Olam: Renounceable Underwritten Bond-Cum-Warrant Rights Issue.

Olam, in response to Muddy Water's claims, said that they "have more than enough capacity to meet ... repayment obligations of S$1.5 billion in the next 12 months, as well as ... likely capex of S$1-1.25 billion in the same period" and that "without raising any further debt (they) can easily meet ... debt repayment obligations and pursue ... planned Capex, in addition to meeting the on-going working capital needs." Then, why are they issung bonds-cum-rights now?

This reminds me of CitySpring Infrastructure Trust's claim a few years ago that they did not have to issue rights and that people who said they had to didn't understand their business. It could also be a coincidence that Sunny Verghese was also the chairman of CitySpring Infrastructure Trust then.

Each 1,000 shares owned will get to subscribe for 313 bonds with a face value of US$1.00 each. The bonds have a 5 year tenor and a coupon rate of 6.75%. This unsecured bond will raise some US$750m for Olam.

Each 1,000 shares owned will also be given 162 free warrants. Strike price of warrants is US$1.291. The warrants expire in 5 years and cannot be exercised in the first 3 years. This will raise US$500m for Olam if all the warrants are eventually exercised.

Full details here:
Olam International announces proposed US$750 M Renounceable Underwritten Bond-Cum-Warrant Rights Issue

Rights issues to strengthen the balance sheet is bad news for shareholders as it dilutes EPS (eventually, in this case). It also admits that the balance sheet was weak in the first instance. What are shareholders to do? It is Hobson's choice.

"Temasek is committed to take 100% of rights not subscribed by existing shareholders." Just like the case with CitySpring Infrastructure Trust, Temasek Holdings could end up enlarging its share of Olam.

　
"The Transaction is available to all its equity shareholders and provides a unique and rewarding opportunity to participate in the long term growth of the Company." This requires a leap of faith and I certainly hope for all shareholders that things improve from here.

Share price could take a hit tomorrow. $1.35 perhaps?

Related post:
Olam: A time bomb?

Olam: A time bomb?

The high profile standoff between Muddy Waters and Olam is not about something new. Earlier this year in June, I wondered at Olam's share buy backs as well. I blogged about it and attached a section of research done by Kim Eng on the company then.

What Muddy Waters has said does make sense and Olam has to focus on its business rather than its share price.

Should Olam come to collapse (as we believe it will), its use of much-needed cash to buy back shares at this time should give rise to questions about whether fiduciary responsibilities have been breached – particularly given the possible existence of individual motivations that are not necessarily aligned with those of Olam’s lenders.  - Taken from Muddy Waters' open letter to Olam.

To read the letter in full, go to Muddy Water's website: here.

So, is Olam going kaput in time? I know that Sunny Varghese was at the helm of Cityspring Infrastructure Trust. I was not impressed with that entity and was lucky enough to exit with a small gain. Is he able to do much better with Olam?

Short sellers could home in on Olam in time and it would be interesting to see how things turn out.

Related posts:
1. Olam: Share price up on buy backs.
2. Cityspring Infrastructure Trust: Rights issue.

Olam: Accumulate now?

A few days ago, I blogged about Olam and how Kim Eng has a SELL recommendation. That got a reader who is invested in Olam sufficiently flustered to send me an email. Hey, I was just sharing an analysis which I thought made sense. Don't shoot the messenger and if it is any consolation, my badly timed initial investment in Wilmar fared worse.

"Olam has been the second worst performing member of the STI this year, with only Wilmar having done worse." (The EDGE, 18 June)

Anyhow, the article by Joan Ng in the same publication went on to report that CIMB Research thinks that present cheap valuations could be a buying opportunity for long term investors.

"The correct investment stratey to follow since 2009 has been to raise market exposure and beta when sentiment enters the panic zone, like now," Ajay Kapur, Deutsche Bank. He notes that there have been three major reflation exercises over the past three years.

"At the start of each of these episodes, investors were incorrectly cynical, consumed by the panic of the moment. We think we are on the verge of another policy reflation in the coming weeks or months. Start buying during this bottoming process rather than over-analysing." (The EDGE, 18 June)

For the numerically inclined, Olam is said to be trading at a price to book value of only 1.2x now compared to its trough of 1.5x during the global financial crisis.

Accumulate? Olam's management seems to think their stock presents great value too.

Related post:
Olam: Share price up on buy backs.

Olam: Share price up on buy backs.

I have always thought Olam's gearing level quite scary. Then again, it is the same with Noble and Wilmar although not as highly geared as Olam. I was told that their business models are such that high gearing level is nothing to worry about. Indeed, Mr. Market seemed to think so as their share prices were sky high once upon a time.

Gearing is a double edged sword and if a business is able to magnify its returns through gearing, then, higher gearing would intensify the returns many times over. However, in down times, things could turn really ugly. Then again, in the current environment of very low interest rates, borrowers are shouldering much lighter burdens.

When Olam announced that they are buying back shares from the market, my immediate reaction was a positive one. Hey, the management are confident in their own business and are walking the talk. However, when we remember that it still has plenty of debt in its books, it doesn't seem to make much sense anymore.

Kim Eng has this to say:
Share price jumps on buyback mandate. Olam’s share price has jumped 11% since the company announced last Friday that it has commenced a share buyback programme. While such a move is usually a positive sign, the circumstances for Olam seem rather unusual. Fundamentals-wise, other than to deter the short sellers, we do not think it is necessarily an enhancive step for shareholders. Borrowing money to purchase shares. The case for a share buyback is stronger for companies with piles of idle cash coupled with strong operating cash flows. Olam, however, is considered highly leveraged with net gearing of 189% and adjusted net gearing of 42% as at FY6/12. Since listing in 2004, its operating cash flow has been positive only in 2006 and 2009 as funds were needed for expansionary working capital.

Kim Eng has a SELL recommendation on Olam with a TP of $1.43.

Investing in REITs: A flawed strategy?

I have been told by some that my strategy of investing in REITs is a flawed one. I am also sure that there is no paucity of investment blogs out there saying that one should avoid REITs as they are always hungry for funds and are likely to go hat in hand to unitholders regularly or indulge in private placements.

If I were to be in the mood, I would pen short comments to correct what I feel are bias thoughts. Of course, if the writer should be downright rude, I would return measure for measure. There is always room for discussion and even room to disagree. However, I take a very dim view of bigotry and bad behaviour.

One of the catalysts for the above paragraphs is an article I read in The EDGE regarding Olam's raising US$600 million through selling of more shares. This, I have no doubt, would dilute the interests of minority shareholders.

To the people who would avoid REITs but would invest in companies like Olam instead, I wonder how is Olam different in such an instance? Raising funds to buy more income generating assets sounds like a strategy for growth which any REIT might pursue.

Personally, my investments in REITs have done very well in the last two years with the exception of Saizen REIT but we know why that was so. If we are making money in our investments, we must be doing something right. However, we have to remain vigilant to ensure that our investments remain in good health. This is true whether we are invested in REITs or companies.

Olam International said to raise US$600m in share offer: Update
Monday, 06 June 2011

© 2011 - The Edge Singapore

Olam: Channel trading?

Olam could be seeing the early days of trading within a channel. Continuing weakness in price could see support at $2.68 tested.

ADX has been declining and the downtrend has weakened. The MFI and RSI could both test 50% for support soon. The MACD continues to rise, although in negative territory. Underlying momentum is strong and there is demand. To verify this, today's black candle day was on the back of relatively low volume.

See if a picture of low volume pullback should continue. Buying at supports could be very rewarding if this were the case.