The email address in "Contact AK: Ads and more" above will vanish from November 2018.

PRIVACY POLICY

FAKE ASSI AK71 IN HWZ.

Featured blog.

1M50 CPF millionaire in 2021!

Ever since the CPFB introduced a colorful pie chart of our CPF savings a few years ago, I would look forward to mine every year like a teena...

Past blog posts now load week by week. The old style created a problem for some as the system would load 50 blog posts each time. Hope the new style is better. Search archives in box below.

Archives

"E-book" by AK

Second "e-book".

Another free "e-book".

4th free "e-book".

Pageviews since Dec'09

Financially free and Facebook free!

Recent Comments

ASSI's Guest bloggers

CPF OA to SA transfer or MS Top Up to SA?

Monday, August 8, 2016

Reader:
"I would like to make transfer from OA to SA so I did a check with CPF. Assuming that I reach the full retirement sum at age 55, they mentioned that I cannot withdraw cash top up to SA and its accrued interest but I am allowed to withdraw the OA to SA funds transfer and its accrued interest. I am confused however. My initial understanding is if my combined sum in OA and SA exceeds the full retirement sum, I am allowed to withdraw the access funds. If that is the case, whether it is cash top to SA or OA transfer to SA, should not make any difference. If you could clarify on this issue, I will be greatly grateful. Thank you."




AK:
"MS Top Up is a cash top up meant to help us with funding our retirement. It is an additional input and not part of the of the annual contribution limit (mandatory + volutary).The OA to SA transfer is money that is already in your CPF account.


"The OA money is from mandatory contributions and voluntary contributions (if any). These are made within the annual contribution limit and not in addition to the limit.The CPF is meant to help every member with retirement adequacy.

"Whether we choose to do OA to SA transfer or MS Top Up will depend on our circumstances. Whatever those circumstances might be, the MS (or the FRS) will go to our CPF-RA at age 55 and cannot be withdrawn (unless we choose the BRS by pledging a property) until age 65 at the earliest in the form of an annuity (i.e. CPF Life).

"Unless our CPF savings are made up entirely of cash through MS Top Ups to the SA, it is unlikely that we won't have a more meaningful lump sum withdrawal at age 55 if we should exceed the prevailing MS (FRS) significantly by then."

Related post:
1. Almost 55 and worried about CPF.
2. Did CPF Top Ups but denied lump sum payment.

Investing for income to help support a small family.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

Hi AK,

I'm a 34 years old on a stable job earning enough to support a small family. I have a sum of around 50k to 70k set aside purely for investment for passive income.

Although the sum is not a lot but I'm looking at buying blue chips (im looking at singpost and starhub) and REIT (I'm looking at Aims and Cambridge industrial trust).

Its my 1st time investing and im a very lazy person and I don't want to be bothered about or worry about whether the stock will crash or not with minimal montoring.

May I have your opinion on whether the 4 stocks mentioned above serve my purpose of minimal monitoring?

Regards,
D




Hi D,

They are all good investments for income. Well, they have been so for me (except for Singpost which I do not have) ;)


Minimal monitoring but still must monitor. ;p


I am ready to buy more in the event of a stock market crash, all else being equal. :)


Best wishes,

AK



Passive income will be useful in helping D pay some bills regularly at home.

"That is what passive income is for at the most basic level, to help pay some of our bills." 
Source:   http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2015/06/thank-you-for-investing-in-income-for.html

Related post:
AK anyhow picks 5 stocks for income investors.

What BREXIT means for my money?

Many are worried about BREXIT and what it could do to an already anemic global economy. Many are also worried about the high level of liquidity in the system becoming more elevated and how ineffective it is in addressing the global economic malaise.



  • Reader:


    Notice that you have been accumulating stocks. Do you think that in the current climate the prices are distorted? The sentiment and the stock price seem to diverge. Also there is no optimism and extreme pessimism. But there are some heighten risk. Eg. Long term bonds seem to be over valued, EU seem weaker with the BREXIT and may trigger the rest of countries to exit euro, euro banks having high NPL, and current monetary policy seem ineffective.
  • Are you only nibbling? Or buying in big quantities? Mind if you share how the allocation of cash in this climate i.e. Your warchest. Small, moderate or large amount of cash allocation?

  • Assi AK
    11:23am
    Assi AK


    There is ample liquidity in the system. With BREXIT, there will probably continue to be more liquidity. Money needs to go somewhere.

