Invest in property developers? My portfolio.

Oh, no! Another short blog?

Although I like undervalued investments, there is always the possibility of such investments staying undervalued for an extended period of time.

Some readers might have noticed that this is usually the case with property developers.

My preference is, therefore, to invest in property developers that are able and have shown a willingness to reward shareholders with meaningful dividends.

The wait can be a long one and being paid while we wait makes it more affordable for most people.

Although individually my investments in property developers are definitely not big enough to be in my list of largest investments, collectively, they could be.

In late 2019, I shared the list of property developers I was invested in.

They were the following:

1. Guocoland

2. Ho Bee Land

3. Hock Lian Seng

4. OUE

5. Perennial Holdings

6. Tuan Sing

7. Wing Tai

The list has shrunk as I let go of my positions in Tuan Sing, Perennial Holdings and OUE. 

Tuan Sing was sold a few years ago when its share price rose to what I felt was fair value. 

Perennial Holdings was delisted and I made a small gain in the process a few years ago. 

OUE was a very small investment in the list and it wasn't very impactful. 

So, I let go of that investment and used the money to increase my exposure to our local banks instead.

For a while now, I have been left with the following property developers in my portfolio:

1. Guocoland

2. Ho Bee Land

3. Hock Lian Seng

4. Wing Tai

With interest rates much higher today, property developers are unlikely to do much better than before.

However, these four companies are undervalued and they should still be able do well enough to pay meaningful dividends.

I like being paid while I wait.

For example, Wing Tai Holdings which is trading at close to 70% discount to NAV is offering a 4% dividend yield.

It is like Warren Buffett buying socks at a huge discount but it doesn't stop there because the socks, in this case, pay us for wearing them!

Having said this, I am not increasing exposure to property developers although I am more than comfortable to hold on to my existing investments.

Related posts:
1. Perennial Holdings stock spikes!
2. Invested in Tuan Sing Holdings.
3. Hock Lian Seng should be 69c.
Recently published:
Fixed income strategy. My plan.

Perennial Real Estate Holdings' stock price spikes.

Regular readers know I have smallish investments in a few property developers and in a blog in late 2019, I said:

"Based on market value, together, they probably account for a sizable chunk of my investment portfolio."

Yesterday, I saw PREH's stock price spiked up and looked for an explanation.

I got this:

"Perennial Real Estate Holdings Limited (the "Company") notes the increase in the price of the shares of the Company on Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited in the course of trading today.

"The board of the Company (the “Board”) has been notified that certain of its substantial shareholders are reviewing the options in relation to their holdings in the Company.

"The Company understands that a decision has yet to be made by such substantial shareholders and there is no assurance that a transaction will take place.

"Accordingly, shareholders are advised to refrain from taking any action in respect of theirshares in the Company which may be prejudicial to their interests, and to exercise caution when dealing in the shares of the Company. The Company will update shareholders in due course when it becomes aware of any material developments."

Source:
PREH Voluntary Announcement.





I have added to my smallish investment in PREH in the past, averaging down my cost.

Still, this investment is suffering a paper loss.

With the spike in the stock price, the paper loss has significantly reduced.

I do not intend to add to my investments in property developers as I explained late last year.

"For a retiree like me, I feel that is enough exposure to property developers.

"For sure, I do not know when value would be unlocked and this unknown makes limiting the total investment exposure to 10% of my portfolio or lower sensible."

I also said:

"... the ability to generate a meaningful recurring income stream has always been an important consideration for me.

"It has become more so as I grow more settled into my early retirement."






If there is going to be an offer to take PREH private, I hope it is a fairly good price as PREH is trading at a huge discount to NAV.

To be realistic, I could still end up losing some money here.

Who wants to pay a higher price if they can pay a lower price?

Even though PREH is undervalued, if we are buying on the hope that value will be unlocked, it is more speculation than investment.

In speculation, being lucky is probably more important than being clever.






Related post:
AK's exposure to property developers.

