Cost of car ownership skyrocket in Singapore.

Dave Lim, a reader who seems to be to be quite the expert on car ownership in Singapore, weighs in on my last blog on the subject:


Dear AK,
Appreciate your post on car ownership and bringing up some noteworthy points of consideration before one buys a car. You never fail to be honest and wise.

However, being a former hardcore car enthusiast (well, a folly of my younger days – a story for another day), I find that I’m “morally obligated” to call out the glaring factual inaccuracies as evinced in the blogpost by Bullythebear (http://bullythebear.blogspot.sg/2014/03/whats-good-about-owning-car.html#.WWpZFIiGPIV), who doesn’t seem to be too well-versed about cars.

- In order to give decent meaning to numbers, a proper calculation of annual car expenses should take into consideration the depreciation of the car, and not merely the sum of instalments one chooses to pay. It is absolutely futile to discuss car expenses without delving into the interplay of depreciation, COE, OMV and ARF – concepts which the blogger himself were probably unfamiliar with. To add insult to injury, the foregoing discussion was, ironically, featured in a financial blog educating readers about numerical fluency.

- The blogger had grossly oversimplified the types of car expenses. His monthly “running costs” had conveniently left out items like ERP expenses, road tax, car grooming, car inspections, provision for traffic summons and accidents/repairs, and regular wear-and-tear items like tyres, brake discs/pads, mounts, bushings, etc. A total “running cost” of just $500/month ($6,000/yr) is unbelievably optimistic, especially when the estimate is made by a supposedly prudent financial blogger.

- Do we really believe that the total cost of owning a bread-and-butter ride is merely $860 a month? And that of a “flashy car” is just $1,200 a month “all in” as asserted by the blogger? Based on the numbers provided by the blogger, the depreciation cost of his Mazda 2 is already about $6,000/yr ! (*total purchase price of $34,000 incl. interest paid, for 4.8 yrs, assuming a PARF rebate of $6,000)

- I noted that the blogger purchased his ride sometime in early 2012, back when car prices (specifically that in the second-hand market) were still somewhat palatable (https://bullythebear.blogspot.sg/2013/05/reflections-on-owning-car-for-1-yr.html#.WWtU64iGPIU). 

As we know, the environment has changed radically ever since. 

It first began with the drastic cooling measures on vehicle financing introduced by MAS in Feb 2013, which changed the entire playing field. 

Next, in Feb 2014, the new COE categories turned the market topsy turvy. Second hand dealers called the shots in the market, and in 2014, countless numbers of Toyota Vios and Honda Fits started changing hands at $11,000 to $12,000 depreciation. 

Given the high COE (hovering at $70,000 in year 2014), most brand new Korean/Jap models were priced above $11,000 depreciation, excluding interest payable. 

Was anyone still able to purchase a Mazda 2 at $6,000 depreciation in the year 2014? – the odds are almost next to nought, unless we are talking about a lemon sale.

Given the foregoing context, I question the blogger’s intention in writing an article in 2014 to recount his purchase in 2012, and to use it as a premise for telling his readers that he “really think it's affordable for people who wants to get a car.” 

For the avoidance of doubt, the blogger was silent about the cooling measures and changes in COE in his article. At the time of writing his article (Mar 2014), the COE was also at a high of $78,602. (http://www.sgcarmart.com/news/COE_past.php?YR=2014&CAT=a). 

While it is arguably forgivable for him to miss the news about the cooling measures/COE changes, I find it inexcusable and morally irresponsible for him not to check up market prices before telling his readers that is “affordable” to buy cars.

However, to think on the flip side, I could well be wrong about the blogger. He could be a car expert himself, completely au fait with the MAS cooling measures, the COE system and the market prices. The article might then have been written blindly, to reassure and rationalise his buying decision retrospectively. Whatever the reasons behind penning the article, and regardless of how uninspiring his reasons for buying a car might be, it is imperative to highlight the perilously inaccurate and irrelevant contents in his article to avoid misguiding the masses. 

I do not have any personal issues against the blogger and neither do I know who he is or follow his blog actively.

Fast forward to today, the average depreciation of an entry-level bread-and-butter car, old or new, is still $10,000 or more. Followers of the car market would recall that this same amount could get you a Mitsubishi Evo or an entry continental sedan just a few years ago. 

