The email address in "Contact AK: Ads and more" above will vanish from November 2018.

PRIVACY POLICY

FAKE ASSI AK71 IN HWZ.

Featured blog.

1M50 CPF millionaire in 2021!

Ever since the CPFB introduced a colorful pie chart of our CPF savings a few years ago, I would look forward to mine every year like a teena...

Past blog posts now load week by week. The old style created a problem for some as the system would load 50 blog posts each time. Hope the new style is better. Search archives in box below.

Archives

"E-book" by AK

Second "e-book".

Another free "e-book".

4th free "e-book".

Pageviews since Dec'09

Financially free and Facebook free!

Recent Comments

ASSI's Guest bloggers

Business Cycles, Fiscal Policies and Monetary Policies.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

I have always maintained that having some knowledge of Economics is useful in the modern world.  A reader, Paul, happens to be a student of the subject at a higher level.  He has kindly emailed me some essays which he has given me permission to publish.  I hope you find them as interesting as I have.

Business Cycles, Fiscal Policies and Monetary Policies

Business cycle refers to economic expansions and recessions. Developed economies normally have a 3-5% GDP growth annually. USA's potential GDP growth is about 2.5%. A recession happens when an economy has 2 consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. Depression is a recession on a larger scale. It refers to a period when the GDP output falls by more than 25% and when there is high unemployment rate of about 20%. Depressions are longer in duration, often lasting more than 4 quarters.

Economic recessions could be the result of internal shocks and external shocks. In a recession, there is a lack of effective demand for goods and services. Some economists view recession as a natural occurrence as the economy goes through structural changes, as moving from sun-set industries to sun-rise industries. A recession could also be caused by structural failures such as the banking system. In short, the economy has to shed its excesses to be healthy again.

In the years prior to the recent financial crisis, Robert Lucas and Ben Bernanke declared that the central economic problem had been solved, business cycles were tamed and severe recessions were things of the past. We all know what happened in 2008.

After the Great Depression in 1930s, governments worldwide actively tried to tame the business cycles. USA went through a strong period of recovery powered by the industrial sector. The recessions were short and mild, while the recoveries were strong and sustained. This led to questions if the business cycle was obsolete? The next depression in the US was in 1970s, caused by external shocks such as the high oil prices. In the 1990s, the world again went through another period of small recessions and strong economic growth, which led to the comments made by Robert Lucas and Ben Bernanke. Is complacency one of the causes of the recent financial crisis?

Fiscal and monetary policies are employed by governments trying to tame the business cycle. Fiscal policies refer to the G component, which is the government. In times of economic expansion, governments would raise taxes, and cut their spending to prevent overheating of the economy. These are called contractionary fiscal policies which could lead to a budget surplus. In recessions, governments have to lower taxes and increase spending to stimulate demand in the economy. These are called expansionary fiscal policies which could lead to a budget deficit. For example, lowering taxes for both consumers and producers would increase their real income, and increase their spending respectively, all else being equal. This would result in a higher C and I component which increase the national income.

Monetary policies involved using the money supply to influence the interest rates. When money supply increases, interest rates will fall. When interest rates fall, cost of borrowing for both consumers and producers will fall. For example, this could lower mortgage interest payment for consumers and make it cheaper for producers to borrow money from the banks. This would again boost demand through C and I. Lower interest rates would also weaken the currency of the country, which would be positive for the country's trade balance, all else being equal.

Central Banks would normally be responsible for monetary policies in a country and they are supposed to be independent from the government with the main objective of achieving price stability, with an inflation target of 1-3%. In the recent crisis, Central Banks around the work also resorted to different methods to increase the money supply, such as quantitative easing and the use of reserve ratios for commercial banks.

As mentioned earlier, adopting expansionary fiscal policies could lead to deficits. Budget deficits could be funded by surpluses from previous budgets or the issuance of bonds to borrow from the market. As mentioned in earlier blog posts, most governments resorted to the issuance of bonds to finance budget deficits in the recent crisis. These bonds can be bought by domestic or foreign investors. Hence, we have the figures of debt to GDP ratio. When foreign investors are involved, it would cause movements in the exchange rates, due to changes in demand and supply of the home currency. This is one of the reason why Japan is upset when the Chinese government bought much more Japanese government bonds( JGBs) recently.

These policies are called demand side management policies, as they are used to stimulate demand in the economy. If fiscal spending is carried out to improve supply in the economy, for examples, through education and infrastructure spending, which would increase the future productivity of the country, then, these would be called supply side policies. The Singapore government has been constantly engaging in supply side policies through retraining programs for workers, investments in the education system, construction of new infrastructure such as metro rails, implementation of tax incentives for engaging in R&D activities etc. This would boost the country's productivity and competitiveness in the future.