Quek Leng Chan ups stake in Guocoland. Is AK buying? (How much exposure to property developers does AK have?)

Someone asked me if I would be increasing my investment in Guocoland recently as it is still trading at a big discount to NAV.

In fact, he also asked if I would be increasing my exposure to the property sector since interest rates look like they will stay low for some years to come.

Although I like undervalued investments, there is always the possibility of such investments staying undervalued for an extended period of time.

Some readers might have noticed that this is usually the case with property developers.






My preference is, therefore, to invest in property developers that are able and have shown a willingness to reward shareholders with meaningful dividends.

The wait can be a long one and being paid while we wait makes it more affordable for most people.

Guocoland is a pretty good fit.

Since becoming a shareholder of Guocoland, I have received three rounds of 7c DPS.

Dividend yield is about 3.8%.

That is pretty decent for a property developer.








I became a shareholder of Guocoland in 2017.

That was when I noticed persistent insider buying and decided to do an incomplete analysis.

Then, I decided to invest in Guocoland which was trading at a hefty discount to valuation. 

Well, there is more insider buying now.

Following recent purchases, Mr. Quek Leng Chan's stake in Guocoland increased to almost 72%.

Although paying a price of $2.05 a share is more than 10% higher compared to what we paid back in 2017, the price is still a big discount to the NAV of $3.47 a share.






I am quite happy to hold on to my investment in Guocoland but I won't be adding now.

Reason?

Although individually my investments in property developers are not big enough to be in my list of largest investments, collectively, they are.

So, which property developers am I invested in?

They are:

1. Guocoland
2. Ho Bee Land
3. Hock Lian Seng
4. OUE
5. Perennial Holdings
6. Tuan Sing
7. Wing Tai

(If you want to read my past blogs about these entities, click on their names above as they are hyperlinked.)






Based on market value, together, they probably account for a sizable chunk of my investment portfolio.

For a retiree like me, I feel that is enough exposure to property developers.

For sure, I do not know when value would be unlocked and this unknown makes limiting the total investment exposure to 10% of my portfolio or lower sensible.

What if value is not unlocked in my lifetime?

Hmmm...






Although I am not interested in increasing my exposure to property developers, I have increased my investment in the property sector by putting more money into the following business entities not too long ago:

1. IREIT
2. Centurion
3. Accordia Golf Trust

(If you want to read my past blogs about these entities, click on their names above as they are hyperlinked.)






It should be obvious that the ability to generate a meaningful recurring income stream has always been an important consideration for me.

It has become more so as I grow more settled into my early retirement.

Of course, I am only doing what makes sense to me.

Others have to do what makes sense to them.

Oh, totally unrelated, I watched the following video by CPFB and had a good laugh:





Related post:
Largest investments updated (4Q 2019).

Invested in Tuan Sing Holdings.

When a reader asked me what I thought about Tuan Sing Holdings as it trades at almost 60% discount to NAV, it got me interested enough to take a closer look because this is something I think I understand.

I approached this in a way that is similar to my approach to investing in Guocoland. 

Substantial shareholders, the Liem family, and also Koh Wee Meng of Fragrance Group together hold a 60% stake in Tuan Sing. 







It is interesting to note that Mr. Koh's purchase price in 2014 was 43c a share and Tuan Sing's NAV per share then was 68c.

Based on its Annual Report for 2016, Tuan Sing's NAV per share grew to 77c and its stock is now trading at a lower price than in 2014. 


On the face of it, therefore, Tuan Sing is worth more today and with a lower share price, it is more undervalued than before.





Why is this so?

Tuan Sing's earnings have been in decline and Mr. Market probably doesn't like that. 

To top it off, Tuan Sing's gearing level is pretty high and interest cover ratio has also weakened from 14x in 2012 to just 2.2x in 2016.

At the current price level, there seems to be plenty of value waiting to be unlocked but it also seems to be thornier an investment.

We must remember that undervalued could stay undervalued for some time. So, it would be good to be paid while we wait. 




Do they pay dividends?

