Perennial's 3 year 4.65% bond: Good enough to buy?

A fellow blogger compared the 4.65% coupon offered with what we could get if we were to park our money in the Singapore Savings Bond (which is risk free) for 10 years.

Holding the SSB for 10 years would get us a yield of about 2.8% p.a. I have left a comment that, to be accurate, we should compare the coupon with what we could get in the SSB for 3 years.

Of course, the bonds are not strictly comparable since the SSB is really AAA rated as the borrower is the Singapore Government while PREH does not have a rating.

The question, then, is whether the coupon offered by PREH's bond compensates us for the risk we have been asked to assume as money lenders.

Perhaps, it would be better to compare this with another corporate bond. If we were to compare this offer with another corporate bond, we could compare this with the 7 years bond issued by Frasers Centrepoint Limited (FCL) earlier this year.

FCL's bond has a coupon of 3.65%. This offer by PREH is for a much shorter 3 years and has a coupon of 4.65%. If FCL were to shorten the holding period from 7 to 3 years, their coupon would probably have been much lower.

I have received several messages from readers asking if I think this bond by PREH is a good buy. Regular readers know that I won't answer such a question with a "yes" or "no".

I will say that a 4.65% coupon for a much shorter 3 years compared to FCL's 7 year bond which has a lower 3.65% coupon helps to compensate for the risk which I identified in an earlier blog post regarding PREH.

Related post:
1. FCL's 7 year 3.65% bond.
2. PREH: A nibble?
3. Singapore Savings Bond: Good or not?

The public offer will open for subscription at 9am on Tuesday and will close at 9am on Oct 21.

Frasers Centrepoint's 7 year 3.65% bonds: Who should buy?

Some readers alerted me to a bond that is being issued by Frasers Centrepoint and asked me what I thought of it. After all, investing for income, bonds are relevant instruments.

The bonds in question are 7 year bonds and have a fixed interest rate of 3.65% per annum. So, unlike the perpetual bonds issued earlier in the year by the same entity, there is a maturity date for these bonds.

Bond holders will get back their capital (as long as the entity doesn't default) at the end of the 7 year period. So, they are safer than the perpetuals which, like bond funds, I keep saying, we should avoid.

Of course, I also said that we should avoid long term bonds because as interest rates rise, bond prices will fall as Mr. Market expects higher returns for lending money. Yes, when we buy bonds, we are more lenders than investors.

There is no reason for Mr. Market to buy older bonds at their issue prices when the coupons or yields are higher for newer issues. So, prices of affected bonds will have to decline to give a comparable or more attractive yield.

Then, is a 7 year bond a long term bond? Well, conventionally, long term bonds are 20 year or 30 year bonds. However, I feel that a period of 10 years is also considerably long. What about a period of 7 years? I think it is pretty long.

In the next 7 years, is it likely for interest rates offered by the banks for money in fixed deposits to go to 3% or more per annum? When we consider how they have gone from about 1% per annum to as high as 1.6% per annum in the last one year, it is possible that they could go much higher in the next 7 years. So, we have to be prepared that the price of these bonds could decline in the next 7 years.

So, who should buy these bonds?

Those who are not only happy with a 3.65% coupon but are buying with money they are sure they do not need in the next 7 years and are prepared to hold for the full 7 years.

Read more about the bond in question: here.

Related post:
Frasers Centrepoint's Perpetual Bonds.

Tea with Solace: Frasers Centrepoint Limited (FCL)

A Peek into Frasers Centrepoint Limited (FCL)

Frasers Cpt (FCL) has been spun off by F&N, the real estate division carved off from its operation business. It was listed on the SGX Mainboard on 9 Jan 14. The stock opened at $1.61, reaching a high of about $1.70 a couple of days later before retreating to the current price of $1.41 to $1.42.

FCL operates as an international real estate company. It owns many properties that we are very familiar with. It has major stakes in two REITs – FCT and FCOT.

Souce: FCL 1Q14 Results Presentation. Click to enlarge.

Financial Highlights

Revenue increased by about 87% and PBIT increased by about 63% Year on Year. The strong set of 1Q14 results showed year on year gains in all segments. Strong overseas development sales were the key driver.

Development PBIT rose by about 121% year on year. It was led by Australia with the completion of One Central Park (CP) and Park Lane Block 5A in Sydney. As for China, around 750 units were sold in 1Q14, but the overall residential market remains cautious in China. In Singapore, Overall prices declined 0.9% q-o-q in 4Q13. Around 15,000 new homes were sold in 2013, 32% lower compared than 2012

Given the increasingly cautious sentiment in the local property market which has been affected by cooling measures, Frasers Centrepoint’s strategy of venturing overseas can put it in a good position for further growth,

There was also an increase in commercial rents and room rates with higher contribution from One@Changi City . Construction of Waterway Point is progressing well, slated to be completed in 2015.

Currently the Net Asset Value per share is $2.15. At current price of about $1.41, it is about 35% discount to its NAV. I am vested at this price

I resisted entering when it was trading at $1.50 or $1.60. Recently, I make a comparison of similar real estate companies listed in Singapore. On average, they are trading at about 0.75x book value. At current price of $1.41, with about 35% discount to NAV, I feel comfortable vested in FCL properties. Valuation is attractive in my opinion.

FCL has a net debt to equity of about 50%, which I am uncomfortable with. Recent media reports suggest that FCL will launch a hospitality trust, which could raise S$600m. Once they spin out the hospitality REIT, they should be able to move some debt off their books. This asset recycling move is beneficial to FCL similar to what OUE and SPH have done in recent times.

This move can fund new acquisitions and allow them to be asset light. This strategy also allows them to earn more REIT management fees and improve its commercial portfolio.

Potential Risks

FCL has a small free float of only about 12%. This does not sit well with large investors. Hopefully, this will change over time. Increasing FCL free float will improve investor participation and narrow the valuation discount. This remains a uncertainty and likely to depend on market forces.

Another potential risks lies in the majority shareholder. In this case, it is Thai boss, Chaoren, holding a direct stake at 76%. It is of utmost important that the Thai towkay's interests are aligned with minority shareholders.

What are the things the management can do to the detriment of minority shareholders? They can set unreasonably high directors remunerations or, worse still, IPT (Interested Person Transaction) which will solely benefit the majority shareholder instead of all shareholders. I believe IPT risk possibility is low but still it is a risk.

As Warren Buffett said, integrity of management is very important. This is an area which I have to pay attention to.

Conclusion

I believe at current valuation, FCL is attractive, trading at about 35% discount to its book value of $2.15. The portfolio is spread across residential, commercial and hospitality properties in markets such as Singapore, China and Australia which reduces the risk of downturn in any particular country dragging down the whole company. It has a good history of increasing its profits and assets. FCL also has a potential catalyst in the form of REIT listings in the near future,

Key risks like free float and management integrity still remains. The financials of FCL look extremely attractive and there is huge potential upside to go but it also holds hidden risk that goes beyond financial statements.

While many people are proclaiming doom for the real estate, my strategy is to invest at attractive valuation and sit tight to wait for events to unfold. I like to stay invested in good counters for longer period of time. All counters are good investments at the correct valuation.

I came across a recent quote from the papers which best explains my strategy in holding this stock.

"We believe that if you don’t believe in holding a share for 10 years, then don’t even think about holding it for three days… Speculators can still get their thrills through other means. But let’s not make the mistake of confusing investing with gambling"

- Mr David Kuo, Chief executive of Motley Fool Singapore.

Some other guest blogs by Solace in ASSI:
1. King Wan Corp. Ltd.
2. Common Sense Investing.
3. Getting ready for investment.