Buy 99 years leasehold or freehold property in Singapore?

For home buyers in Singapore, most would qualify for a BTO HDB flat. It gives the best value for money. 

Even a resale HDB flat is a good deal compared to the sky high asking prices of private condominiums. 

However, regular readers know that I would caution against buying very old HDB flats.






"It's OK lah. I like the location and there are 60 years left to the lease."

And how long are you going to be staying there for? Is there a possibility that you might want or have to sell it sometime in the future? 

To be prudent, we might want to think a bit further along those lines.







For whatever reason, many people aspire to stay in a private property here even though it would cost at least 3 times more compared to a BTO HDB flat, location for location, size for size. 

And it is not $50,000 for a HDB flat versus $150,000 for a condo hor. 

It is more like $350,000 for a HDB flat versus $1 million for a condo kind of proportion!

Hello! This is Singapore!





Some people pay so much just to stay in private properties that they become slaves to their mortgages. They become house poor. 

House poor is definitely not fun. Why? 

No money left to have fun lor.

Even if people can comfortably afford to stay in private properties, to me, one compelling reason to go private in Singapore is because we want to get a property sitting on freehold land or with a land lease that is significantly longer than 99 years. 







Otherwise, buying a private condo (with a 99 years land lease) here is like paying at least 3 times more for a home just because it comes with some (usually inadequate) facilities which have to be shared with tens or hundreds of other households in the estate. 

(In the case of buying a landed property with a 99 years land lease, don't even have facilities lor. Alamak. Does that sound similar to a HDB flat?)

Oh, did I also mention that the monthly building maintenance fee which condo dwellers have to pay could be 5 times more than what a HDB flat of comparable size would attract?

Silly, isn't it?





So, if you are buying a private property in Singapore, with very few exceptions, it is my opinion that unless the price is truly attractive (think Rule of 15 and value for money), it should be on freehold land or 999 years leasehold land.





-----------------------------------------------------------
For those who do not follow me on Facebook, this was a conversation I had with a few readers on the issue of lease decay:

Jack James:
Does it matter ? Hahahha .

Ooooii ... our Sarawak landed houses are all on 60 years lease la !!

Assi AK:
I not staying in Sarawak wor.

Jack James:
Just to tell you such lease/leasehold/999years/ freehold are really not a big deal .

Assi AK:
If I don't have a choice, then, nothing to say. If I have a choice, I rather have a longer land lease.

Lease decay does not change whether it is landed or not.

It matters if you care about leaving your home as a legacy for future generations.

Jack James:
Trust me , 99years is already a big deal . 

My colleague parents bought 3 rooms flat at Little India area for S$6,500 and now it worths close to S$400,000 .
So long , you have something on hands , it appreciates .
Well , even if you have freehold property , don't dream the next generation would love to stay at the old hundred years old house , they probably cash out and buy new houses . In view of that , buying lease or freehold for next generation ? I am sure they will cash out too . No problem one la lease units.

Assi AK:
What future generations do is up to them.

I am inspired by how my friend's family stay in a FH walk up apartment which their grandfather left behind. He bought a few units in the estate back then. They can collect rent in perpetuity. No issue with lease decay. We have to do what matches our motivation.

Jack James:
Wait until it is 100 years and see who will rent a 100 years old freehold condo .

Assi AK:

Haha... Singapore is not that old yet but going by what I see in the USA, homes which are more than 100 years old find ready tenants too... Just need renovation from time to time but there is no problem with lease decay.

It costs money to renovate an old property but it beats returning the asset to SLA upon expiry of the land lease.

Jack James:
I can see you inject a big fears on lease decay . In any circumstances , you will still reap a big profits in leasehold . Not an issue . Just be SMART to cash out before it is too late .

Seah Chen Yang:
by the time it reach 100 years, you are already long dead to know about it and can do nothing to change it either way. lol. so that is why AK say freehold or not depends on whether you wanna leave it for your next generation and we have no control on what they want to do after we pass even if we say we want to leave it for them to earn rental income for life but they choose to sell for capital gain after we pass.

Assi AK: 

Yup, owners of 99/60 years leasehold properties must bear that in mind. Lease decay is a real issue which many property agents play down because it suits their purpose. Having said that, all investments are good at the right price.

We can only hope that our future generations will be financially prudent and savvy. We can only make what we feel are the best decisions for them when we are still around. Right?