    Global economic growth is anemic and the fundamentals are not fantastic. However, money still needs to go somewhere.

    There are relatively inexpensive offers in Singapore's stock market. Despite the negative news, I believe that DBS is now a bargain and at the current price, OCBC is also looking interesting.
    Nibble or gobble? Still nibbling.





What I am more concerned about is where my money should go for it to be treated better. 


Money needs to go somewhere and the next stock market rally here will most likely be a liquidity driven one.

Related post:
BREXIT and AK the investor.

Fixed rates, SIBOR, FHR18 or HDB housing loans?

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Over the last year or so, I received quite a handful of emails and messages from readers on the subject of home loans. I think this blog post is probably overdue.


The banks can come up with fancy acronyms or names for their offers but there are basically two types of home loans: fixed rate or floating rate.






This is my take:

Fixed rates are for people who want to have a higher level of certainty and are quite happy with the lock in period. 

Floating rates are for people who wish to have the flexibility that comes from not having any lock in period.

















I believe that which option we choose should depend on our circumstances, our beliefs and, hence, our strategy.

I choose a floating rate home loan pegged to the 1 month SIBOR (+ 1%) because I believe that I have the resources to pay down my home loan rapidly if interest rates should spike. 

For example, when interest rate on my home loan spiked to 5.1% many years ago, I chose to pay down the loan for my previous home. 

5.1%? Yes, I know this might look unbelievable to younger readers but ask the older folks and they should remember and, for some, it might have even been higher.

However, if I did not have the resources to pay down my home loan, I would have been stuck with the relatively high financing cost. 

I was not eligible to re-finance my home loan as the quantum was lesser than $200K by then. Banks weren't interested in refinancing relatively small loans.


















This was a chat I had recently with a reader:

  • Reader: Hi Ak, are you able to update on your home loan vs bank loan blog. Do you think is advisable to get dbs bank loan. 1st year fhr18 + 0.4%, 2nd year onwards, fhr18 + 1.2%. Lock in for 2 years. Cpf is still 2.6%.

  • Assi AK
    11:16am
    Sounds like a good deal. The worry is the FHR18 and how high it could go but interest rates are likely to stay low for a while.

  • 11:21am
    Reader:


    I read your blog about paying home loan within 10 year. Lower interest. Is there a ideal year that we should finish our loan

    Number of year. Or a formula we can used
  • Assi AK
    11:23am
    10 years was because the fixed rate would end by then.

    It was an offer by POSB.

  • 11:23am
    Reader:


    That offer ended. So this is the current promotion. I hope it wouldn't go up more than 2.6 percent
  • Assi AK
    11:25am
    The first 2 years, you are probably safe but the FHR is floating. So, in the 2nd year, if it does not go to 1.4% or higher, you are safe. Further along the road, it would be harder to say.
  • 11:26am
    Reader:


    So in the other words. Hdb will be a better opinion
  • Assi AK
    11:31am
    Nope. I didn't say that. ;p It depends on our strategy, our circumstances and our beliefs. If we have the resources or are actively preparing the resources to be able to pay down our home loan rapidly in the event interest rates spike up, then, bank loans with the lower interest rates now are viable options to consider. Why not? Remember that once we opt for bank loans, we cannot go back to a HDB home loan.





The offer made to the reader by DBS here is pretty interesting because it is a floating rate with a lock in period of 2 years. Floating rates don't usually have a lock in period. 








What's the catch?

If the FHR18 should spike in these 2 years, bad luck, although it seems unlikely that it would.

What is FHR18?

The FHR18 is basically the interest rate on an 18 months fixed deposit offered by DBS. This is currently at 0.6% per annum. 

So, in the above example, first year interest rate is effectively 1% and for the second year and beyond, effective interest rate is 1.8% as long as the FHR18 stays unchanged.

There are debates on whether using the SIBOR (1 month or 3 months) plus a spread is better or whether FHR18 plus a spread is better. Central to the debates is the matter of transparency with the FHR18 being the winner. 






However, to me, what is more important in the decision making process apart from getting a good deal is to consider our circumstances and what we are able to do in the event that interest rates should spike. 

I always say that we cannot predict but we can prepare. If we are prepared, all is good. Peace of mind is priceless.


Monthly Popular Blog Posts

All time ASSI most popular!

 
 
Bloggy Award