The readings below focus on debt issues, and fiscal, monetary policies.

Sovereign Debt
http://www.economist.com/node/16397110?story_id=16397110
http://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2010/06/indebtedness_after_financial_crisis
http://www.economist.com/node/16397098?story_id=16397098
http://www.economist.com/node/16397086?story_id=16397086

Corporate Debt
http://www.economist.com/node/16397174?story_id=16397174

Consumer Debt
http://www.economist.com/node/16397124?story_id=16397124

Fiscal and Monetary Policies
http://www.economist.com/node/16943569?story_id=16943569

Related posts:
Hope this helps to refresh your "A" Level Economics!
USA, a rock and a hard place: Paul opines.

MIIF: Springboarding or diving?

Saturday, September 25, 2010

The question I have now is whether MIIF is going through a correction using time, waiting for the 20dMA to catch up before moving higher in price. The 20dMA is fast approaching 54.5c and to any chart watchers, it is quite obvious that this price is the immediate support.


The Bollinger Bands look like they are in the early stages of squeezing, signalling the onset of lower volatility and a possible springboarding (or diving) of MIIF's unit price to come. The OBV has been continually moving higher while the MFI is approaching 50% which could serve as support.  RSI suggests that the buying momentum has weakened but the MFI which takes into account volume as well shows that demand has been rising.

If the immediate support at 54.5c should give way, the next support is at 53c, a many times tested resistance level.  This is where the 50dMA is approximating as well.  Strong support is at 51c which is also where the rising 100d and 200d MAs would be in time.

Golden Agriculture: Stay cautious.

Golden Agriculture's share price made a successful attempt in recovering lost grounds as price opened at 57c and closed at 58c, forming a white candle on rather low volume in the last session.  Given the lack of enthusiasm in the upmove, one wonders if there would be a follow through which would see the 20dMA at 58c taken out as the immediate resistance.


The MACD continues to move lower after completing a bearish crossover with the signal line. MFI and RSI have both formed higher lows which is encouraging.  OBV is flat.  Technically, there isn't any clear direction.

Fundamentally, CPO price has stayed above RM2,700 and Golden Agriculture should be a strong beneficiary of this.  However, with the recent bad press and uncertainty as to whether things would worsen, it might be better to err on the side of caution and to stay sidelined. Support provided by the 100d and 200d MAs could be a better entry point and that is currently at 55c.

Related post:
Golden Agriculture: Unable to break out.

Buy more silver on weakness.

On 7 February 10, I mentioned that "Silver is a real asset, with real value, just like gold, as its supply is finite.  Fiat currencies, on the other hand, do not have any intrinsic value and more could be produced at will.  So, we expect silver to at least keep pace with inflation and in an inflationary environment, an investment in silver should protect our wealth from being eroded."


In that blog post, I mentioned that my research showed that silver was very undervalued and was trading at the higher end of the Gold:Silver ratio since 1980.

At that time, silver was US$15.15/oz while gold was US$ 1,052.20/oz.  It was just reported by Bloomberg today that "Gold for December delivery was 0.2 percent higher after reaching US$1,299.70 an ounce on the Comex in New York. Silver for immediate delivery in London climbed as much as 1.2 percent to US$21.3875 an ounce, the highest price since October 1980." Read article here.

Silver has gone from US$15.15 to US$21.38 an oz.  This is a gain of 41% in slightly more than 7 months.  Gold has gone from US$1,052.20 to US$1,299.70 an ounce.  This is a gain of 23.5% in the same period.  An investment in either one of these precious metals would have been very rewarding but silver has obviously outperformed gold by a large margin.

I am glad I bought some silver and I would like to buy more silver on weakness when the opportunity presents itself as I continue to believe that having some investment in precious metals is an essential part of anyone's portfolio. Silver is a laggard in the realm of precious metals and it is just catching up.

Do I have a target price for silver? Silver reached its peak in value on 15 January 1980 when 1 oz of gold could purchase only 14.9 oz of silver.  Based on today's price of gold at US$1,299.70 an ounce, it would mean US$87.22 an ounce for silver!  Mind boggling, isn't it? That would be 4 times higher than the current price!  Of course, I am not suggesting that silver would hit that price anytime soon, if it does go that high at all. I am merely putting things in perspective. Remember where the price was in February? Good luck.

A new record! Gold prices struck a record $1,300.07 an ounce in afternoon trade on the London Bullion Market as investors sought a safe haven for their money amid increased uncertainty over the global economic outlook. Silver, meanwhile, jumped to $21.44 an ounce . Published: 5:44PM BST 24 Sep 2010 - Read article here.

Related posts:
Gold or silver?
Gold nearing US$1,300 an ounce.


Monthly Popular Blog Posts

All time ASSI most popular!

 
 
Bloggy Award