The email address in "Contact AK: Ads and more" above will vanish from November 2018.

PRIVACY POLICY

FAKE ASSI AK71 IN HWZ.

Featured blog.

1M50 CPF millionaire in 2021!

Ever since the CPFB introduced a colorful pie chart of our CPF savings a few years ago, I would look forward to mine every year like a teena...

Past blog posts now load week by week. The old style created a problem for some as the system would load 50 blog posts each time. Hope the new style is better. Search archives in box below.

Archives

"E-book" by AK

Second "e-book".

Another free "e-book".

4th free "e-book".

Pageviews since Dec'09

Financially free and Facebook free!

Recent Comments

ASSI's Guest bloggers

If we want peace, be prepared for war!

Thursday, January 24, 2013


Next crash to be worse than 2008.

I had an email exchange with a reader who, amongst other things, asked me to elaborate on an often used phrase in my writings. I feel that his questions are pertinent and as there could be other readers who might have similar questions, publishing our exchange is probably a good idea.




Reader:

Hello Mr AK71, .... I am an avid reader of your ASSI blog.

First I want to say a big thank you for the many posts you have written, they have been extremely insightful to so many of us who are still learning about investing. Your guidance and advice is very much appreciated.


I have a question regarding a piece of investing advice you gave us some time ago, I hope you can enlighten us!

In several of your posts earlier this year and last year, you mentioned that we should always have a "war chest" ready should good opportunities come and we can use it generate good returns. ie buying low.

My first question is, what would you say will be a good percentage ( of one's total assets used for investing, ie both cash and stock ) for a person to put aside for such an opportunity ?

My 2nd question is, surely the opportunities you mentioned come once in a blue moon ( ie during times of recession, etc, ), and for small time investors such as myself, putting aside a considerable amount of cash while waiting for such opportunities seems "wasted" when it can be put into actual investments to generate passive income in the meantime.

To paraphrase, I fully understand your idea of a warchest, but I am in a dilemma as I would like to utilize all my available funds I have set aside for investing to maximize my passive income, and setting aside a considerable amount of cash while waiting for such opportunities doesn't seem like the best use of my money.

What is your take on this ?

I have one final question - Would you recommend investing using the extra cash one have in cpf ? ( the money after all, is just sitting there. )

I was thinking of investing it in relatively safe assets like SREITS.

Thank you so much for your time.





Lake Ashi, Hakone, Japan.


My reply:

I am glad you have enjoyed my blog and found the posts insightful. :)

I also have questions for you.

Do you believe in insurance?

When we buy insurance, we are protecting ourselves against bad things which could happen. If we know that bad things would definitely happen, would we buy insurance? More so, we would buy insurance, wouldn't we?

A war chest is like having insurance. Do you think there would be another bear market? If you think there would be, why won't you need to have a war chest?

If you think this through, you would realise the importance of having a war chest (or a few).

How large should your war chest be? This is up to you. It should be large enough to make a difference during bad times but not so large as to make you feel uncomfortable. It is a very personal decision.

I won't recommend you do or not do anything with your CPF-OA. 


I will only say that my CPF-OA money stands ready only to be used when there are compelling investment opportunities. In the meantime, it earns 2.5% per annum risk free.






Reader's reply:

Hello Mr AK, thank you so much for your reply.

I have never thought about my "war chest" as a form of insurance, but more as a liquid asset that I can use for investment. Your advice has indeed given me something to think about. :]

As to investing with my CPF, I will give it more careful thought, and also do some more research and homework first.

Please feel free to publish our exchange if you think it might help fellow readers out there. As you mentioned, I'll feel more comfortable staying anonymous. :]

Once again, thank you so much for time and advice. Your blog continues to be a source of great inspiration and knowledge.





AK's final word on the matter:
We would do well to remember that if we want peace, we must be prepared for war. If we want to be richer, we need a war chest.


Related posts:
1. Be cautious as we accept higher risks.
2. Never lose money in S-REITs?
3. SRS, CPF-OA, CPF-SA. (Note publishing date.)
4. AK71's simple strategy.

China Minzhong: Going higher to $1.22 - $1.46!

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

I received an email and a very interesting chart on China Minzhong from a reader, RayNg, this evening.

See what he had to say:

Historically, Mr. Market paid ~10X PER during the first 2 years of IPO. It went down south due to EU crisis and bearish outlook of China economy. I think the main concern is its high account receivable (double from fy11).

However, the fy13, its account receivable and cashflow is back to norm and this might ease investors’ concern.




CMZ’s current PE is ~ 4X (base on EPS of 0.244). If Mr. Market is willing to pay 5X or 6X, then its potential share price will be $1.22 and $1.46, respectively. I think this is possible because China has bottomed out and is in recovery phase. In fact, looking at past 3Q/fy13 result, I believe its EPS will be > 0.244.

I bought some shares during the consolidation period (Jun-Aug 2012) when the price was ranging around 55-65c. That was the time when the PE was ~3X. The reason I bought this counter is because it has good fundamentals, low PE with high ROE, strong balance sheet (retain earning) and low gearing ratio. Still holding.

Yes, I do have some concern on S-chips as most people are very scared of S-chips.

So, let us see if Mr. market is willing to pay 5-6X PER for China Minzhong's shares.

RayNg

Related post:
China Minzhong: Breakout or fake out?

Slaving to stay in a condominium.
(Sanity check in the comments section. Please read.)


"House poor is no fun."
UPDATE (JUNE 2018):

A reader sent this to me:



Reader says...
Monthly income of $3500 can own a condo 😱

AK says...
Slave for life lor... House poor. Cham like that.