Tuan Sing pays a dividend but it is nothing to shout about. How much? 0.5 cent to 0.6 cent a share. 

Assuming a purchase price of 33c a share, we are looking at a dividend yield of 1.5% to 1.8%. 

Anyone who buys into Tuan Sing for income has to be mental. 





1.5% to 1.8% is lower than the 2.7% dividend yield from Guocoland based on an entry price of $1.83 a share and that was not an ideal investment for income either.

We know that property developers usually have pretty lumpy earnings but I am most interested in the fact that Tuan Sing has a relatively big portfolio of investment properties in Singapore, China and Australia.

Therefore, like Guocoland, Tuan Sing has the potential to become a more attractive investment for income investors if future payouts should increase together with any increase in future cash flow. 




Of course, this is somewhat speculative as it is anyone's guess what the Liems have in mind.

Source: Tuan Sing Holdings Limited.

To continue along this line, Tuan Sing's portfolio of development properties is pretty small at less than 10% of its total portfolio value. This reminds me of OUE Limited which I also have a relatively small investment in.

A big reason probably why Tuan Sing's gearing level is so high, their earnings is much reduced and, consequently, their interest cover ratio is so poor is because quite a big portion of its investment properties are still under development. They have yet to generate any income.




It stands to reason that once Tuan Sing's investment properties are fully completed, once they start generating income, earnings will improve and, significantly, it is worth noting that this will be recurring income which is something investors for income look for.

Of course, Tuan Sing still have development properties to sell but since that business is a relatively small portion of their entire portfolio, if they should sell well, it is the icing on the cake. If they don't sell well, it is not going to be a disaster either. 

Cake without any icing, anyone?




Tuan Sing is another asset play and if the valuation is to be believed, they are a pretty heavily undervalued asset play too. 

Just like my investments in OUE Limited, Wing Tai, PREH and Guocoland, my investment in Tuan Sing is only a nibble because it could be a long wait before value is unlocked.




In the news this year:
Sime Darby Centre purchased
and
Tuan Sing's earnings tumble 64%.
Related posts:
1. Guocoland analysis.
2. PREH analysis.
3. OUE Limited analysis.
4. Wing Tai Holdings analysis.

2016 full year passive income from non-REITs (Part 1).

During an "Evening with AK and friends", someone asked if I was going to sell my stocks as market guru Hu Li Yang was expecting a stock market crash. I said we should stay invested as the market was still awashed in liquidity and money will go to where it is treated best. See: Evening with AK and friends.



So, what did I do in 2H 2016 in the non-REITs space? I made various purchases but, mostly, I was buying DBS shares. Besides DBS, I also bought some shares of OUE Limited, PREH, Wilmar, OCBC, Breadtalk and Starhub.

(I am impressed by DBS' cost management. Their cost to income ratio keeps declining.)

The narrative for investing in OCBC was similar to the one for DBS. Although all three local banks' stocks looked cheap to me, my preference was for DBS because of the perceived cheaper valuation.


The reason for me putting some money in OCBC's stock was mostly because my long position in DBS grew so big (and I do mean BIG) that it was prudent for me to step on the brakes. 




Using a strategy I employ frequently for stocks which I am highly confident in, my relatively large position in DBS included both a core position for income as well as a trading position.

Why not UOB? 


Well, I think UOB has been a bit laid back. I am not saying that it is a bad thing, mind you, but its growth story seems less exciting.

Of course, some might say that DBS and OCBC have been more "adventurous" but I like to think that they are more enterprising.

I feel that growing their wealth management business more aggressively will continue to set them apart from UOB as that business contributes more and more to their earnings.

Next, Wilmar. I continue to like Wilmar's business strategy and their very impressive scale of operations. It is an amazingly complex business and, to be quite honest, I have no way to analyse most of its operations.

However, when Mr. Kuok thinks their shares are cheap and bought more at $3.00 a share, that was a pretty clear signal to me. At that price, we would also be buying at around its NAV which seems conservative.

