AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT: Rights issue.

Unlike the share placement proposed by Cambridge Industrial Trust, a rights issue allows all unit holders to participate in an enlarged capital base and to reap the rewards, if any.  So, is this rights issue beneficial to unit holders?  Let us examine the proposal.

I won't go into the full details since anyone interested enough could find all the details in the announcement at SGX.  Read it here. For anyone who is more visually inclined, presentation slides could be viewed here.

Basically, the proposal is to acquire 27 Penjuru Lane (a 30 years leasehold property starting October 2004) for S$161.0 million.  This price is about 2% below the latest valuations.  This acquisition will be funded by debt and equity.

Debt is in the form of two term loans (a 3 year term loan of S$100m and a 5 year term loan of S$100m) and a revolving credit facility of S$80m for a period of 3 years. The manager will use S$97 million to part finance the cost of the acquisition and S$175 million to refinance an existing S$175 million facility maturing in December 2012, allaying refinancing fears.  The 7 for 20 rights issue at a price of 15.5c per unit would raise a net amount of $74.8m, of which S$64.5 million will be used to part finance the acquisition.

The acquisition will contribute to a higher NPI yield.  The current portfolio has a NPI yield of 7.4% while the property to be acquired has a NPI yield of 7.7%.  Post acquisition, the NPI yield for the REIT becomes 7.5%.  Due to the rights issue, however, the NTA per unit would decline from 31c to 26c.  However, what is of more interest to unit holders is probably the DPU and how it would be impacted.

Acquiring the property in question would bump up the total cash distribution to unit holders.  However, due to the rights issue, actual DPU would decline from 0.54c per quarter to 0.52c per quarter. So, existing unit holders will see a reduction of 3.7% in yield for their current investment in the REIT.

Having said this, unlike a share placement as proposed by CIT which dilutes the shares of existing unit holders without any benefits, the rights here are offered to unit holders at only 15.5c.  On an annualised basis, these rights shares are therefore going to enjoy a yield of 13.42%. We lose some and we win some. I support this rights issue and will apply for excess rights as well.

K-Green Trust: Possibly stabilised.

On 15 Aug, I did a TA for KGT and suggested that its chart showed some weakness. At that time, it hit a low of $1.11.  In the next two sessions, it went to a low of $1.10 as its price hugged the lower Bollinger. It has since shown a detachment from the lower Bollinger as price moved sideways. Volume has been declining in recent sessions with this sideway movement in price. This suggests that much of the selling is done. This is possibly confirmed by the OBV which has gone flat which suggests a stalemate between accumulation and distribution.

 

The RSI's lower highs indicate recent selling pressure and the index is now in oversold territory.  The MFI has similarly entered the oversold territory with falling demand. However, both indices are turning up slightly. Is a reversal on hand? It is too early to tell. However, there is a picture of growing stability as price has moved sideways for more than a week.

I decided to look at the Stochastics since it is most useful in a rangebound situation.  It has been trending up in the oversold region since 5 Aug. This looks promising. It means that the daily closing price has been relatively stronger in recent sessions compared to its price range.

On 3 July, I blogged that KGT has "Stable cash flow, low risk and room to grow.  This sounds like a good addition to my passive income portfolio. It diversifies my income stream and injects a higher level of stability at the same time. The lower yield is acceptable because of its debt free balance sheet.  When a balance sheet is heavy in debt, the risk is higher and, consequently, I would demand a higher yield."

I have been waiting for a possibly better entry price but it was impossible to use TA at that time as KGT was newly listed then. This situation is being corrected.

I believe the catalyst for an upward movement in price for KGT would be the announcement of a cash distribution and a near term support seems to have formed at $1.10 in anticipation of this. Therefore, I would buy some at the current price of $1.11 instead of waiting as per my original plan.

With an estimated yearly DPU of 7.82c, buying at $1.11 would give a yield of 7.05%.  It would also be buying at almost the NAV of $1.12. I believe that KGT would be a valuable part of my passive income portfolio.

Related post:
Charts in brief: 13 Aug 10 (Part 3).