Raymond Chiam:
U.s houses may be old but they are not 10 over storeys like our FH condo. Such tall buildings may become structurely unsound after 40, 50 years. Let alone 100! Definitely need to tear down n rebuild n that's provided neighbours don't all opt for en bloc. So FH unlikely to last more than 2 generations in my opinion

Assi AK "... built to ensure safety in the event that they are overloaded beyond the calculated "design event" and/or to account for mistakes in the building's design or construction... The combination of using a 50-year recurrence for design loading events and safety factors in construction typically results in a design exceedance interval of about 500 years, with special buildings (as mentioned above) having intervals of 1,000 years or more. This means we would expect a typical structure to fail once in every 500 to 1,000 years."
Source:
http://www.independent.co.uk/.../how-long-are-skyscrapers...

How long are skyscrapers built to last?

INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Assi AK I did a search because I remember a friend telling me that unless it was built in the 70s or early 80s, newer skyscrapers are able to last a long time.

Assi AK It might also be interesting to note that compared to buying land in Singapore, construction cost is relatively inexpensive. Having land or a share of the land in perpetuity (even for redevelopment) is better than returning the land to SLA when the lease expires.

Assi AK If we are worried, we can always stick to buying FH condos in Geylang. They are typically a maximum of 8 storeys high. ;p

Assi AK Anyway, if it comes to a need for redevelopment, it is going to be generations away. All I can do is leave my future generations assets which I hope they will cherish. What happens in the future will be their responsibility. 

A decision to buy FH, 999 years (as good as FH) or 99 years (these days even 60 years or 30 years) leasehold properties is only probably right or wrong in relation to our motivations. 

What we choose to buy should very much depend on what we plan on achieving.

As usual, if you have money oozing out from your nose and ears, you can pretty much buy whatever you want. Don't mind me.

AK is just a frog croaking in a well.







Read:
Buying freehold.
Related post:
60 years leasehold condo in Singapore.

Mentally and financially prepared for retrenchment.

This is part of an email a reader wrote to me after reading an updated blog post. (They invested in multiple properties and are now retrenched.)



Reader:
"Their experience is getting more common. I am in my late 50s and I see many friends and relatives in my age group being asked to go. I am sure it will be my turn soon as the company has not been doing well. 

"I have been reading your blog since 2010. I have invested in the REITs you suggested, including Saizen. I am not rich like you but I think I can cope if I lose my job today. I found out that many won't be able to cope. CPF and some savings cannot be enough.

"In a way, your blog saved me and I told my sons that they should learn from you too. Their future can be so much brighter than mine because they can start early."





Sometimes, when readers in their 50s or 60s ask me what should they do to be like me, I find it hard to give them an encouraging answer. This is because what I have achieved today took me almost 20 years. So, you can imagine how happy I felt reading the above email.

As long as we still enjoy a meaningful and regular earned income, we probably could and should make an effort to invest to have another stream of income, passive income. Age shouldn't matter.

When we are in our 50s and 60s, if still employed, we are in our final years of employment. If we want to have a chance at getting rich quick, put aside, maybe, $50 each month and buy BIG SWEEP or TOTO. 

Think again before signing up for some courses or schemes with get rich quick promises. If it sounds too good to be true, it might just be.

Also,

Think again before buying some life insurance or complicated financial product. Don't buy just because they are giving you some freebies.




What should we be doing?

Click on the suggestions below for some ideas:

1. Make good use of our CPF account.

2. Take part in CPF Life for lifelong income.

3. Invest in bona fide income producing assets and think of monetising our home.

Notice I put investment last in the list. This is because the CPF is a risk free and volatility free option.

Investments are rarely risk free and definitely not volatility free.

If you are in your 50s or 60s and if this is the first time you are reading my blog, remember, no one cares more about your money than you do. 




In your golden years, you should enjoy life a bit more if you can afford it but don't do anything stupid with money.

At your age, you cannot afford to make big mistakes with money.

What would be considered stupid and big mistakes?

Anything that might force you back into the workforce if it should go wrong even if you must become a cleaner making $1,300 a month.







Always ask yourself what is, realistically, the worst case scenario and if it should manifest itself, would you be able carry on with your life as usual.

Then, you would know what to do.

There are many examples of seniors who are foolish although they say wisdom should come with age.

Our golden years should be financially secure. Don't be foolish and you can make it so even in the face of retrenchment.





Related posts:
1. How many 20 years and $29K do we have?
2. Withdrawn CPF money in excess of MS.
3. Financial strategy for the elderly with spare $.