The email address in "Contact AK: Ads and more" above will vanish from November 2018.

PRIVACY POLICY

FAKE ASSI AK71 IN HWZ.

Featured blog.

1M50 CPF millionaire in 2021!

Ever since the CPFB introduced a colorful pie chart of our CPF savings a few years ago, I would look forward to mine every year like a teena...

Past blog posts now load week by week. The old style created a problem for some as the system would load 50 blog posts each time. Hope the new style is better. Search archives in box below.

Archives

"E-book" by AK

Second "e-book".

Another free "e-book".

4th free "e-book".

Pageviews since Dec'09

Financially free and Facebook free!

Recent Comments

ASSI's Guest bloggers

Showing posts with label First REIT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label First REIT. Show all posts

In conversation with AK 2019 (Part 2).

Thursday, August 1, 2019

Reader #1 says...
Do you feel that there’s a REIT in Singapore which we could buy and hold forever?

AK says...
I thought I could hold First REIT forever.

I changed my mind. 😜

Now, I wonder if I could hold AA REIT forever?

I think we have to be prepared for changes because they do happen.

Related post:

Largest investments updated (3Q 2019).








Reader #2 says...
I noticed that you hardly talked about Forex Trading.

May I know if you could share your thoughts on it?

Actually I’m asking this because one of my friends is doing it and he advertised it on his Facebook recently

AK says...
FOREX trading.

Hmm.

I dunno anything about trading in currencies.

It isn't something I can value.

I made a mention of this in my blogs on Bitcoin.

Bad AK! Bad AK! 😛


Related post:
My final word on Bitcoin and friends.





Reader #3 says...
Now lippo seems to hv "fixed" the mess.

U think for ppl like me who never get (First REIT), can consider?


Can heal?


AK says...
Bandaged :p

You see my blog on why I sold and you decide for yourself. 😉

Related post:
Sold First REIT.






Reader #4 says...
AK, I want to show my friend your $1m CPF meme but the link is gone. 
Send it to me ok?

AK says...
Sure. 
Hope you song song gao Jurong. ;p

See:
This guy has $800K in his CPF (AK responds to HWZ forum).




Been a while since I took a photo of my breakfast.


Two hard boiled eggs eaten with a sprinkling of salt and black pepper.

A glass of warm water infused with ginseng roots.

New readers might want to read:
You are not successful in Singapore unless you do this!




Sold First REIT to raise funds.

Friday, November 2, 2018

The plan was to blog about this together with my quarterly passive income report (4Q 2018) but I decided to take some time off from Neverwinter to do this earlier.

I have been invested in First REIT since before the Global Financial Crisis and, increasing my investment during the crisis and Mr. Market's bouts of depression, it became a rather significant investment in my portfolio.


First REIT has been an amply rewarding investment for income as I did nothing but received income distributions in the following 10 years and more, enjoying yield very much in excess of 10% per year.

As an investment for income, First REIT's performance has been stellar.





Why then did I decide to sell my investment in the REIT?

I said in my last blog on First REIT that if we feel that the REIT's income stream is in peril or if we are not ready for rights issues, we should not invest in the REIT.

The concern that LPKR (which accounts for more than 80% of the REIT's income) might default is a reasonable one as they are struggling with a weak Rupiah.





Although I do not feel that there is any risk of an imminent default and LPKR has also announced plans to improve its financial health which includes sale of assets, realistically, LPKR must negotiate to pay a lower rent to First REIT as long as the Rupiah remains weak.

Naturally, everything else remaining equal, when this happens, it should translate to a lower DPU.

Don't ask me when it might happen or how much the reduction might be but investors should be prepared for the eventuality.





As for rights issues, investors in First REIT should be prepared too because OUE's strategy is to go asset light and OUE Lippo Healthcare's relatively big portfolio of assets in Malaysia, China and Japan will eventually be sold to First REIT.

Although First REIT's current gearing level is relatively healthy and it will be able to take on more debt for acquisitions, it will still need to do some equity fund raising which means either private placements or rights issues.

Yes, in the plural.





In my last blog on First REIT, I said I was not adding to my investment in the REIT but I was quite happy to hold on to my investment.

My investment in First REIT has been free of cost for quite a while now and a lower DPU does not really worry me.

I am always ready for rights issues and the prospect of a rights issue or a few does not worry me either.

However, recently, Mr. Market made me too many tempting offers in the non-REITs space and unwilling to dig deeper into my war chest, I decided to sell my investment in First REIT to raise funds instead.





