Then, in reply to my comment, Henry dropped a surprise on me.
My response.
Thanks for encouraging me to continue blogging.
Have a more secure financial future in an uncertain world by creating a stream of reliable passive income with high yields.
Ever since the CPFB introduced a colorful pie chart of our CPF savings a few years ago, I would look forward to mine every year like a teena...
Posted by AK71 at 9:10 AM 29 comments
Labels:
money,
money management
A few months ago, I blogged about F.I.R.E.
More specifically, I blogged about lean F.I.R.E.
I said that some people would retire early once their passive income is able to cover their basic necessities in life, leaving very little or no room for error.
I cautioned against lean F.I.R.E. as I thought it was pretty shaky.
Of course, regular long time readers know that I like having buffers partly because I am mental but mostly because I think having a crisis mentality is not a bad thing.
I used an example of how I got pretty worried during the COVID-19 pandemic when both interest income and dividend income took a hit.
If I did not have sufficient buffers, I would probably have had to look for a job.
It would have been very difficult in a very challenging environment.
It would probably also have been very difficult because I was much older and have been out of the workforce for many years.
Why am I blogging about this now?
The catalyst for this blog was something I read this morning.
A F.I.R.E. movement pioneer who retired early 10 years ago at age 34 now says he must return to work.
Why?
He cannot afford his children's college education now.
I always say that kids are very expensive to bring up in Singapore.It is so important to think ahead when we plan for F.I.R.E. or anything in life, really.
Think what could go wrong and what happens if we should have an accident or a few along the way.
Maybe, we planned to have two children but got lucky and were blessed with triplets or quadruplets.
It sounds a bit amusing when I say this and we might laugh at it, but it could throw a spanner in the works, especially if we are on lean F.I.R.E.
After being retired for 10 years, it would probably be a challenge to return to the workforce.
Our skills or knowledge might have become obsolete or our old position might no longer exist.
Structural unemployment is very real.
Even if we are not obsolete, we would probably have to compete with younger and probably more energetic people for the same job.
They would probably be able to settle for lower salaries too.
Costs are rising and people on lean F.I.R.E. might be able to cope if they rise slowly but if they should rise rapidly like what has happened in the last one year, it could become difficult or even impossible.
I would avoid the various forms of F.I.R.E. which are along the line of lean F.I.R.E.
I don't like to live life with little or no room for error.
This is why people who follow the Y.O.L.O movement, believing that they should live life to the fullest, can ill afford mistakes.
Things do go wrong like they sometimes do.
I always demand a greater margin of safety for peace of mind.
What about you?
Related post:
F.I.R.E. lean or shaky.
![]() |
Comments section of the blog on Mr. Lee Kuan Yew. |
Posted by AK71 at 2:48 PM 22 comments
Labels:
money,
money management