Source: RHB.

Having accumulated a rather significant long position in Wilmar in recent years, I am quite happy to wait while being paid to do so.

Now, for OUE Limited. I blogged about my rationale for increasing exposure to OUE Limited when I shared my numbers for 1H 2016 (see related post #1). Back then, I added at $1.51 a share. In 2H 2016, I added more at $1.53 a share.

Twin Peaks.

My decision to increase exposure was mostly driven by the even larger discount to NAV from the time I initiated a long position. 

There is much value in OUE Limited but waiting for value to be unlocked requires a lot of patience. Well, remember, a wise man did say before that the big money is in the waiting.

Along similar line of reasoning, I also added to my investment in PREH at 80c a share a few days ago. This is the lowest price I have ever paid for PREH. The last time I bought any PREH shares was more than a year ago. 

It is interesting to me that Mr. Ron Sim, Mr. Pua S.G. and Mr. Kuok K.H. have been increasing their stakes in PREH on price weakness. 

PREH is an asset play but it is also a growth story. It is not for the faint hearted.

PREH

As for Breadtalk, I have a more recent blog post on my decision to initiate a position. I compared it to Old Chang Kee and QAF Limited, both of which I have been a shareholder of for many years. 

If you are interested to know why I had a change of heart and decided to initiate a smallish long position in Breadtalk, go to the related posts at the end of this blog post (see related post #2).

Starhub. In June last year, when I did a technical analysis for Starhub, I said:

"The widening of the Bollinger Bands indicates increased volatility. The OBV shows selling pressure. The MACD is declining and shows no sign of a positive divergence. These are all on the weekly chart which suggests that continuing weakness in the longer term should not surprise us." Read blog post: here.


We saw Starhub's stock price sinking and I nibbled  again in late November. I feel that Mr. Market is right to be concerned but might be overly pessimistic about Starhub's prospects with the introduction of a 4th telco.

There is plenty of speculation now but, to be realistic, it will take time for the new entrant (which is expected to enter the market in 2018) to gain traction and it remains to be seen how successful it will be.




Back in June 2015, I also said that SPH and Starhub were similar:

"They could see earnings come under pressure for different reasons but that makes them similar too as the challenges are very real.... I would like to have some buffer in terms of dividend yield buying into SPH and Starhub because I am investing in them primarily for income and not growth." Read blog post: here.

I believe I am getting a much thicker cushion buying Starhub at under $2.80 a share and that was what I did.

As for SPH, let me share here a recent conversation with a reader:

I have been a SPH shareholder for many years and I am happy enough to be paid while I wait.
---------------------
As this turned out to be a very long blog post, I chopped it up into two parts. Read Part 2: HERE.
Related posts:

1. 1H 2016 income from non-REITs.

2. Breadtalk, OCK and QAF.

3. Made $1m investing for income.
4. 2016 FY income from S-REITs.

PREH is likely to continue trading at a big discount.

My experience with Perennial Real Estate Holdings (PREH) started from its days as Perennial China Retail Trust (PCRT).

PREH has a portfolio consisting mostly properties in China in terms of asset value (75%) and the balance being properties in Singapore.

Some numbers:

NAV/share= $1.68
Gearing= 0.45x
EPS=6.88c






At 90c a share, we are looking at a PE ratio of about 13x.

I believe that PREH is a long term value creator. 

The investment thesis is somewhat similar to that for CapitaMalls Asia which I had an investment in before. Similarly, PREH's Chinese investments will take time to deliver the goods. 





PREH is definitely not for the impatient investor. 

Although not comparable in many ways, for something similar in terms of gearing and EPS, the purist income investor might be more interested in Croesus Retail Trust (which holds Japanese commercial properties) and regular readers know that I have a significant investment in Croesus Retail Trust.

...

At the moment, I have a smallish exposure to PREH and I am likely to add to my position if its stock price should decline further.

I like PREH's longer term growth story and I am quite willing to wait for it to do better.