Salesman only wants to sell... 

We buy already is our problem liao. 😛

When we buy anything with borrowed money from banks, we don't actually own it until the loan is fully paid up. 

We might have control but we don't have ownership. 

This is why most people don't receive the original title deed to their homes until their golden years. 😉





UPDATE (DECEMBER 2016):

Why are you borrowing?

Borrowing money for important things like buying a home may be unavoidable. But getting into debt is also a major responsibility. Too much debt can easily get us in trouble.
Avoid the debt trap by controlling how much you borrow. Even if you qualify for a bigger loan, ask yourself whether you really need the item you are buying and whether you can really afford the debt repayments (on top of all your existing debts and expenses). Consider buying it another day, perhaps after saving up for some or all of it first. Interest charges and the extra you pay in instalment plans over time can add up to a lot more than you think.
-----------------------
In my memory, there were two people I knew whose families squeezed out all the money they could just to buy and stay in condominiums. 

One person was a schoolmate in junior college and another was a colleague during my stint in National Service.

I remember both as being extremely frugal and I always wondered why being people who stayed in condominiums were they so poor. 





Of course, those were days when I was a financial ignoramus.

Now, although I think that frugality is a virtue, it is a virtue when we are so without being forced to be so. 

If we had a choice and we chose to be frugal, good. 

However, if we are frugal because we don't have a choice, that is misery on earth!






I remember when I talked to both of them, they gave me almost identical answers. 

Yes, I was a nosey kid. 

Their families had to make hefty monthly repayments to the banks. 

So, they had to be very careful with their money.


Although I have suggested that investing in properties could give us a leg up in our wealth building efforts, I believe that buying properties without any margin of safety is foolhardy.





Basically, if we had to take the maximum of 80% LTV allowed in order to buy a property and if the monthly repayment was an amount that would lead to a very frugal lifestyle which was not by choice as a result, we should not buy the property. 

It could be within our means by conventional definition but this is one example of how we should not succumb to conventions.





Buying properties in Singapore has been seen as the way to riches. 

To many ordinary Singaporeans, buying a condominium for self-stay seems to be a natural first step.

I will share these thoughts:

1. Like I said, if we have no choice but to be frugal in life, that is utter misery! If to stay in a condominium, we are forced to live like paupers, the price is too high.





2. We have to remember that our homes do not generate cashflow. So, a home is not really an investment. It is consumption

So, just like anything we consume in life, make sure we do not spend beyond our means. 

In fact, we should not just spend within our means. We should spend well within our means.


Of course, our homes might have the unique property (pun unintended) of being able to appreciate in price over time which makes them unique in the world of consumption but it does not detract from the fact that our homes are not investments but consumption.





3. Borrowing to the max with no reserves means there is no margin of safety.

Probably, a $3,000+ monthly repayment on a 30 years loan of $800,000 is manageable for a couple who is making some $8,000 in combined gross monthly income. 

Now, we have lots of cheap money sloshing around, after all.


What happens when the party stops? 

What if interest rates go up just 1% which means almost a doubling from current levels? 

What if the economy goes into recession and home values decline? 

What if the couple were to be retrenched?





I won't talk about whether it is a good time or bad time to buy a condominium in this blog post. 

I will, however, say that we must be very careful or we could end up slaving just to stay in a condominium. 

Surely, this is more so for new condominium buyers who intend to be owner-occupiers today.





Related posts:
1. Good debt is always good?
2. Affordability of housing in Singapore.
3. More cooling measures on the way?

China Minzhong: Breakout or fake out?

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

There was a bit of excitement in the price action of China Minzhong towards the end of the day. It broke the long term resistance provided by the declining 100w MA to touch a high of $1.05.

Daily chart.

However, volume was lower than the day before and without higher volume, share price closed at $1.025 or just one bid under the long term resistance. A long legged white spinning top was formed in the process, suggesting that bulls and bears are evenly matched.

Weekly chart.

With three more sessions to go this week, we could see a new high in China Minzhong's share price if volume expands while it continues to push higher.

That volume was lower suggests that many are waiting on the sides to see who would win the tug of war.

A convincing break above resistance would invite a mad rush from the bulls. An obvious decline would invite a mad rush from the bears.

Which camp do you think I am in?

Related post:
China Minzhong: Partial divestment at $1.01.

Cache Logistics Trust: 4Q DPU 2.154c.


Full year distributable income improved 9.5% while full year net property income improved 11.7%.

However, full year DPU improved by a very much smaller 1.6%.

Why do investors like Cache Logistics Trust? Some reasons could be:

1. 100% occupancy rate.

2. Only 2% of lettable space is up for lease renewal this year.

3. Weighted average lease to expiry: 3.9 years.

At $1.27 per unit, annualised, distribution yield is 6.78%. This is much lower than Sabana REIT's but Cache Logistics Trust offers greater certainty and that alone would command a premium.

A more interesting question is whether the size of the premium is justifiable. That is another exercise in subjectivity.

Gearing is higher now at 31.7% which, however, is still comfortable.

Related post:
Cache Logistics Trust: DPU down 5%.

Vote and win cash prizes!

Make some people insanely famous!


Vote for your favourite and win cash prizes!

Go to:
Vote: Kinder Bueno Mashine mash-up and win!

Voting period: 22nd January 2013 to 5th February 2013.


Monthly Popular Blog Posts

All time ASSI most popular!

 
 
Bloggy Award