Be cautious even as we accept higher risks.

When I did a Diploma in Business, I had to study Business Law. One thing I remember is that something we buy has to be "fit for the purpose it was built for" and be "of merchantible quality".

So, let's say you bought a contraption which was supposed to keep food fresh but it did not; then, it was not fit for the purpose it was built for. If the contraption really did keep food fresh but it started to fall apart within the first week of use, then, it was not of merchantible quality.

Singapore's Lemon Law which kicked in on 1 September 2012 stipulates a 6 months period in which buyers now have to take action on any defective product. This addresses the issue of "merchantible quality".

In the weekend edition of The Business Times, I read an interesting article on whether conventional wealth management wisdom which says that people nearing retirement should have more of their wealth in conservative bonds is "fit for purpose". This actually raised a question in my mind as to whether wealth managers are providing products which are fit for purpose or are they self serving sales people.

In the few encounters I had with wealth managers, I was advised to be more aggressive with my investments because people in their 30s and early 40s could afford to do so. One asked me why was I so conservative when I told him I was not interested in any of his proposals which sounded rather risky to me. I was then advised that only people nearing retirement should be more conservative.

So far, my personal experience with wealth managers has not been positive, having lost much money through products they sold to me. Unlike physical goods, wealth managers do not have to provide any guarantees as to a financial product's performance. This could be the reason why when the Mini Bonds and other structured products offered a "capital guaranteed" feature, they drew so many investors. Of course, they were not of "merchantible quality" but no buyer could tell until things fell apart. Unlike physical goods, it was too late to do anything.

In an environment of very low interest rates and high inflation, we have to seek higher returns on capital to protect our wealth. However, we have to exercise caution even as we accept higher risks.

Related posts:
1. Low interest rates' a double whammy for some.
2. To protect our wealth, we have to take risk.
3. Fraud: Like taking candy from a baby.

Silver bullion coins.

Sharing photos of some silver bullion coins I own:

I still believe that people who have some extra cash should own some investment grade gold and silver as a hedge against the flaws of fiat currencies. Where silver is concerned, I think the Canadian Maple Leaf is one of the purest around. Relatively cheaper too.

Read my latest piece on the topic in my blog on precious metals:
Gold and silver: Still important assets to own.

Related post:
Buy gold and silver as insurance.

Olam: A time bomb?

The high profile standoff between Muddy Waters and Olam is not about something new. Earlier this year in June, I wondered at Olam's share buy backs as well. I blogged about it and attached a section of research done by Kim Eng on the company then.

What Muddy Waters has said does make sense and Olam has to focus on its business rather than its share price.

Should Olam come to collapse (as we believe it will), its use of much-needed cash to buy back shares at this time should give rise to questions about whether fiduciary responsibilities have been breached – particularly given the possible existence of individual motivations that are not necessarily aligned with those of Olam’s lenders.  - Taken from Muddy Waters' open letter to Olam.

To read the letter in full, go to Muddy Water's website: here.

So, is Olam going kaput in time? I know that Sunny Varghese was at the helm of Cityspring Infrastructure Trust. I was not impressed with that entity and was lucky enough to exit with a small gain. Is he able to do much better with Olam?

Short sellers could home in on Olam in time and it would be interesting to see how things turn out.

Related posts:
1. Olam: Share price up on buy backs.
2. Cityspring Infrastructure Trust: Rights issue.

First REIT: 30,900,000 new units.

First REIT is having a private placement, issuing 30,900,000 new units at 95c each. This is to help pay for acquisitions announced earlier in September.

How will this impact existing unitholders?

Other than the advance distribution for the period 01 October to 25 November which is nice to have, existing unitholders' interest in the trust is going to be diluted.

The REIT has approximately 632,645,000 units in issue. The 30,900,000 new units will add 4.88% to the total units in issue.  Based on an estimated pro forma DPU of 6.77c, post acquisitions, the DPU post private placement is estimated to be 6.455c or 1.614c per quarter.

In 3Q 2012, the DPU was 1.68c. Annualised, it gives us 6.72c. So, unit holders seem to be better off pre acquisitions and private placement. We are likely to see a 3.93% reduction in DPU in future.

At a price of $1.02 per unit, I now estimate a distribution yield of 6.32%. If unit price should decline to 95c which is what the private placement's investors would be paying, distribution yield would be 6.65%.

The advantage of the private placement is that it would strengthen the balance sheet of the REIT without incurring hefty costs which would come with a rights issue as the amount raised is not big. However, the expected dilution and a possibly lower DPU in future is unpalatable.

See announcement: here.