Why not reduce my investment in AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT which is quite a bit larger than my investment in First REIT?

Well, if I must choose, I would always choose to sell what I feel is a more uncertain investment and First REIT's future income seems less certain compared to AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT's.

What have I been buying recently?

Hint.







Back to Neverwinter for me now.

Related post:
Why First REIT and why worry?

Why First REIT and why worry?

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

I get asked from time to time why I invest in First REIT and not Parkway Life REIT?

Actually, more accurately, people should ask why did I invest in First REIT and not Parkway Life REIT?

Yes, asking when a decision was made matters.






When I was deciding between First REIT and Parkway Life REIT, the choice was a much simpler one.

First REIT was trading at a big discount to NAV and its distribution yield was much higher compared to Parkway Life REIT.

Money should go to where it is treated best, I told myself then.






So, if you guess my entry prices were very low, you are right.

Actually, no need to guess because I have blogged about this before.

As First REIT's unit price has been declining, many readers have asked me if it is a good time to buy more.

My response was rather predictable.






"I don't know if it is a good time to buy more for you.

"I only know it is not a good time to buy more for me.


"Have a plan, your own plan."


It does not fit into my plan to buy more First REIT but I am more than happy to hold on to what I have.








Even if First REIT should see a 20% decline in unit price or even a 30% in unit price today, it would still be higher than my entry prices.

However, for someone who decides to invest in First REIT today, surely, he would not feel indifferent if such big declines in the REIT's unit price should happen.

A big decline in unit price could happen if First REIT's largest tenant, LPKR, which is feeling the strain of a falling Rupiah, should default on rental payment

For sure, I do not know if this is going to happen.




I do know that investing in First REIT, more than ever, investors have to be ready for rights issues with a new pipeline of assets in Japan, China and Malaysia from OUE Lippo Healthcare which is taking over the management of the REIT.

If we believe that First REIT's income stream is in peril and if we do not like the idea of a big rights issue, then, we should not be investing in First REIT.

Why worry?





Related post:
Free income producing assets.

Free income producing assets. You want?

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

Has it really been 10 years since the Global Financial Crisis?

Time really flies.

What triggered this blog post?

Messages from two readers.

Reader #1 says...
First Reit dropped quite a bit recently.

Not sure if it is due to rising interest rates.

Am thinking of buying more for retirement income.

What is your view? Thanks.

AK says...
I have not been paying attention but it is probably because I am not thinking of adding.






Reader #2 says...
BTW i was looking to increase my shares in first Reit but Cloudy Outlook On Sponsor Ownership for them made me feel wary.

not sure will it be market noisy or a good opportunity.

current price was my entry price years ago.

AK says...
I haven't been paying attention to First REIT much because my entry prices were so low. 😛






Of course, regular readers know that no matter how sneaky they are, they cannot out sneak AK.

Trying to get me to tell you to buy or to sell?

Sneaky!

OK, I know.

Bad AK! Bad AK!

Anyway, sneaky AK has a few things to say in this blog.






1. Ignore the noise.

When I bought First REIT in a big way and blogged about it, I received messages from people telling me not to.

I ignored them.

It wasn't the first time and it wasn't the last time.

As long as we feel that we have our facts and reasons right, ignore the noise.





The fact that many people disagree with us does not mean that we are wrong.

Of course, we might not always be right but if we spend our time listening to the noise, it messes up our minds.

We might not always make the best decisions but if we are approximately right more often than we are wrong, it is good enough.






2. Time matters.

I have been invested in First REIT for many years and it is probably as old an investment as AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT in my portfolio.

It is an investment that generates income for me year after year.

The longer I stay invested in First REIT, the safer the investment becomes.

In a blog published in 2010, I said that my investment in First REIT made during the Global Financial Crisis would be free of cost in five and a half years.





In fact, I have recovered all of my capital and more by now.

This is including investments made in First REIT before the Global Financial Crisis.


Want an absolutely free of cost investment that generates a regular income?

Unless we are lucky enough to inherit income producing assets, with some work and a healthy dose of luck, dreams do come true.


I haven't been paying attention to the share price for a long time.

Why?








When we buy an asset, thinking about its income generating ability, we are investors.

We should be able to value the asset and decide on how much is worth paying for it.

When we buy an asset simply because people who bought such an asset made money in the past or because everyone else is buying it now, we are speculators and more concerned with prices.






Of course, both investors and speculators, if they know what they are doing, can make money.

I am both investor and speculator although I invest more than I speculate these days.


So, to buy more First REIT (or any other asset) or not to buy?

