The US consumers are back!

There is a saying: "old habits die hard". This is why I always say what we see happening in the global economy is not just a function of economics and politics, it is also a function of culture. For any culture to change their practices, it would usually take an entire generation and the will to change has to be forceful.  Usually, this means that reality must have shifted so much as to burn an indelible mark in the psyche of its people.

Thus, we saw the Americans saving more when it looked as if their country was plunging into a bottomless pit in the midst of the global financial crisis (which, by the way, originated in the USA).  A worsening of the crisis was averted by the decisive actions of the US government.  With the spectre of prolonged hardship receding, it seems that the American consumers are back at what they do best.  This is a double edged sword, I do not doubt.  However, it is good news for the economy while it lasts.

Visa 2Q profit jumps as consumer spending rebounds

Visa posts 33 percent jump in 2nd-quarter profit as consumer spending gains strength
Eileen Aj Connelly, AP Business Writer, On Wednesday April 28, 2010, 6:49 pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Revived consumer spending drove Visa Inc.'s fiscal second-quarter profit up 33 percent and the credit and debit card processor forecast strong revenue growth for the full year.

Visa's growth continued to lean heavily on surging debit card usage as customers still prefer paying with checking account funds rather than with credit cards. The increased fees that Visa is collecting from merchants for processing customers' payments echoes the improved sales results many companies have reported in recent weeks as consumers appear to be more confident about spending.

In the U.S., Visa said 19 percent more transactions were made with debit cards and the size of those purchases in dollars rose 18 percent. In foreign markets, 20 percent more transactions were made with debit cards and the value of those transactions in dollars surged 33 percent.

Chairman and CEO Joseph Saunders noted that volume growth fueled the earnings gains, but said the company is "increasingly optimistic that economic growth will gradually improve."

Read full article here.
 
The Bears are Wrong: "The Consumer Is RE-leveraging," Jon Markman Says
Posted Apr 26, 2010 09:34am EDT by Peter Gorenstein
 
The recent data is convincing; The U.S. consumer is making a comeback. New home sales jumped 27% percent in March, rising to a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 411,000, the Commerce Department said Friday. Meanwhile, durable goods orders (large manufactured products) rose the most since the 'great recession' began.

As sure as buying low and selling high is a winning formula, an American with money will purchase goods, says Marketwatch columnist and author Jon Markman. "Anybody who's bet against the American consumer over the long term has gone broke," he tells Aaron in this clip.



Related posts:
New global economic leadership.
Real estate as a hedge against inflation.

Real estate as a hedge against inflation

For the last year or more, I kept hearing and reading the word "deleveraging". Companies and individuals are all busy deleveraging. So, basically, people are saving more money, paying off their debts and spending less. Overall, it gives an impression that leveraging is undesirable and should be done away with.

Marc Faber famously said that, in Asia, the family run businesses in Hong Kong and Singapore have very little debt. Many rich families in Singapore don't have any mortgages. He thinks that Asian real estate will continue to do well. This gels with what Jim Rogers thinks about how we should own some real estate and he, in a recent interview in New York, actually said that he would buy some US real estate now if he were staying there.

In my posts on the subject of gold, I mentioned that I buy gold as a hedge against inflation and that I do not trade gold. We could also buy other tangible assets which would keep pace with or grow faster than inflation and protect or grow our wealth in the process. However, most of us are not in the same league as Marc Faber or the rich families he mentioned.

So, what are we to do if we want a piece of the action and own some Asian real estate? Do we work very hard to save money before we buy that piece of real estate? 100% cash upfront and without a housing loan? Or do we put down 20% and borrow 80%?

Quite simply, like any other investment, the answer lies in timing. Buy when the market is depressed or just turning up and hold for the long term. If you believe that the world is going to see extraordinary inflation in future, this is one thing we should do if we have the means. If we have the money, pay 100% cash upfront. If we only have 20% to <100% of the value, take a housing loan for the balance. As an example, I bought private real estate 6 years ago and took a loan for 80% of the price. The valuation is now 80% higher. If I were to rent it out, I would realise a yield of 7% p.a. This is much higher than the interest rate on the bank loan I'm servicing. Capital appreciation plus steady passive income. Sounds like a high yield stock? Sure does. Having said this, we have to keep an eye on the interest rates. If that goes up significantly and we do not have the means to pare down the outstanding loan amount drastically, it might be time to let go. If I had told myself 6 years ago that I should work harder and save more money before taking the plunge, I would have worked harder, saved more money but ended up poorer. The next time the property market has a correction in price, bear this in mind and take the plunge, if you have not done so already. Inflation is a powerful force. If we have the means, we must do all we can to protect ourselves against it. Buy Japanese real estate