3Q 2018 passive income (S-REITs).

In 2Q 2018, there was a bit of action in the S-REITs space for me and one of the things I did was to add to my investment in Starhill Global REIT at 64c a piece.

In 3Q 2018, I was ready to add to my investment in Starhill Global REIT if Mr. Market's pessimism should worsen.

However, Mr. Market felt better about the REIT's prospects and the unit price rebounded.






To understand why I bought more of Starhill Global REIT when I did and how it became one of my larger smaller investments, go to the related post at the end of this blog.

The top 3 income contributors from my investments in S-REITs in 3Q 2018 were:

1. AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT

2. First REIT

3. IREIT Global

I often get asked whether we should continue investing in S-REITs since interest rates are on the rise.

I am aware that this is really another way of asking what is going to happen to the unit prices of S-REITs in future.

I don't know how the prices will move in future.

I only know that investing in bona fide income producing assets has been rewarding and it should continue to be rewarding.






If we believe that real estate has intrinsic value, then, buying at a discount to valuation, we should have some margin of safety.

Also, we have to ask whether the management is honest and capable enough to unlock value for shareholders too.

Of course, S-REITs are not perfect nor are they the only tool available to investors for income.

We also want to be careful not to be overly reliant on S-REITs as the higher yield comes at a price.

Remember, S-REITs pay out 100% of their cash flow most of the time and have no retained earnings.

So, investing in S-REITs, we have to be prepared for the possibility of rights issues.

Those who are fully invested and dependent on S-REITs for income should beware.





This is especially if the dependence on S-REITs for passive income is absolute and critical.

"Absolute" means that these investors have no other sources of passive income.

"Critical" means that any reduction in passive income from S-REITs would be a life altering event for these investors.





Remember, how we invest and what we invest in should depend on our personal circumstances and what we hope to achieve.

It is never my way or the highway.

You should have a plan, your own plan.

However, to have a plan that works for you, you must know what you want and what you are capable of and willing to do.




For example, in middle of September this year, a reader asked me about investing in Soilbuild REIT again.

blazingruby60 said...
I remembered you mentioned that all investment is good investment at the right price.

looking at soilbuild i have sold after reading this article here and wondering would you consider buying soilbuild again at 58 cents?

considering soilbuild has ventured overseas to australia to acquire some properties and all.

thanks n cheers.






AK said... 
I was thinking about it but I decided not to invest in Soilbuild REIT now because

1. I already have a pretty large exposure to industrial property S-REITs which also have exposure to the Australian economy (AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT and Fraser Logistics Trust).

2. I would like to have a much bigger percentage of my portfolio in non-REITs to reduce reliance on S-REITs for income.

Of course, things could change in future. :)

Investing in S-REITs for income, we have to take in a bigger picture and, to be realistic, your picture could be quite different from mine.

My total 3Q 2018 passive income from S-REITs was:

S$ 19,884.80

AA REIT 10-year Anniversary 
- Celebrating 10 years of Partnership!

On a per month basis, it works out to be about S$6,628.00 a month.

Related post:
2Q 2018 passive income from S-REITs.

2Q 2018 passive income from S-REITs.

Regular readers know that AK is usually pretty inactive as an investor, preferring to do nothing most of the time and just collect dividends.

Well, in 2Q 2018, in the S-REITs space, there was a bit of action.






There was the 1 for 10 rights issue by Frasers Logistics & Industrial Trust (FLT) in which I took up my entitlement and applied for a small number of excess rights.

To be honest, I did not think that the rights issue was very attractively priced. 

Perhaps, it was fairly priced.

We have to take note that the massive deal weakened the REIT's balance sheet significantly while delivering very little increase to DPU and NAV per unit.






I must say that I feel that the deal was better for the sponsor than it was for the REIT.

We shall see if the REIT's DPU grows in future, everything else remaining equal.

Having said this, the REIT should still be a fairly safe and stable investment for income that keeps me happy enough to stay invested.

Even after the rights issue, the REIT is still only one of my bigger smaller investments (under $100,000 in market value but more than $50,000).

Another thing I did in 2Q 2018 was to nibble at Starhill Global REIT as its unit price declined.