First ask if you are an investor or speculator?







Related posts:
1. First REIT is for keeps.
2. Investing or speculating?

Understated gains from Saizen REIT.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

For a while, I have suspected that ASSI has stalkers but the following can only happen because this stalker happens to be a friend. If he were just any other reader, I would freak out.

Reader:

I believe you made in mistake calculating your gains from Saizen. 


Just letting you know. You see if you want to amend.

"How much space is enough?"

AK:

I checked the numbers again. You are right!


Spooky!!!

I think I mixed up my average cost price for Saizen REIT with First REIT's.

So, $245,000 is too low.

It should be $30,000 to $40,000 higher.

So, the returns, in terms of percentage, should be higher. Maybe more than 25% a year.

Too lazy to come up with the exact figures. Of course, this shouldn't surprise you. LOL.

I will publish a blog as an errata. Thanks.

This is a very good reminder to everyone that ASSI is not very reliable. If you have yet to read the ASSI disclaimer, it is at the bottom of the blog.

If you choose to eavesdrop on AK talking to himself, do it at your own risk.

What? You are like AK? Too lazy to scroll to the bottom to read?

I reproduce it here:

"The ideas expressed in this blog should not be construed as an enticement to buy or sell the securities, commodities or assets mentioned. The accuracy or completeness of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. Readers should carry out independent verification of information provided. No warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss howsoever arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of actions taken based on ideas and information found in this blog."


Related post:
How much did AK make from Saizen REIT?

Healthway Medical and free money from Lippo. (Renamed "OUE Lippo Healthcare Limited".)

Sunday, March 5, 2017

Donkey years ago, I invested in Healthway Medical Corporation (HMC). 

I liked the numbers and I thought it was relatively undervalued compared to peers.


Anyway, I got in at 10 cents a share and was mostly divested by the time its share price doubled months later.





Some of my comments from 2009.
Unfortunately, HMC had troubles later on and the last time I looked at it, its PE ratio was 100x or more. 

I still have a very small position in HMC made up of scrip dividends collected over the years. 

Free of cost to me and mostly forgotten, the shares are not worth very much today.





Although HMC's performance has been inconsistent, booking a huge impairment recently, the Lippo Group is making a takeover offer of 4.2c a share. 

They are the same people behind First REIT which is one of my largest investments and, of course, OUE Limited. 
I like to think that the Lippo Group know what they are doing and that they think they could transform the potential they see in HMC. 

Sounds familiar? 

Yes, that is OUE Limited's slogan: 

"Viewing every development as an opportunity to transform its potential."






Like I said, I have a very small stake that is free of cost. 

If HMC has a chance at being transformed and of doing better in future at the hands of the Lippo Group, I want a share, no matter how small it is. 

So, I am not accepting the offer.




Increased investment in Religare Health Trust (RHT) by more than 150%.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Religare Health Trust's (RHT) latest results missed expectations but yesterday's massive decline in its unit price was surprising and, I thought, excessive.

The sale of a 51% stake in FHTL impacted RHT's income. 

Distributing the proceeds as a special dividend also meant that its NAV per unit declined to 83.8c. 




DPU for the quarter ended 31 Dec 16 was 1.25c, a big year on year decline of almost 31% but most of it should be expected because of a reduced contribution from FHTL. 

Without accounting for this, however, DPU would still have reduced by a few percentage points (i.e. pretending that RHT did not sell a 51% stake in FHTL). 

Trying to figure out how much is a reasonable price to pay for RHT, I referred to my long time healthcare REIT investment, First REIT. 




At $1.27 per unit, First REIT offered a distribution yield of about 6.7%. 

RHT's gearing level is 26.6% while First REIT's gearing level is 31.1% (perpetual bonds lowered gearing ratio from 34.4% to 30.0% last year). 

So, First REIT should offer a higher yield since it is more highly geared.

Nonetheless, if we expect a quarterly DPU of 1.25c from RHT to be the norm from now (however unlikely), with an annual DPU of 5c, to get a 6.7% distribution yield or more, a unit price of 74.5c or lower is required.



Although surprised by the speed and depth of the plunge in unit price, as I already had an idea of what was probably a pretty reasonable price to pay, I simply acted and more than doubled my investment in RHT.
All else being equal, the additional investment I made in RHT will offer a distribution yield of about 6.9% which is probably quite decent for a healthcare REIT now.

One reason why I decided to invest in RHT was discovering how India was not doing enough to provide healthcare for her people. 




I found out from watching an interview with an Indian Nobel prize winner. 

