Investing for income: An important element (UPDATED: BUFFETT ON BUYING HIS FIRST STOCK.)

Wah! So much mail from the broker! 

AK must be trading a lot!


I receive quite a few emails from readers. 

Among them, some are encouraging and some are depressing. 

I usually share the more encouraging ones here in my blog but not the depressing ones. 

No point, right?





Well, in case you are wondering, the depressing ones are usually along the line of how they make so little money in their day jobs and how they cannot save enough. 

So, they can't put much money into investments and for those who did, they get so little dividends that it seems meaningless.

What do I have to say in reply?





It takes time to build a strong income producing portfolio. 

It is not going to happen overnight. 

It is usually not glamorous. 

It is definitely not exciting like promises of fast money.






So, what is needed? 

Time.

Now, you have an idea what those envelopes contained.

Readers who have followed me for a while and who have put some of my strategies into action would be able to attest to how their financial health has improved if they have been disciplined.

With extra money coming in regularly, how could it not be a good thing?





A reader told me how his passive income has improved from just a two figure sum so many years ago to the five figure sum it is today. 

Impressed? 

I know I am.

So, for those who are already on the path to financial freedom, stay the course. 

For those who are just starting, remember that it is always toughest at the start.





Related posts:
1. If we are not rich, don't act rich.
2. Do the right things and we could transform our lives.
3. Seven steps to creating passive income from stocks.
4. The best insurance to have in life.
5. First REIT: AK reveals size of investment.

How to size our more speculative positions?

I have shared before that it is OK to gamble a bit once in a while. 

I am Chinese and gambling is in my blood. 

It's not my fault that I am born Chinese.





So, I have nothing against speculation per se. 

1. As long as speculators know that what they are doing is speculation, 

2. As long as they are mindful of the possible consequences 

and 

3. As long as they are able to take the losses comfortably if things go wrong, there is nothing really wrong with speculation, is there?

http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2014/08/accordia-golf-trust-hole-in-one.html

Well, I would say please keep speculative positions small. 

Of course, how small it is would depend on

1. our risk appetite 

and 

2. our ability absorb losses. 

2 to 3% of our portfolio size for some and 10% for others? 

Sounds rather arbitrary, doesn't it?





When a reader asked me for a "formula" to help quantify "small", what did I say?

I told him it would have to be an amount I can recover quickly within a year or less in case of a total loss. 

This measure has always given me peace of mind and he said it is helpful to him. 

So, I thought I should share this.





Of course, if I should have more than one speculative position, the total exposure should not exceed the amount I think I could recover within a year. 

It is a bit like having one or five credit cards from the same bank. 

The credit limit doesn't increase with each additional card issued.





Like with so many things in my life now, it is about avoiding stressful situations where possible and not losing more money than I can recoup in a relatively short time works for me.

Always ask "to what extent can I afford to be completely wrong?"

Once we have the answer to this question, we will know how to size our more speculative positions.



Related posts:
1. Motivations and methods in investing.
2. How to make recovery from losses easier?
3. To be richer, be comfortable with being invested.

Croesus Retail Trust: Acquisition of ONE'S MALL.

I had expected some form of equity fund raising and although I was hoping that it would be a rights issue, I was not surprised that a private placement has been chosen instead. It is more expeditious, after all.

However, it does not mean that I am happy about it since, in all likelihood, I won't be one of those "other investors" who would be offered new units in the Trust to be priced between 89c and 92c per unit. What? Unit price was about $1.00 when you last looked? Wow! 89c would be a steal, wouldn't it? Bummer.

Anyway, the acquisition of the new (freehold) mall, ONE'S MALL, in Greater Tokyo will cost about S$132.5 million.

The private placement is expected to raise S$70.2 million to S$72.6 million. The Trust will also be drawing upon a Japanese local bank loan for most of the shortfall (equivalent to S$74.1 million) at an interest rate of 1.29% per annum. I like the natural hedge that comes with this and also the very low interest rate.

A much smaller amount of S$6 million will be drawn from the Fixed Rate Notes issued in January this year. To utilise funds from the Fixed Rate Notes minimally is a good move as it attracts a higher interest rate of 4.6% and it is also denominated in S$. So, there will be some FOREX risk but it will be miniscule here with only S$6 million drawn.

Overall, income distribution per unit (DPU) is not expected to receive much of a boost with this acquisition because it is half funded by the private placement. Expect an increase of only 0.2% in DPU. Expect NAV/unit to increase by only 0.1%.

What about gearing level? As the purchase is about half funded by the private placement, gearing level stays more or less unchanged, reducing from 51.7% to 50.5%.

Nothing to be too excited about.

See announcement: here and here.

Related post:
Croesus Retail Trust: 4Q FY2014 DPU improved.

If our income is $3K a month, we could get a 6.6% raise!

People sometimes wonder if it takes a lot of time to prepare food to bring to work. It surprises people to find out that actually it could take very little time. It is very easy to cook oatmeal and to make sandwiches, for examples.

It could take 15 or 20 minutes to make some sandwiches to last us for a few days each time we do it. Therefore, the time taken to prepare meals on a per meal basis is actually very little. (See related post #2.)

Oatmeal takes very little time to prepare too. (See related post #1.)

So, join me for some home made lunch?

What's this?

Bread, cheese, lettuce and ham. Yummy!

Evidence of me chomping away.

Cost? Probably $1.00 or a bit more.

Whenever I ask people to try making their own lunch to bring to work, a common reason for not even trying is that they don't have the time or energy to do it.

Well, I understand that it is more convenient to simply buy cooked food outside but there is always a price to pay for convenience. We might want to ask if the price we pay for convenience is too high.

High, higher, highest. It is all relative, isn't it? So, if our gross salary is $3,000 a month and we spend $450 a month eating out at work (15% of our gross income), is that too high? I don't know about you but it seems like a lot to me.

Of course, for someone who makes $10,000 a month, that same $450 monthly spending on food at work is more manageable, everything else remaining equal.

All our circumstances are probably different and saving a couple of hundred dollars a month might not look like much to some people but to the vast majority of working Singaporeans, I believe that it does make a difference.

A dollar saved is a dollar earned and, for someone who makes $3,000 a month, if he could save an extra $200 each month, it is like getting a 6.6% salary increment each month. Is that not good to have?

Related posts:
1. It takes only a few minutes to cook oatmeal.
2. Prepare 6 gourmet sandwiches at one go.