As its unit price declined by 5%, I pointed out to a friend that the drop in unit price did not really make the REIT absolutely more of a bargain than it was before.

Of course, I was not interested in adding to my investment then.

If you remember, I mentioned in an earlier blog that with the new tax levied by Malaysia, I estimated a 5% reduction to the REIT's DPU.

So, with a lower DPU, it is only logical that the REIT's unit price took a 5% hit as well.






However, when its unit price declined by much more than 5% later on, I decided that the selling was probably overdone.

In fact, unit price has declined by more than 10% compared to my initial entry price and I couldn't resist nibbling.

After all, there is reason to be hopeful that Starhill Global REIT could do better in future and that buying at a big discount to its NAV is a very tempting proposition and probably provides a decent margin of safety.







The REIT's portfolio of commercial buildings has intrinsic value.

As an investment for income right now, however, it is really nothing to shout about.

Although I feel that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the REIT, it is really one for investors who are very patient and who are OK with being paid while waiting.

As I bought more in 2Q 2018, Starhill Global REIT has just crossed the line to become one of my larger smaller investments like Frasers Logistics & Industrial Trust (under $100,000 in market value but more than $50,000) but it is on the smaller side compared to FLT.









I like to think that all investments are good at the right price.

At such a big discount to NAV, it is just too hard for me to ignore but without a clearly stronger income investing angle here, I reminded myself not to take too big a bite.

I don't like choking.






Regular readers should not be surprised that the two largest contributors to my passive income from S-REITs are:

1. AA REIT
2. FIRST REIT






DBS recently did a piece on AA REIT, suggesting that it could be a target for takeover and suggested a target price of $1.55 to $1.65 per unit.

• Resilient industrial gem that offers above-average yield of 7.4%-7.6% over FY19-FY21

• Extraction of value from greenfield projects and addition of c.600,000 sqft of untapped GFA could drive revenues by c.16%

• Potential takeover target amid global hunt for quality assets







Frankly, I am not too enthusiastic about this, having lost quite a few good income generating investments in similar fashion already (with Saizen REIT and Croesus Retail Trust being the largest).

Quite honestly, unless there is another bear market, it is not easy to find robust replacements as more meaningful investments for income.





OK, enough grumbling.

Total passive income from S-REITs in 2Q 2018:

S$ 18,715.33

The next blog will be on my passive income from non-REITs and we will have the full picture for 2Q 2018 then.

Related post:
1Q 2018 passive income from S-REITs.

FY2017 passive income from S-REITs.

Time flies and 2017 is coming to an end.

Time for me to take a look at how much income my portfolio of S-REIT has generated for me in the final quarter of the year.







The plan for Saizen REIT to transform into a REIT holding Australian industrial properties failed to materialise.

In the end, it was delisted from the stock exchange and whatever residual value was distributed to its shareholders.

This lifted my total income from S-REITs for the year rather nicely.

Of course, this is definitely the final distribution from Saizen REIT and it will not be repeated.

4Q 2017 distributions from S-REITs:

S$ 31,812.93









Did I change anything in my S-REITs portfolio in 4Q 2017?

I decided to use some of the income received in 4Q 2017 to increase my investment in Starhill Global REIT by more than 50%, paying 74.5c a unit.

This price is, of course, slightly higher than my initial purchase but I believe that even at 74.5c a unit, the REIT is still relatively undervalued.








Now, read this chat I had earlier this month:

In my blog published in March 2017 (see related post #1 at the end of this blog), I said that I was knocking off 5% from the REIT's DPU to be conservative but I did not expect it to take a knock in this manner.

So, everything else being equal, DPU could eventually be 4.75c.

This would give me a distribution yield of 6.37%.

If we would like to remain conservative and knock another 5% off its DPU, it would give us a DPU of 4.5c or a distribution yield of slightly more than 6%.

Being a slightly less compelling offer now, I merely nibbled.

Other than this minor addition, my portfolio of S-REITs is unchanged from the previous quarter.







In case you are too lazy to check my past blogs to calculate FY 2017 distributions received by my portfolio of S-REITs:

S$ 95,142.98

That works out to be approximately S$7,928.00 a month in passive income.

Without a leg up from Saizen REIT's final contribution, I expect my passive income from S-REITs to be some 10% lower in 2018, everything else being equal.