I bought into my investments in both OUE and Wing Tai Holdings at a 50% discount to NAV or more. 

So, I will probably add to my investment in PREH using the same yardstick.






Related posts:
1. Perennial Real Estate Holdings.
2. Perennial China Retail Trust.
3. Croesus Retail Trust.
4. CapitaMalls Asia.

Perennial's 3 year 4.65% bond: Good enough to buy?

A fellow blogger compared the 4.65% coupon offered with what we could get if we were to park our money in the Singapore Savings Bond (which is risk free) for 10 years.

Holding the SSB for 10 years would get us a yield of about 2.8% p.a. I have left a comment that, to be accurate, we should compare the coupon with what we could get in the SSB for 3 years.

Of course, the bonds are not strictly comparable since the SSB is really AAA rated as the borrower is the Singapore Government while PREH does not have a rating.

The question, then, is whether the coupon offered by PREH's bond compensates us for the risk we have been asked to assume as money lenders.

Perhaps, it would be better to compare this with another corporate bond. If we were to compare this offer with another corporate bond, we could compare this with the 7 years bond issued by Frasers Centrepoint Limited (FCL) earlier this year.

FCL's bond has a coupon of 3.65%. This offer by PREH is for a much shorter 3 years and has a coupon of 4.65%. If FCL were to shorten the holding period from 7 to 3 years, their coupon would probably have been much lower.

I have received several messages from readers asking if I think this bond by PREH is a good buy. Regular readers know that I won't answer such a question with a "yes" or "no".

I will say that a 4.65% coupon for a much shorter 3 years compared to FCL's 7 year bond which has a lower 3.65% coupon helps to compensate for the risk which I identified in an earlier blog post regarding PREH.

Related post:
1. FCL's 7 year 3.65% bond.
2. PREH: A nibble?
3. Singapore Savings Bond: Good or not?

The public offer will open for subscription at 9am on Tuesday and will close at 9am on Oct 21.

Perennial Real Estate Holdings (PREH): A nibble?

Regular readers would remember how I once bought units in Perennial China Retail Trust (PCRT), how I sold a part of my investment when its unit price moved up and how I sold my entire investment a couple of years later in 2014.

What motivated me to invest in PCRT in 2012 was the much lower unit price it was trading at the time compared to its price at IPO and while it made progress in its business, its income distributions were largely unchanged. However, when it was clear to me that the income distributions were not going to be sustainable, I made my exit.

Of course, we know that PCRT was eventually delisted and its assets are now part of a larger entity, Perennial Real Estate Holdings (PREH). Backing PREH are big names in the corporate world, Mr. Kuok Khoon Hong, Mr. Ron Sim and Mr. Pua Seck Guan. Together, they hold a combined interest of about 70% in PREH. Some of us might have noticed some persistent insider buying in PREH and that was the reason why a friend recently told me that I should go take a look.

Well, I vaguely remember that PREH owns some Singapore assets as well. So, it is a more complicated creature compared to PCRT. It could be a daunting task to analyse and also because so many of its assets in China are still being developed. Anyway, I decided to start by looking at its financial results dated 13 Feb 2015 and see if I could cut short the process by looking at the numbers which could matter more. See financial results: here.

From 28 Oct 2014 to 31 Dec 2014, revenue was reported as $14.966 million. Just to make it easier for me, I will think of this as 2 months' worth of revenue. Assuming nothing changes, revenue would be $89.796 million for the full year. Now, I try to derive the earnings.

Administrative expenses ballooned due to the offer to buy over PCRT. Removing that non-recurring portion, we could see expenses at $40 million for the full year. Finance costs could be about $60 million for the full year.

Associates' contributions (disregarding fair value gains) would amount to about $8 million for the whole year, all else remaining equal. Similarly, I have ignored fair value gains on PREH's fully owned investment properties to the tune of some $46 million.