My independent research since then tells me again and again that there is a lot of room for growth in India's health care sector. 

An example of my research:
Source: The Hindu, 13 Sep 16.
I believe that RHT's income would improve in the next couple of years not only because of increasing fees but also because almost 600 beds will be added by development projects to be completed as well as asset enhancement initiatives (AEI) in existing assets.





A child cannot throw a tantrum forever because the child will run out of energy, grow tired and stop. 

Mr. Market is no different.



Source: DBS Research, 7 Feb 17.
Read the companion blog on investor psychology: HERE. 
First REIT's presentation: HERE.
RHT's presentation: HERE.

Hock Lian Seng returns 100% and more!

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

One of the things that I like to do is to buy into what looks like a fundamentally sound business when insiders are accumulating. One such stock which has amply rewarded me over the years is Hock Lian Seng.

I already had a small position in Hock Lian Seng but decided to buy more in 2011 when I observed insiders buying. Back then, I paid 24c a share. 





Fully confident that the company would be able to continue with a dividend per share (DPS) of 1.5c, I was looking at a dividend yield of 6.25% back then. That was in October 2011. Read blog: here.

A few months later in February 2012, Hock Lian Seng declared a DPS of 2c which translated to a dividend yield of 8.33%! That it represented only 32.8% of earnings was pleasing. 





They were retaining earnings which increased the value of the stock. Read blog: here.

In both 2013 and 2014, Hock Lian Seng declared a DPS of 1.8c. In between, I had an opportunity to add to my investment, paying 26c a share in May 2013, confident that a DPS of 1.5c remained undemanding. Anything more would have been a bonus. I was not disappointed. Read blog: here.





Almost a year later in February 2014, Mr. Market gave me a chance to buy again cheaply. That time, I paid 25.5c a share. I would have liked to accumulate more later on but Hock Lian Seng received positive media coverage by end of 2014 and its share price quickly rose. Read blog: here.

In 2015, Hock Lian Seng declared a DPS of 4c! Mr. Market's exuberance went through the roof!

I cautioned that the 4c DPS was a one off event and unlikely to be recurring as Hock Lian Seng saw its share price rocketing. 






Too many analysts and investors were waving the 4c DPS around as if it was a regular event. 

I won't be surprised if there were many newly minted Hock Lian Seng investors that year. 

I did not add to my investment but, throughout the buzz, I held on to my investment and enjoyed a dividend yield of 15.38% to 16.66% that year. Read blog: here.





In 2016, Hock Lian Seng declared a more normalised DPS of 2.5c. Mr. Market wasn't enthused and its share price reflected the mood. However, its share price did not go below 30c. If it did, I would have bought more. 

Of course, it stands to reason that Hock Lian Seng should not trade at below 30c a share. It is a more valuable company today than it was in 2011 from retaining earnings for so many years.






Yes, on top of the dividends I have received over the years from Hock Lian Seng, my stake in the business has also appreciated in value. The total return has been more than satisfactory.

Hock Lian Seng's sound fundamentals might have caught the attention of Mr. Market and its share price recently went ballistic. 


I don't pretend to understand everything but I understand that selling about half of my investment in Hock Lian Seng would make my remaining investment free of cost. This is without taking into account the dividends received over the years too. 

I talked to myself, I listened and I acted accordingly. Spooky!






Hock Lian Seng could possibly announce a DPS of 2.5c sometime in the near future. Based on 52.5c per share, that would give a dividend yield of 4.76%. 

Based on my cost, however, I would get dividend yields of 9.6% to 10.4%.

Wait a minute, since my remaining stake in Hock Lian Seng is free of cost, what should my dividend yield on cost be? Alamak. How to calculate like that?






I shared in a blog many years ago that my investment in First REIT was for keeps. To be fair, there are a few other investments in my portfolio which I feel the same way about.

My blog is not very cerebral in nature because I am not a very intelligent person. I am not being modest here. I am being honest.

Not being very intelligent, I hope to be rewarded by simply staying prudent, pragmatic and patient. 





I believe we don't have to be smart to be rich. If AK can do it, so can you.

Related posts:
1. First REIT: This one is for keeps.
(In five and a half years, I would have recovered my capital. )
2. Don't have to be smart to be rich.
3. Robust order book at 3 year high.

Possible delisting of Saizen REIT, First REIT and LMRT.

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

You know what they say about how things just seem to happen all at once sometimes? It never rains, it pours.

What are the chances of getting three strikes in a row? A turkey! That certainly got my bowling ball excited.