My next few blogs will be about my FY 2017 income from non-REITs and what I did in that space.



Read a message from AK as ASSI turns 8: HERE.

FY2017 passive income from non-REITs (Part 1): HERE.







Related posts:
1. Starhill Global REIT analysis.
2. Saizen REIT's bumper distribution.

Online shopping, retail S-REITs and Starhill Global REIT.

Online shopping is gaining strength rapidly and even an IT dinosaur like AK buys stuff online. From my own experience, I would say that online shopping is attractive because of two factors:

1. Convenience. Delivered to my home with either very competitively priced delivery fee or free delivery.

2. Cheaper. For the same item, I have saved as much as 30% buying online than buying in a brick and mortar shop.




So, if a shop in a mall is selling stuff that could be found online, unless the mall is conveniently located and unless they are priced competitively, that shop is going the way of the Dodo. 

It is just a matter of time.

Shopping malls must fill themselves more with shops that offer goods and services which cannot be found online for one reason or another. 

After all, there are things which online shops cannot do or cannot do well.

Therefore, despite the growing reach of online vendors, I believe that some shopping malls will continue to do reasonably well and some readers might remember that I have been waiting to invest in CapitaMall Trust (CMT). 

However, I have not been able to get in at a price which I am comfortable with because Mr. Market likes pedigree and, just like Frasers Centrepoint Trust (FCT), even now, CMT is trading at around its Net Asset Value (NAV) and both are offering very similar distribution yields in the mid 5%.




REITs, unlike companies, pay out most of their cash flow from operations to their investors. 

They do not pay dividends from their earnings. 

They distribute income. 

They do not have retained earnings. 

One way REITs grow, without placing too much demand on shareholders (think rights issue) or diluting minority shareholders (think private placements) is to ensure that there is genuine growth in the value of their assets which would in turn give them more leeway to fund more growth through using debt. 

It is a virtuous cycle, one that hinges on the growing value of assets. I think we can agree that CMT and FCT have done rather well in this area.




However, given the uncertain retail environment for some time now, although well run, I would like to invest in CMT and FCT at a meaningful discount to NAV and if they offered higher distribution yields.

Asset values in good times would appreciate but in bad times they could come under pressure. 

So, buying at a discount to NAV makes sense to me unless we feel that asset values can only go up and never go down.

Although I have been mostly looking at CMT, I have also looked at FCT and Starhill Global REIT (SGR).




I like CMT and FCT. I am more familiar with their malls. However, I am not comfortable with getting in at current prices. 

I am not as familiar with SGR's malls (i.e. Wisma Atria and Ngee Ann City) and not all their malls are in Singapore which, by the way, is a good thing. 

However, trading at a meaningful discount to NAV and offering a distribution yield closer to 7%, to me, SGR is priced more attractively.

There are a few more factors which pushed me towards investing in SGR:

1. More than a third of SGR is owned by the sponsor, YTL Group. 

This helps to ensure a greater degree of alignment of interest with minority unit holders.

2. The management is looking to sell the REIT's Chinese and Japanese assets to concentrate on what they consider the REIT's core markets of Singapore, Australia and Malaysia. 

Now, reducing concentration risk is good but having a handful of assets in China and Japan probably isn't beneficial and would, in fact, add disproportionately to operating costs.

3. The relative weakness in SGR's performance is probably going to be temporary because of redevelopment works in an asset in Australia and a delay in a new tenant moving into its asset in China.




Looking at SGR's DPU for the last quarter, annual DPU, all else remaining equal is about 5c which gives us a 6.85% distribution yield based on 73c per unit. 

However, if there were to be more hiccups, income could be affected negatively and I am knocking off 5% from DPU to 4.75c to take this into consideration. 6.5% distribution yield is good enough for me while I wait for an improvement in performance.

I am not buying into SGR because I think its outlook is fantastic. For sure, they will face challenges.

I am buying into SGR because, taking advantage of its recent price weakness, I feel that there is some margin of safety.




SGR is an investment that is likely to generate a fairly good yield for the price that I paid.

Related posts:
1. CRCT added to my portfolio.
2. CMT and when am I nibbing?