Now, if we put all these together, we will get:

Revenue $89.796 million
+ Associates' contributions $8 million
- Expenses $100 million
= A small full year loss of about $2 million

Whether PREH is able to become profitable would depend on their ability to increase asking rents for their investment properties in Singapore and China. It would also depend on whether they are able to sell some percentage of their investment properties to realise capital gains which was suggested by Mr. Pua Seck Guan when he was still running PCRT then in order to fund income distributions to unit holders. That would really have been a partial return of capital but it would also have been a useful exercise to see if the valuation of PCRT's assets was actually realistic.

Since the release of its financial results dated 13 Feb 2015, PREH also acquired stakes in House of Tan Yeok Nee and smallish stakes in Chinatown Point and 112 Katong. It also recently announced the purchase of AXA Tower in Singapore. We could see revenue receiving a boost as these are investment properties that would be generating rental revenue.

Of course, we won't be wrong to suspect that there will also be more debt on its balance sheet and that finance expense should increase. How much of an impact would these have? At the moment, I simply don't know.

What is known is that PREH inherited PCRT's Chinese portfolio and the challenges have not changed. There are still many development projects which are yet to be completed and these have to be paid for.

The funds required for the various projects are estimated to be about S$1.5 billion. That is a lot of money. If we look at the liabilities section of the balance sheet, PREH is already heavily geared. Having said this, they are well located projects situated on transportation nodes.

There are many assumptions for PREH to do better. Mr. Pua Seck Guan has a very good track record in his career and now he has the backing of Mr. Kuok and Mr. Sim. Having strong backers definitely helps especially when circumstances for real estate either in Singapore or China are somewhat challenging now. Could PREH have bitten off more than they could chew?

There are some calls to buy into PREH now because it is trading at a big discount to RNAV. Well, PCRT was also trading at a big discount to RNAV. A big difference is that PREH now owns, in part, some investment properties in Singapore which are generating recurring income but these are also bought with borrowed funds.

There is an estimate that the RNAV per share is $1.83. So, at $1.05, the stock is trading at a 43% discount to RNAV. RNAV is what an analyst thinks the stock should be worth in future based on revaluation exercises. Is it realistic? I read a 19 page report dated 4 February 2015 by PhilipCapital and I feel that they have been pretty realistic with valuing PREH's assets in Singapore.

As for the assets in China, PhilipCapital made assumptions as to percentages of certain development properties which would be sold by PREH and they seem to have opted for more conservative estimates with regards to asset values too. Read PhilipCapital's analysis: here.

Now, assuming that the RNAV of $1.83 per share is realistic, we would then have to ask ourselves if a 43% discount to RNAV is good enough for us to buy into PREH. If we are buying this in the hope that Mr. Market would pay a price closer to its RNAV in future, are we prepared to wait? For how long must we wait? I don't know. Will there be dividends in future as we wait? There could be, especially, if they sell bits (or chunks) of their investment properties although they could also very well opt to pare down borrowings. There is no certainty of a dividend.

I have bought into OUE Limited at slightly more than 50% discount to valuation. I have bought into Wing Tai Holdings at about 56% discount to valuation. Will I now buy some PREH at a 43% discount to valuation? I have a feeling that if not for the persistent insider buying, PREH's stock price would have declined to a much lower level by now. Will insider buying let up? Again, I don't know.

PREH is definitely not an investment for income and I don't think that they are likely to pay a dividend anytime soon. PREH is still very much in its growth phase, just like how PCRT was in its growth phase. PREH might have stronger backing compared to PCRT but there are still many unknowns.

Of course, we could choose to put our faith in Mr. Pua Seck Guan's judgement like Mr. Kuok and Mr. Sim have done and invest in PREH. Why get headaches from trying to analyse the business? Truly, I got a mild headache after my amateurish attempt which lasted several hours.

In conclusion, I probably don't have the kind of vision that these esteemed gentlemen have and I know for a fact that I do not have the deep pockets that they have. If I should invest in PREH, I would make sure it is a smallish position similar in size to my investments in OUE Limited and Wing Tai Holdings.

A nibble? Maybe.

Related post:
PCRT: Full divestment.