this point in time. This is gap resistance and resistance provided by the declining 50dMA at the same time. RSI has also moved higher up into the overbought region while we see a sell signal on the MACD histogram.  Volume has been reducing as price moved higher. Without an expansion in volume as price moves higher, it is unlikely that 42c could be taken out in the next session. Unless there is some positive newsflow soon, chances of a pullback in price are higher. With all the higher lows formed in the MFI and RSI, the momentum oscillators are clearly uptrending and I expect any pullback to find initial support at 40c.

Genting SP: First touched on 29 Jun, $1.20 has proven to be a tough nut to crack. Volume has been reducing since that day as price stayed above the 20dMA. If we look purely at the 20dMA, the short term uptrend seems to be intact. However, if we look at the MACD, we see a bearish crossover with the signal line on 2 Jul and since then the MACD has been declining beneath the signal line. MFI, RSI and OBV have all flatlined.  There is clearly no trend where these indicators are concerned.  Pay attention to the 20dMA which should be at $1.17 in the next session or so.  If this is breached, price could move lower rapidly.

Healthway Medical: Since price touched a high of 21c on 16 Jun, the MFI has been in decline.  This suggests a weakening demand. However, we do not see a similar decline in the OBV.  In fact, the OBV has gone up which suggests that there is more accumulation than distribution. There is some underlying support and even though demand has weakened, there is little selling pressure.  Immediate support is at 18.5c.

K-REIT: A very nice up day with a very nice white candle as volume more than doubled from the previous session.  Price closed at $1.22, the high of 11 and 12 Jan.  if momentum keeps up and price action goes parabolic, I won't be surprised if we see $1.34 (161.8% Fibo line). At this point in time, it is still a fantasy.

Related posts:
FSL Trust: The skies are clearing up.