Just a few days ago, we heard news that Saizen REIT received a firm offer for their assets and this could well lead to the REIT being delisted if the offer is accepted. 

On my FB wall and here in ASSI, various discussions went on as to how much the offer could be and what could we do to fill the hole in our passive income if Saizen REIT were to be delisted.




Well, we might have more to ponder over after a friend shared this with me:

Lippo Group plans to shift two real estate investment trusts (Reits) with 35 trillion rupiah (S$3.63 billion) in assets from Singapore to Indonesia in order to benefit from tax breaks offered by Jakarta, its chief executive said.
The property-to-retail group's two Singapore-listed Reits are Lippo Malls Indonesia Retail Trust and First Real Estate Investment Trust.

Source: The Business Times

Saizen REIT and First REIT are two of my biggest investments in S-REITs. My largest investment in S-REITs is, of course, AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT. Together, these three REITs account for the majority of my passive income from S-REITs this year.

Although I sold off a large portion of my investment in LMRT (formerly LMIR) some time ago, I still have a meaningful investment in the REIT. Several percentage points might not be a big deal by themselves but add them to what I might be losing from Saizen REIT and First REIT, they become quite significant.

I could be realising significant capital gains but losing a big percentage of passive income from S-REITs in the not too distant future. It is not a tragedy, for sure, but it still creates a problem for me.

I will have to carefully consider how to make the best use of the money if the delisting of these three REITs should really happen.


Related posts:
1. Saizen REIT: Received a firm offer.

2. 9M 2015 passive income from S-REITs.

Should I sell my investment to lock in gains? A perspective.

Monday, May 25, 2015

A conversation with a reader:

Reader says...


Thank you for a great post again, this time with the Singapore Savings Bond, you always have a clear way to put it - your opinion vs general and helps people like me to make my own decision. 

I've been your blog reader for few years, and haven't written or comment at your blog for a while. 

I had bought into some Singapore Reits over the years for passive income, and this email I'd like to seek your sharing of experience in "selling" of Reits. 




I have a long term view for Reits, and keep it for income, but this particular one is putting me to a spot now - sell now or hold. First Reit. 

I bought it at around $1 and it has now appreciated to 40% and DPU is consistent for past years, they have further acquisitions and developments in Indonesia in upcoming future.  





But at this stage, at a capital appreciation of more than 40% , I'm considering if I should sell it off because I made this rough computation in my head as: 

with a 8% yearly dividend yield, if I sold off at 40% capital appreciation, it covers the next 5 years of dividend, and if crisis comes within these 5 years, I could then buy it again and accumulate again as passive income (provided all else remains equal that it is still a good company to invest in). 

But then questions put me at a stop - what if price never falls any much lower, how to calculate the $$ value of both options - hold and collect dividend vs sell off and buy back later at x $ price. 




Last week I met a several people at the AGM sharing about such problem or challenge in making decision - how to decide to hold and collect the dividend or take in the capital appreciation and put in the money somewhere else? 

A senior guy for e.g had bought in Ascendas when it was $0.60 and sold off at $1.50 and never imagined it would raise up to over $2 now. so he has no conclusion or idea why and when to hold or sell of a Reit. 

hope to hear more of sharing your experiences of strategies to sell and take in profit, and thank you in advance, for time to read this long post. :) 










AK says... 


Always question our motivations. 

Are we investing or are we trading?




If we are investing for income, if the investment is still doing the job we expect it to do, generating attractive income for us, then, there is really no reason to sell unless we feel that there is another investment out there that can do a better job.

As for wondering if the market will crash in the next 5 years, no one knows for sure. 


That is in the realms of speculation.

In the meantime, income generated from my investments fill my war chest. 





If there should be a meaningful decline in prices, all else remaining equal, I will be able to load up using my war chest.

Of course, for people who mix investing and trading, if a stock is up from $1 to $1.50, for example, they could consider selling two thirds of their investment to recover their capital. 


Their remaining position is free.

Don't mind me. I am just talking to myself.





Now the reader will start talking to herself. It is a contagious disease:





Reader says... 

Thank you AK for the response! 


I can always trust you to put it in clear steps and points. now my brain is able to do some talking to myself, after what you talk to yourself :D 

looking forward to your posts.





Related posts:
1. When to BUY, HOLD or SELL?
2. A simple way to a double digit yielding portfolio.
3. Singapore Savings Bond: Good or not?
4. Do not love unless it is worth the loving.

2014 full year income from S-REITs.