Ever since the blogger wrote his article, petrol duty has risen (an increase of around 20% in fuel price), parking rate has increased by 20%, and as most of us would know, emission taxes will be implemented over the next two years. 

Further and significantly, the financially savvy consumers would know that interest rates have risen – the average car loan interest rate is now at an obscene 3%, equivalent to about 5 or 6 % EIR!*

I will not dwell on details, but the current annual expenses for an entry level ride is about $20,000 to $24,000. Such information is everywhere on the web, in the online forums, and even on the government website – https://www.gov.sg/microsites/whatsyourplan/finances/can-you-truly-afford-a-car-in-singapore )


*AK says readers who are unfamiliar with this issue (i.e. EIR) might want to read this blog:
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2014/04/a-car-loan-is-different-from-home-loan.html

Thank you, Dave. For sure, staying prudent when it comes to big ticket consumption items like cars in Singapore is essential for most of us who are seeking financial freedom in a country which is known to be have one of the highest cost of living in the world.

For readers who are thinking of taking advantage of the relaxed rule for car loans, please read this:
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2016/05/what-new-mas-rules-for-car-loans-mean.html
Financing cost will almost double! 
Related posts:
1. Cooling measures for cars.
2. How much to spend on a car?

How much to spend on a car? Ask 2 questions.

Guy A:
I want to buy a car but my elder brother keeps telling me how expensive it is. He even worked out the depreciation. All in, about $12K a year. I think that is OK.

Guy B:
$12K a year in Singapore for a car is quite normal. My car is about the same.

Guy C:
Can be lesser than $12K a year lah but that is OK for most families.

Is it a good idea to lose $12K a year to own a car?

Hey, having a car definitely improves our quality of life. It is worth it!

Sure or not?

Cannot find an unoccupied seat on the train or bus? 

What?

Cannot even get on the train because too crowded?

What?

Train broke down? Again?

Alamak. 

All these issues are magnified if we are on an outing with children and the elderly. Stop for a moment and imagine that.

I get exhausted just by thinking about it. Shudder. Yes, we have a finite amount of energy too.

Of course, like many people have pointed out, having a car also helps to save lots of time used in travelling. Time is precious.

Here is a something from a fellow blogger whom I respect:

"Financial bloggers are more conservative than the general public. My advice to all financial bloggers is this: 

"Just live life a little."

Read his blog here:
What's good about owning a car?

In my retirement, I don't need a car but I have a car too. It definitely helps to make life more comfortable.

Now, before some start building castles in the air, we really should be asking other questions before we buy a car. I will share two questions in this blog but before I ask them,

Guy A takes home an earned income of $40K a year.

Guy B takes home an earned income of $40K a year and has passive income of $12K a year.

Guy C has no earned income because he is unemployed but he has passive income of $120K a year.

So, what are the questions?

1. Are we using more than 10% of our total income for the car?

Why 10%? For an average young worker, spending $200 per month on transportation is pretty normal, riding mostly on mass transportation and with taxi rides on certain days. Assuming a monthly pay of about $2,000 a month, $200 is about 10%.

2. How much of our total income depends on us holding a job?

Of course, regular readers would be familiar with this line of thought. Try not to consume with our earned income. Instead, invest to have passive income and consume with our passive income.

If being jobless means we have to cut back on our consumption drastically, we might want to think twice about that car.

There are some other things I would consider and if you are interested, please read related posts at the end of this blog.

(This blog was inspired by an email from a reader and my subsequent reply.)
Related posts:
1. Buy a car with 4D winnings.
2. AK learns to embrace YOLO.

https://www.gov.sg/microsites/whatsyourplan/finances/can-you-truly-afford-a-car-in-singapore

Government confiscates our CPF-MA savings when we die.

The following comments are important. 

Important enough to be lifted from the comments section to be shared in a blog so that it reaches more readers who are CPF members.

.




.

.




.

Ignore the rumor mongers but if they are people we care about, we should correct them and hope that they listen.





Related post:
Boost CPF-RA or CPF-MA?

Boost elderly parents' CPF-RA or CPF-MA?

Reader:
Since reading your blog last year (if i only had done so when i first started working years ago!) i have transferred some of my OA to SA and did some cash top up to my SA.

Would appreciate if you can advice on a a dilemma i am facing with regards to whether i should top up CPF for my mum. 





