Tea with Mike: Analysis of Yangzijiang, an S-chip (Part 2).

Now, let’s address the various concerns I have with regards to investing in YZJ:

1) Falling margins for shipbuilding

Most of the fat contracts secured during the boom years in 2007-2008 are over. One should not expect margins to be fat today but I doubt we will see a free-fall in margins. YZJ's latest quarter's margin is about 20% for its core shipbuilding segment which is low by historical standards but if we compare it with Chinese peers, it’s not bad at all. Management has mentioned they will not drastically lower prices to secure deals. Although I take their word with a pinch of salt, the numbers seem to bear this out too.

2) Operation and execution risk

One of the bigger deals undertaken by YZJ that is due for delivery is the 10,000 TEU container ship. One should closely monitor the delivery as any prolong delay or problems after delivery will be serious, and I would run with my money at double quick time

 

3) Another fraud in the making?

Yangzijiang, being another S-chip, does need close scrutiny. I cannot ascertain their numbers, but there are a few things I take comfort in. They have FCF in all but 2011, and this translate to dividends, so it’s not a complete paper exercise. Due to the fact that they are dealing with ships, it is extremely difficult to fake a deal, you can check if there is indeed a deal from the customer side (Yangzijiang’s customers are renowned, big companies with ready information on their website) There is also third party website that track shipbuilding orders and the sale of 2^nd hand vessels, so chances of a fabricated deal is very low, but there is no way to track margin. E.g. they can be making a loss from building a ship due to cost overrun, but under-report the COGS in the quarterly reports, and there is no way can be sure when it comes to such nitty gritty.

4) HTM investments

This is my biggest concern. Yangzijiang has 12 billion in HTM (held to maturity) investments.  Such investment has provided them with a steady stream of supplementary income, and ensures their financial strength, which is critical in the ship building industry. The HTM investment is literally loans to companies who otherwise are unable to get loans at better rates. So, if you like, Yangzijiang has a banking arm.

More than half of its HTM is charging interest rate of more than 12%, and about 1/6 of it HTM is above 18% when the PBoC benchmark rate is about 6% and effective interest rate of YZJ loans is only 4%. (From 2012 AR)

I am concerned about the strength of the companies that need to loan from YZJ at above 12%  which is also known as the shadow banking rate. However, impairment level till 2012 is less than 5%, and from their latest quarterly report, there is zero bad loans, loans are covered by collateral pledged by borrowers.

Another reason why I find the HTM risk easier to bear is fact that about 55% of the collaterals are properties or land, and YZJ has set up a property development arm to develop land at the old shipyard when they were asked to vacant the land for other development purposes, so it seems that the management does have a contingency plan. From the interview with NextInsight, most of these land and properties are in Jiangsu where it operates. Hence, they do not have any problem that comes from a lack of local knowledge.

Ship building and its related activities still contribute up to 90% of its revenue. So, even if there should be some inflated issues with HTM, which are assets and not liabilities, YZJ should still survive.

In conclusion, if you cannot trust the numbers of YZJ, you should not invest in it. If you trust the numbers, there are several good things going for it. Hope my analysis make sense.

.................................................

Read Part 1: here.

Tea with Mike: Analysis of Yangzijiang, an S-chip (Part 1).

The recent episode with China Minzhong was viewed by many, including professional analysts, as the proverbial last straw that broke the camel's back. S-chips have been declared by them as untouchable and even toxic.

Surely, S-chips have reached a low point and are mostly unloved. In such a situation, are we brave enough to venture forth to sort through the debris to find hidden gems? See what Mike has to say about Yangzijiang (YZJ) which he is vested in.

.................................................

Before I start, to avoid losing sleep over this blog, I must say that  all information I am sharing here is to my best knowledge accurate but I cannot be held liable for any errors. Of course, please point them out if you should spot any.

I invested in YZJ because it fits my approach to investing which is to buy into an alpha company in a cyclical industry during a down cycle. In my opinion, the low valuation of this company is unjustified.

 

1. YZJ pays decent dividends, consistently paying out about 30% of their earnings, yielding about 5% based on recent share price. I like companies that compensate me while I wait for the upturn.

2. I like the management's foresight. In a time when China is competing head on with South Korea for a share of the global shipbuilding pie, many shipyards competed on costs, and offered great terms to build smaller bulk carriers and container ships. YZJ moved into “green” technology that saves on fuel costs and built large container ships. They are the first in China to build 10,000 TEU container ships for Seaspan, but lost the crown to Jiangnan Changxing, which has signed deals to build 16,000 TEU boxships.

If we followed the recent developments in the shipping sector, many are talking about LPG carriers, YZJ through an interview with The EDGE Singapore, mentioned they are in talks with companies for building such. While it is akin to counting eggs before they are hatched, it does show that the management is on top of things where industry trend is concerned.

3. I also like the management's prudence. They did not venture aggressively into the O&G sector which proved costly for COSCO, instead they developed a financing arm (Mirco-financing and HTM investment) which works well for them so far. Of course this is not without controversy and risks. I will talk about this later.

