Quite a few recent comments were about REITs.
So, a blog on why I invest in REITs is probably a good idea.
After all, REITs are all leveraged to some degree and higher interest rates will surely burden REITs.
However, compared to us directly investing in a property, REITs are probably more conservative when it comes to borrowing money with allowed gearing capped at 50%.
We are allowed a higher gearing level in the purchase of a property, in comparison, with 70% or 80% LTV being the norm.
Of course, property valuation has to be trustworthy but that is another topic.
If you are interested, maybe, read this blog:
So, if we are worried about rising interest rates and REITs doing poorly, we should also be worried about investing in real estate in general.
I very much prefer investing in REITs because:
1. I do not want to take on more debt.
2. I do not want concentration risk.
3. I do not want to deal with tenants.
Regular readers know I do not borrow money to invest in stocks.
I know some will argue that some debt is not a bad thing and I agree because a judicious amount of debt can make good decisions deliver better results.
Of course, the opposite is also true as debt will magnify the damage resulting from bad decisions.
There is no telling when a seemingly good decision could turn bad and I do not want to take the chance especially in retirement.
In fact, investing in REITs already exposes us to debt since REITs are leveraged.
I just don't want to take on more debt on a personal level and like I said, REITs are relatively conservative when it comes to leverage which helps to give me peace of mind.
See:
Unless we are very rich, it is unlikely that we can buy more than one or, maybe, two properties on our own steam.
This creates concentration risk and if we should end up buying a property which is hard to rent out or resell, we could be in trouble.
The truth is that most of us are not experts when it comes to real estate investment and we usually rely on "experts."
Concentration risk also includes counter party risk.
So, even if we should rent out our property, if the tenant stops paying rent for some reason, rental income goes to zero.
When we invest in REITs, we invest in a bigger number of buildings and we are collecting rent from a larger number of tenants.
and
REITs are professionally managed.
I don't have to look for tenants.
I don't have to deal with their demands or complaints.
I don't have to deal with the upkeep of the properties.
The only thing I have to do is to check my bank account once every quarter to make sure these REITs pay me a share of the rental income.
I should also mention that it is rarely possible to buy properties at a discount to their valuation.
Properties are rarely mispriced like some were in the USA during the early days of the Global Financial Crisis.
However, it is often possible to buy REITs at a discount to their NAV and a relatively big discount at times.
If we look at my largest investments in REITs today, most of my investment in AIMS APAC REIT was made when it was trading at a discount to NAV more than 10 years ago.
My investment in AIMS APAC REIT has been free of cost for some time and it is still generating income for me.
IREIT Global is a more recent investment in comparison and I increased my investment in the REIT substantially at a discount to its NAV and it is still trading at a discount to NAV today.
Sabana REIT grew from a small legacy position to a more substantial position after the low ball offer by ESR REIT was rejected and the purchases which resulted in the relatively substantial position I have now were made at a big discount to NAV.
I could go back a few years and it was the same with Saizen REIT, for example.
See my response to Felix Leong who said I was plainly lucky:
Saizen REIT: Right prices and luck.
Saizen REIT: Right prices and luck.
Investing in bona fide income generating assets can hardly go wrong.
When there is mispricing, we could possibly make more money.
When compared to real estate, mispricing is not as rare when it comes to REITs.
In recent years, I increased my investments in non-REITs but it wasn't because I felt that REITs were no longer relevant to income investors.
Investing in income generating non-REITs is just a way to avoid concentration risk.
Yes, REITs reduce concentration risk but having 100% of our portfolio in REITs also creates concentration risk.
OK, before I confuse myself further, I better stop.
Remember, this is just AK talking to himself, as usual.
It is never my way or the highway.
References:
Recently published:
Lost on Alibaba and $200K left...
Lost on Alibaba and $200K left...