My mum is 63 yro and has almost nothing in her CPF. I had asked CPF Board for advice but it would take a very significant top up (>$50k) to even reach BRS.

i) should i top up my mum CPF's RA? I will not be able to help her reach BRS before she's 65.

ii) Should i top her Medisave instead? My consideration is that this can help go towards MediShield premiums and for any possible medical bills in the future.

I am thinking whether i should put the money in investment say REITs to obtain a potentially higher return than 4% (albeit with higher risks)





AK:
If we do have some spare cash, topping up our elderly parents' CPF accounts (whether RA or MA) is a good idea. 

We can think of this as making the government help us do a better job of taking care of our parents or that the government is helping to lessen the weight on our shoulders.

If you do not have ample resources to top up both the RA and MA, I would imagine that the MA has priority over the RA. 






We do fall sick and this is likely to get more serious with age. 

Having the cost of insurance covered and then some will give peace of mind.

For the elderly with limited financial resources, it should not be about what they could potentially gain. 

It should be about securing returns which are guaranteed. 

Peace of mind is priceless and more so for them.







Related post:
Upsizing parents' retirement adequacy.
You might want to see this recent blog:
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2017/06/what-should-i-do-with-my-bonus.html

Shoebox apartments in Singapore need planters?

Reader:
I have been thinking of getting a shoebox apartment for a while and your blogs on tiny living resonate with me. I have been looking around and I have two options now. Both are about the same size but one of them have a planter that is about 3 meters long by 1 meter wide while the other one does not have a planter nor balcony. I know you have a planter in your apartment and wonder if you would have preferred more indoor space instead.

AK:
Welcome to tiny living! To be honest, before I bought this place, I thought planters and balconies were a waste of space, especially in a tiny apartment.

Hey, less than 500 square feet of space and almost 10% of that that is outside (and the percentage could be even higher for some other projects which is just the developers taking buyers for a ride, I feel)?

Alamak. Singapore so hot and humid. I rather switch on the AC and stay indoors, right?

Anyway, that was before I actually moved in.

After moving in, I realised just how important that outdoor space is.

From a pragmatic angle, it gives me a space to dry my laundry. I get a folding rack and place it in the planter when I need it. After use, rack gets folded flat and stored indoors. 

I could use the dryer function in my washer/dryer but that consumes a lot of electricity and it feels like evaporating money together with the moisture. Don't like that.

From a recreational angle, having some outdoor space is a good idea especially if you are at home a lot like I am. My planter gives me a place to do some gardening and to spend some time outside without leaving home especially on breezier and cooler evenings. 

I have to say that it helps that I am on a high floor and unblocked from all angles. If I could clearly look into my neighbour's home from my outdoor space, I am less likely to use the space. If we can see other people means other people can see us too.

OMG!

You have to remember what a planter in a condo means here. URA wants us to help green Singapore vertically and that is what planters are for. 

Installing some decking over the planter that makes it the same height as the floor of the indoor space is illegal. I know many do it but I don't want to do anything illegal. 

My solution?

I got these from IKEA and lay them on the floor of the planter. It probably costs 5% of what an illegal decking job would have cost too. Cheap and practical just like me. 

Bad AK! Bad AK!

Anyway, whether having a planter makes sense or not for a tiny apartment probably depends on your lifestyle. 

If you go out a lot and are hardly home, maybe, it is not as essential.

Related posts:
1. Shoebox apartment living.
2. Saving on outdoor lights.

"Insurance agent helped himself to my money."

Recently, I met up with a friend whom I have not been in touch with for a few years and, inevitably, we also talked about money matters.

Mania over Chinese art. Huh? I blur.
Friend:
So, how is your investment in Japanese apartments now?

Me:
Oh, you mean Saizen REIT?

Friend:
Ya, you asked me to invest in this that time because it pays good dividends.

Me:
Gone already.

Friend:
Gone?

Me:
Ya, they sold all their assets to an institutional investor.

Friend:
Sounds like you made money!

Me:
OK lah.

Friend:
So lucky. That time I should have listened to you. Shouldn't have listened to my brother's insurance agent and bought the investment from him.

Me:
That was many years ago. How is it?

Friend:
I got fed up with it and sold it at a big loss.

Me: 
But you said that guy is very smart and can help you with your money, right?

Friend:
My brother say one, not me. Ya, very smart but not to help me with my money. Smart to help himself to my money. He left his job liao.

Me:
..................