4. Although their order book has shrunk considerable from the boom years, it is beginning to grow again. Order book shows about USD3.24b with 47 outstanding options worth about USD2.54b that are not yet exercised by its customers. Their customers base has also grown since their IPO.  

5. Ratios and financial numbers? I have mentioned about low gearing, reasonable P/B of 1.1 and PE ratio of 5.4. Valuation has not taken future recovery into account. This is unlike many hot stocks which have valuations that have already accounted for expected strong growth for years to come.

6. There is favourable sector development. The PRC government is trying to reform the shipping industry. They want the top 10 shipping companies to account for 70% of the ship building contracts. YZJ is in the top 5.  Although no one will want to start a shipyard in China now, as demand recovers, domestic competition might increase and disrupt the consolidation of the industry. So, the PRC government has effectively closed off such competition by not issuing anymore license to potential new players. In addition, they also do not allow any expansion of capacity of existing builders'.

..........................................

In Part 2, we will see what Mike thinks are the possible risks of investing in YZJ.

Continue reading: Part 2.

Related post:
Tea with Mike: Approach to stock selection.

Tea with Mike: Approach to stock selection

There are many ways of selecting stocks. Some people use ratios such as PER and P/B. Some people look at charts, spotting 52 weeks highs and lows. Some look for the highest yields. The list goes on. When I first started, I felt overwhelmed and didn’t really know what to look for.

Over the years, I adopted an approach that is similar to Graham's “large companies that are out-of favour” tactic. I look at alpha cyclical companies during their down cycles and I believed that will offer some margin of safety.

I bought into 2 counters, Golden Agri and YZJ, using this approach. For shipping industry, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) hit record bottom at 661 last year. The peak was 11,000. Even if one were to take the average, we can quite safely say the BDI was nowhere near where it would be mid-cycle. Shipping down cycle is characterized by a dearth of new shipbuilding orders, collapse of freight rates, and the bankruptcies of weaker players, and all these have happened in the past 1 year. So, I can safely conclude that we are near the trough of a down cycle. Near? Yes, because there is no way to ascertain if we have reached the bottom yet.

Then, we search for alpha companies. These are companies in the sector that have the strongest financial strength and operating efficiency. This is so that our investment does not go to the dogs and get consumed by the down cycle. I shall not go into detail about YZJ, as that itself would be a long blog but, particularly, I looked out for a low gearing level.

Both Golden Agri and YZJ have low gearing levels. More important is the amount of short term loans to be repaid. Down cycles combined with the maturity of large loans is what killed many companies. Even the biggest private shipyard in China, Rongsheng, is facing severe difficulties because of this.

Next, while profits would be affected negatively, there should not be losses, and the companies should be big enough to show resilience in earnings through previous crises. There should be Free Cash Flow (FCF) in most of the operating years too

Golden Agri’s earnings are levered heavily on Crude Palm Oil's (CPO) price, and its production levels. If we look at the last 30 years, 2013 has seen CPO price falling more than 40% from its last peak. Although inventory has been piling up, Golden Agri will not be able to increase its production at the same rate it has been able to in the past. I bought it for its vertically integrated businesses and its economies of scale. For higher production growth, one should, perhaps, look at First Resources.

This approach requires a lot of patience as the sectors are out of favour and there is very little chance that the share prices would shoot up suddenly. Also, as AK always says, cheap could get cheaper and this is especially true in such out of favor stocks. Say ship building and most people would frown. So, there might be selling pressure from time to time but if the companies are fundamentally strong, such selling pressure provides opportunities for accumulation.

I would like to acknowledge that I first got some ideas and information from Calvin Yeo of "Invest In Passive Income". A link to his blog can be found in the left side bar of AK's blog.

-------------------

AK's comment:

I was heavily invested in Golden Agriculture at one time, recognising that it was heavily levered to the price of CPO. When CPO price was rising relentlessly, Golden Agriculture was a good investment. I made a tidy sum from it. Mike's approach is valid, I am sure, but one has to be patient.

We could consider investing in Wilmar International which also has an exposure to CPO but it is less levered to CPO production which forms less than a fifth of its earnings. Wilmar has a pretty diversified earnings base. However, if we are looking for positive Free Cash Flow, then, Wilmar would fail our selection process.

As for ship builders, I would also frown when I hear the phrase. However, we can find nuggets in the sector and when we look at what Cosco and YZJ are doing, we know where to look because these yards are venturing into building for the O&G industry. This is what KepCorp and SembCorp have been doing for years. With more rigs delivered, there is a higher need for OSVs and, yes, I am invested in Marco Polo Marine which has the added advantage of a strong moat. However, if we are looking for positive Free Cash Flow, then, Marco Polo Marine would fail the selection process too.

I believe that Mike's approach is probably suitable for anyone who is more conservative since stronger companies in cyclical industries are unlikely to go bust in a down cycle. When the up cycle returns, these companies should lead the recovery.

Thanks, Mike, for offering us your perspective on stock selection. It has provided me with food for thought.