Friday, December 5, 2014

For my investments in S-REITs, the biggest thing that happened this year was the reduction in exposure to Sabana REIT.

Some might remember that I first invested in Sabana REIT in March 2011 at 92.5c a unit. As its unit price declined to under 90c, I bought more. It became one of my top two investments in S-REITs for about three years, delivering a distribution yield on cost of about 10% during that time.


I actually started reducing my investment in Sabana REIT in late 2013 and not this year as I started to build a larger position in Croesus Retail Trust then. I chose to reduce my investment in Sabana REIT instead of AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT because I felt that the latter was doing a better job of building value for unit holders as an industrial properties S-REIT.

After the major divestment of Sabana REIT early this year, my remaining exposure to the REIT is barely 10% of what it was at its peak. Now, my top three investments in S-REITs are:

1. AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT.
2. First REIT.
3. Saizen REIT.


AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT's Mr. George Wang constantly adds to his investment in the REIT, aligning his interests with those of minority shareholders'. The management have shown themselves to be capable in creating value for unit holders in their exploitation of existing properties' plot ratios. They have also improved the financial resilience of the REIT by securing other forms of funding and in strengthening its debt maturity profile.

This year, I took part in AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT's rights issue and sold the rights units for a profit some time later. Although the REIT has been doing well, it is my single largest investment in the S-REITs universe and I want to keep my exposure to a level I am more comfortable with.


In January this year, I wrote a blog titled "A simple way to a double digit yielding portfolio". It was an account of my journey as an investor with First REIT, more or less. First REIT is another example of how a REIT, if properly managed, could be a very good investment for both income and growth. It is also a REIT in which the CEO constantly puts more of his own money in.

With its DPU growing while its balance sheet stays relatively strong, my blog post titled "First REIT: This one is for keeps." in March 2010 could turn out to be quite prophetic. As long as the management continues to be prudent and as long as there is stability and a gradual pace of growing prosperity in the economies of Singapore and Indonesia, the REIT should continue to deliver good results.


Saizen REIT, my third largest investment in the S-REIT universe, has been a very rewarding investment so far. It seems to be a more complicated investment in more ways than one and as an income investor, the fact that it receives income in JPY and pays its investors in S$ is something we must consider.

The weakness in the JPY is definitely a concern. Although the downside can be hedged, it is not cheap to do so. So, realistically, I would expect some decline in future income distributions in S$ terms as the BOJ continues to expand money supply. Whether Prime Minister Abe's QQE will work or not is still a matter of contention but a weaker JPY is the new reality.

However, Saizen REIT remains a strong value proposition and the fact that a substantial shareholder has been fighting to unlock its value is proof of this. I have said time and time again that patience will be rewarded for investors of Saizen REIT's. I am sure it is beginning to sound rather tired but I will say it again. Patience will be rewarded.

For both First REIT and Saizen REIT, I have not done anything to add or reduce exposure this year. I have simply sat back, relaxed and collected income from them.


So, what did I buy this year in the S-REITs universe? I nibbled at Soilbuild Business Space Trust in August. It was a nibble because I thought it was a fair price but not undervalued. I rather like the numbers and the management seem to be competent. For those who have not read my blog post on the REIT and why I decided to buy some, please see related post no. 6.

I also have investments in the following S-REITs:

A. Keppel REIT
B. Frasers Commercial Trust
C. Lippo Malls Retail Trust
D. Cambridge Industrial Trust
E. Suntec REIT
F. Cache Logistics Trust

These are largely legacy positions or what are left after I reduced my investments in these REITs in a big way. My investment in Sabana REIT should rightly join their ranks.

With income from Sabana REIT significantly reduced this year and the fact that it was one of my largest investments in S-REITs, 2014 full year income from S-REITs has reduced drastically.


Total income received from S-REITs in 2014:
S$ 88,476.22

Although this gives me some $7,373.02 of income per month, this is a more than 25% reduction from what was received in 2013 last year. This is a significant reduction, no matter how we slice it.

Some might wonder what is AK the income investor to do? Well, I have been increasing my exposure to some other investments to make up for the shortfall in income. I might have to talk to myself in another blog post regarding these investments.

Related posts:
1. 2013 full year income from S-REITs.
2. Added Croesus Retail Trust and reduced Sabana REIT.
3. AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: 7 for 40.
4. A simple way to a double digit yielding portfolio.
5. Saizen REIT: Rewarding patient investors.
6. Soilbuild REIT: A nibble.


Monthly Popular Blog Posts

All time ASSI most popular!

 
 
Bloggy Award