Friend:
Now, you got any other money making lobang?

Me:
I have some investment in Japanese shopping malls.

Friend:
This time, I am going to invest.

Me:
But it is being sold to another institutional investor too. Not confirmed but it could happen in the next few months and the share price has shot up quite a bit by now.

Friend:
...................


The mood was gradually getting a little bit too heavy for my liking. So, I changed the topic.

My friend regrets investing in something and not investing in something else but is he really an investor? I wonder.

Related posts:
1. How many $29,000 do we have?
"Every year put in money. 20 years..."
2. Bought ILP from a friend.
'...if I cancel the plan now, I (lose) the money...'
3. Saizen REIT.
The investment was a good fit for my motivation.
4. Croesus Retail Trust.
Of course, being paid while waiting is not a bad deal.

Financial security in Singapore plain and simple.

Singapore retrenchment: Will Malaysia share the same fate?






Reader:

I found your blog over the past week, and I have been looking your posts when I have the time.  

I don’t want to be a slave to my job when I am in my late 40s or 50s. 

I know that being an average salaried employee, it is quite difficult to ever be financially free.

Some facts about me:

• Working since 2013, earning $5.7k a month
• 
  
• Save about $900/month in cash
• 
  
• Invest $300/month in STI ETF (I read blogs for beginner investors that said STI ETF as a low risk, simple, long term investment that seemed to be ideal for young investors without much capital)

I have just bought a 3 room BTO for my mom and myself. 

Hence, I have emptied out my OA for house payment and spent my cash savings for renovation. 

In a way, I am starting over from scratch again, with $0 in CPF OA and very little in cash savings.

I understand that since my loan interest rate is much higher than the OA interest rate of 2.5%, I should look to repay the loan as soon as possible (assuming I don't re-finance with a bank loan).
(Parts of the email omitted.)

For only $300, you gain instant diversification.

AK:
What you do depends on what you want to achieve but what you do should also depend on the resources available and your ability to stomach volatility and some risk.

Investing through an STI ETF is good for someone who does not have the inclination nor time to research into specific stocks. 

It is a long term strategy that should yield decent results over a 20 to 30 years period. 

This is your exposure to the local stock market.
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2013/07/tea-with-matthew-seah-posb-invest-saver.html







You can think of the CPF as your exposure to an investment grade sovereign bond. 

In this respect, you might want to use less of your CPF money for housing loan repayment and use more cash instead. 

This will give you better returns than leaving your savings in the bank right away. 

Remember, this is a long term savings tool and you won't be able to access the money till you are 55 and, later, 65.
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2015/11/retire-with-investment-grade-bond-and.html







Of course, please ensure that you have an emergency fund first. 

How big should it be? Read this:
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2015/05/how-much-should-we-have-in-our.html

Also, you want to be adequately insured because you have to take care of your mom. 

I would suggest buying a term life insurance for yourself.
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.sg/2014/09/term-life-insurance-why-buy-term-how.html







We don't need some magic formula or complicated strategies to be more financially secure in Singapore.

Of course, if you decide to become an active investor or trader, you could make more money but you should know if you have the temperament for this. 

That is all I will say. :)







Related post:
Taking steps towards financial security.

See: PMET took a 30% pay cut but thankful.

5 reasons why PMET who took 30% pay cut is thankful (UPDATED).

This is an email from a 37 year old PMET, sharing his experience and thoughts on getting a pay cut:

Reader says...

I recently took up a job offer that pay me 30% less than my previous employment.

I had to look for a new job as my current job is in the oil and gas industry and the office in Singapore might be closing soon.

The new job is much more stable and in view of slower growth in Singapore going forward and me hitting 37, I decided to settle for this job. 

So many stories of PMET with no job I am worried.






Retrenchment On The Rise.

From here, finally I realize and understand what you say in your various blogs. 

Let me highlight a few:

1) My job in the oil and gas sector pays me well. I admit that they are over paying me for what I am doing currently. Hence, I have enjoyed the good years and looking back no regrets.

See:
Find a job that pays you at least what you are worth or better if more. 





2) However, as I have more than 6 months of emergency funds, I was quite relax about this and could take my time to look for a job. 

Just to share, I started looking actively for a new job for 4 months and I only have 2 interviews so far. 

This tell me the economy is not good. 

I realized the prudent habit of myself finally was useful here.

See:
Taking a 30% pay cut is a lot but... 






