Noble Group

A friend told me recently that Noble Group was 9c a share in 1999. It closed the 2009 at $3.25. That's a 36x returns over 10 years!!! I've not done any research on any financial engineering the company might have done in the last 10 years. So, this observation might be too simplistic.

Looking at the numbers, I find valuation for Noble rather mind boggling. To buy at the current valuation, one must be extremely optimistic about the future earnings of the company. Well, Jim Rogers thinks that prices of commodities will continue to rise in the years ahead. If we believe him, then, it might be better to buy directly into commodities or companies producing these commodities rather than commodities trading companies. I remember Musicwhiz did some FA on Noble and Olam. So, I shan't go into details here. The link to his blog is in my blogroll. As is my style, if the FA fails, I do not bother to go on to the next step which is to do a TA.

However, what worries me is that even some usually very cautious investors I know are euphoric about Noble. From a TA standpoint, if the trend is not broken, continue riding it. Having said this, Noble's rapid climb in price does not look sustainable. So, I'm doing a TA out of curiosity. The negative divergence between price and volume on the weekly chart is quite plain to see. After breaking multiple wMAs in May, it tested the 100wMA support in July and off it went hugging the upper limits of the Bollinger bands since. The shorter term 20wMA has pulled away from the longer term 100wMA and 200wMA. The spread is now quite susbtantial. Using two sets of Fibo lines, it looks as if the current price of $3.25 is at resistane. A pullback is on the cards but with such positive sentiments bouying the counter, the 20wMA, at $2.70 this week, might just be able to support the price. That would be a 15% pullback. To my friends who are vested, stay vigilant. If the 20wMA breaks, there is quite a fair bit to fall.

Bungee jumping, anyone?

Under normal circumstances, if we were given a choice to stay safely on land or to jump off a bridge, I think we would choose to stay on land. If we were guaranteed safety if we were to jump off a bridge and collect an experience of a lifetime, would we do it? Many still wouldn't or else bungee jumping would become a very common pastime.

Last night, I had dinner with a few friends and as usual, we talked about investments as well. We all have friends who are very risk averse and would rather leave their money in the banks and collect 0.125% interest p.a. Some are "smarter" and leave their money in one year fixed deposits and collect 0.7% interest p.a. Now, we are talking about people with excess cash, beyond what they need in the event of unemployment over a period of 6 months. They are safely on land or so they think.

The threat of wealth erosion by inflation is very real and leaving our hard earned money in bank accounts to collect <1% p.a. isn't the wisest thing to do. The Monetary Authority of Singapore lifted its 2010 inflation forecast to between 2.5 and 3.5% on 19 Nov 2009. Land we were standing on which seemed firm just now might quickly become quicksand. Jim Rogers says that the worst thing to be in now is cash. It's perhaps an exaggeration but I think we get the idea.

There are many financial instruments which would "guarantee" higher returns but few would provide the liquidity which the stock market has. All financial instruments carry an element of risk to varying degrees. Make no mistake, the stock market has plenty of risks but it also has ample rewards for those who are equipped properly to traverse the difficult terrain. Having the right skills and, dare I say, right companions would make the journey a smoother one. Ultimately, do our due diligence and make our own decisions. We have no one to blame for our failures but ourselves.

There are many reasons why people would not venture into the stock market. Fear of losing money is probably the main reason. Not everyone has the mental strength to overcome this fear to move their money out of their "risk free" savings accounts into the stock market. We have friends who say they "cannot lose a single cent" and that they "would lose sleep at night if they have money in the stock market". It would be better to leave them be. Till this day, I have not had the good fortune of knowing anyone who had only made money in the stock market and did not lose a single cent. People who ask for 100% safety for their money (in nominal value) would have to settle for <1% annual yield.
Things Singaporean: SRS, CPF-OA and CPF-SA.