3) I think you mention before in your blog that even if you don't invest but live prudently, you will not be in a too bad shape if something drastic happens. 

If I no emergency funds then I sure stress. No peace of mind!

See:
Attributes of a wealthy peasant.

4) I have no debt or loans to pay. This gives me peace of mind too.


See:
Becoming richer!






5) I have dividend income from my stocks & REITS. Income investing is important.

With the pay cut, I definitely need to watch my expenses even more but this will not kill me. 

I cannot imagine if I have over stretch my finances what is going to happen to me?

I just like to share and hopefully people will be aware and be more vigilant on their finances.

Lastly thank you for your blog and I have learn so much from you.

See:
Best insurance in life!





Related post:
Holistic approach to a secure future.

Strategies and suggestions for consistent profit.

I approved this friend request on FB and I thought it should be pretty safe since 28 of my FB friends are his friends. So, what happened?

JG:
Hi sir
Thanks for accepting my request 🙂
seems like we have some similar interest
like investing and trading
do you trade in sgx stocks?

AK:
I don't trade much anymore.

JG:
ok
I am from a research expertise firm
we provide trading strategies and suggestions for consistent profit.
would you like to see those strategies?

AK:
nope

JG:
may I know your concern please?

Alamak. Could anyone consistently profit as an investor? Always right and never wrong? Better block.

Related post:
180% to 216% returns annually!

Buying properties with short remaining land leases.

Reader:
I was looking to buy a shoebox condo until I read your blog. 

I turned 35 recently and will try to get my own BTO 2 rm HDB flat. 

This will help me achieve financial freedom earlier. :)


However, a friend (same age) just bought a 40 yro HDB flat. 

He didn't think age was important but I told him about the lease decay issue. 

He cannot sell the flat right away because of the MOP. 

Do you have any thoughts on this?




AK:
I will share what I feel are situations when it might make sense to buy properties with relatively short remaining land leases.

1. If we are making it a home with no intention of reselling or leaving a legacy, make sure that the remaining lease is enough to last us till we are 90 years old. 

People are living longer and we are expected to live till almost 90 these days. 




In fact, to be safe, let's make it 95 years old. 

So, if your friend is 35 and bought a resale flat that has 60 years left to the lease, that is not too bad. 

Well, let us hope he doesn't live to be a hundred. 

Alamak. Bad AK! Bad AK!





2. If we are buying a property with a relatively short remaining land lease as an investment, the rental yield should be far higher than a property that has a longer remaining land lease or is sitting on freehold land.

So, if a property has 50 years left to the lease, it should, simplistically, have a rental yield that is way higher than that of a comparable property with a 100 years left to the lease. 

Otherwise, everything else being equal, it would mean offering a significantly lower price for the property with a shorter remaining land lease.





(There is lesser room for error buying a property with a much shorter remaining land lease. A one year vacancy for a property with a 50 year land lease is 2% of its productive life gone while it is 1% for a property with a 99 year land lease.)

Of course, point number 2 should be relevant to someone considering point number 1 as well. 

It will help to ground us in our decision making process and, hopefully, not pay ridiculously high prices for properties.






Guide for Resale Flat Sellers and Buyers.
Related post:
Buy 99 years LH or FH properties?

Which HDB flat to buy?

Reader says:

I have read your posts and have been following you for quite some time. 

Have been reading your posts on purchasing properties and following up on the replies. Really interesting :) 

I would like to seek your advice for choosing a HDB flat. Hope you don’t mind helping me out.





I want to buy a flat that is more accessible and convenient, closer to the central region. 

I plan to sell the unit after 5 years of stay when my financial is ready for an upgrade. 

However the flats in the estate I am interested in are older. 

My agent keeps telling me NE region is newer and have more potential.






I really like the 20 year old resale flat which is closer to town but for the same price, I can get a 5 year old flat in NE Singapore.

I feel that the flat in NE is not so convenient even with the LRT lines and bus service there. 

It is still quite a distance away from central area.

For the amount of money I can afford I know I can’t get both new and centralised HDB flat, 鱼和熊掌不可兼得.. Please teach me how to 取舍..





AK says:

If you are buying a home to stay for the rest of your life, an older flat which has more than 70 years left to the lease is OK.

If you are thinking of selling the flat a few years down the road, an older flat could have issues especially now that more people are aware of what a shorter lease means.

You decide. ;)






Related posts:
1. HDB flat is 37 years old...
2. Buying a 99 years LH property?
3. Buy resale flat or new BTO flat?
Which one would AK choose?

A great crash is coming and I am ready (UPDATED).

Reader says...
Grateful if you could please talk to yourself on what are criteria for stock selection when buying stocks using my CPF OA?

Given that cpf money is sacrosanct, naturally we have to be more selective and careful.

Grateful for your self talk please?







AK says...

CPF-OA money? 

It is quite simple. 

I wait for a market crash. ;)







Is a market crash coming soon? 

Your guess is as good as mine.

I cannot predict a crash. 

I can only prepare for one.

WAH!!!

Say:

"I am ready for a great crash."

How to have peace of mind as investors?
I explained how the CPF-OA money should be the last war chest we use because it earns 2.5% per annum in interest, risk free.





I also said many times before not to borrow money for investments.

The reason is simple.

We don't want to be caught in a situation where we might have to liquidate our investments at times and prices not of our own choosing.

If a market crash happens, we would be glad we did not borrow any money to invest with.

There is no free lunch in this world.

Banks (and brokerages) are fair weather friends.






Related posts:
1. Simple investment wisdom.
2. Holistic approach.
A bird in hand is worth two in the bushes (provided that they are of the same size). If AK says so, it must be so.

Vote for or against selling Croesus Retail Trust?

Some might remember that the money I used to invest in Croesus Retail Trust was mostly from selling 90% of my investment in Sabana REIT a few years ago.

Since my investment in Sabana REIT was as big as my investment in AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT, the amount of money involved was pretty big for an average retail investor.

For those who have been following my moves over the years, they would know that I got into Sabana REIT at depressed prices, collected dividends over a 3 year period and sold as its unit price retreated from a high on the back of various red flags. 

Off the top of my head, I probably made about 13% per annum from my investment in Sabana REIT, all in.

Getting into Croesus Retail Trust after its price retreated significantly from its post IPO euqhoria and also by taking advantage of the rights issues later, I am probably looking at a total return of between 70% to 100% for the investments made at different times. 

On an annual basis, if I were to accept the offer of $1.17 a unit, the return on investment is probably between 17% to 60% per year. 






OK, please note that all numbers are off the top of my head and are only approximately right.

Now, quite understandably, not everyone is happy with the offer to take over Croesus Retail Trust at $1.17 a unit. We would be losing a good investment for income, after all.

A few readers wrote to me, asking if I would vote against the sale and a couple of readers also asked that I mobilize my army of readers to vote against the sale.

 ------------

------------

Alamak. AK is just another retail investor. AK is no king maker. So stressful.

Seriously, I will not ask anyone to vote for or against the sale but I will share a few points to put things in perspective.

1. With a DPU of about 8c, at 85c a unit, we were looking at a yield of 9.4%. At $1.17, we are looking at 6.8%. Yield has compressed by quite a fair bit.

2. Gearing is almost 50%, if I remember correctly. So, much of the yield we see is leveraged yield. If we should reduce leverage and that is possible through equity fund raising, distribution yield would drop. That makes for a fairer comparison against some retail S-REITs which have less than 40% in gearing.






3. It is not useful to say that $1.17 is X% higher than its price from X months ago. We should be interested in value. $1.17 is about 20% higher than the NAV per unit. 

Now, if we remember, Saizen REIT was bought over at a premium of about 3% above NAV and that was when I thought Saizen REIT's properties were probably worth more than what was carried in the books too. Also, remember, Saizen REIT's gearing was much lower than 50%.

4. It is true that even a compressed distribution yield of 6.8% is higher than comparable J-REITs' yields but we have to remember that the rules governing J-REITs are different which was an important reason why Croesus Retail Trust decided to list in Singapore. If they were to list in Japan, their DPU and, consequently, their distribution yield would have been lower.






Unfortunately, investors of Saizen REIT grew weary of waiting for value to be unlocked and agreed to its sale of assets. 

What about investors of Croesus Retail Trust? Obviously, many have a different attitude and are more willing to wait for a better offer, if any. Of course, being paid while waiting is not a bad deal.

This is interesting to me because Saizen REIT was a big investment for me and Croesus Retail Trust is a big investment for me too. I wonder.

Related post:
History with CRT and current thoughts.
"I like what I see. So, I stay invested."