Related posts:
1. First REIT: Acquisitions in Manado and Makasar.
2. First REIT: 3Q 2012.

Flew United Airlines SG-Japan-USA (but never again).

Added on 12 April 2017:

OMG! This is what they do on United Airlines these days?



I won't fly United Airlines anymore.
------------------
I am back! It is good to be home.

It has been a while since I went on a trip to the USA. I no longer enjoy very long flights and flying to the USA takes a VERY long time. 

Then, there is the time difference which I find harder to adjust to as I grow older. 

Then, there are all those pre-dawn flights which means being at the airport at 3 or 4am which means waking up in the middle of the night. 

Then, there is the returning to Singapore past midnight. Really tiring.

There is always a need to layover in an Asian city and although some would complain about this, I actually enjoy such layovers. 

I always fly American airlines like United, Northwest or Delta to the USA and the layovers are always in Narita, Japan. 

It is the same this time.

A two to three hours layover is just about right. I would have enough time to have a hot meal and do some window shopping in the airport as well. 

On this trip, I had a bowl of hot udon soup on my outbound journey and a very delicious cheese and ham toast on my inbound journey.

Many hungry for a hot meal!

A bowl of hot udon soup for 750 Yen. Think this is expensive? Try ordering the same in the USA!

DOUTOR has more than 900 outlets in Japan! 

Croque Monsieur is a toast with three types of cheese and ham!
Add a bottle of Genmai Cha for 550 Yen. Heavenly!

Ah, makes me feel like going on a holiday to Japan again. The JPY has weakened quite a bit since my last trip in December 2011. Should I? Hmm...

See photos of my December 2011 trip to Japan: here.

LMIR: 3Q 2012 DPU 0.73c.

A reader sent me an email and asked if I would be writing about LMIR's 3Q 2012 results. I admit that I was wondering if I should just skip it this time.

LMIR announced a DPU of 0.73c which is lower than the 0.79c declared in 2Q 2012. This is despite the fact the distributable income improved 37.9%, year on year.

In my blog post on the REIT's 2Q 2012 results, I was optimistic that the REIT's DPU would improve further as its gearing of 9.3% meant that it had plenty of debt headroom for yield accretive purchases. However, the management has squandered the enviable low gearing level as a slew of recent acquisitions were DPU dilutive in nature. Post rights, I estimated a DPU of 0.815c and it does not look like it is going to happen anytime soon.

Unless unitholders were active in acquiring nil-paid rights as they were sold down to 2.1c, I believe we were better off pre-rights compared to post-rights. Pre-rights, we were enjoying quarterly DPU in excess of 1c and unit price was very much the same level as it is now. Those of us who bought into the nil-paid rights cheaply would have made capital gains of between 20+% to 40+% in less than a year, excluding income distributions received in the same period. Those who did not do so are not any better off.

Only time will tell us the quality of a REIT's management and LMIR's has disappointed so far.

See 3Q 2012 financial statements: here.

Related posts:
1. LMIR: 2Q 2012 DPU 0.79c.
2. LMIR: More acquisitions and lesser DPU again.
3. LMIR: More benefits from acquiring 4 malls?

Build a bigger retirement fund with CPF-SA (UPDATED).

Young working adults could use their CPF-SAs to grow their retirement funds, risk free, at a faster clip.  

This is a valid and relatively fuss free approach to long term wealth accumulation.

If you think that the additional 1.5% per annum paid on the CPF-SA does not amount to much, I would encourage you to read a blog post of mine written more than two years ago. 

In the last few paragraphs, I explained how transferring funds from CPF-OA to CPF-SA could significantly boost returns.

See: 
Do you want to be richer?





The additional 1% interest paid annually on the combined first $60K in our CPF accounts is another strong incentive for us to use our CPF accounts to grow our retirement funds.

If you are interested to know more, go to the comments section of the blog post:

Want to be wealthier without higher risk?

For risk free, long term savings with significantly higher returns, the best option for average Singaporeans is still the CPF-SA.






Other related posts:
1. SRS, CPF-OA and CPF-SA.
2. SRS: A brief analysis.

Protect your iPad mini.

Thinking of protecting your iPad mini from knocks and don't want to spend too much money at the same time? How does US$3.81 sound to you?

Yes, for only US$3.81, you will get a TPU shell for the iPad mini! Free shipping!

It comes in various colors too!

 

Shop online at:

 and search under New Arrivals.

You can't miss it!

Related post:
Save money with low prices and free shipping globally!

Category A COE hits record $77,201!

The premium in Category A, for cars below 1,600cc, surged $6,200 in the lastest bidding exercise, surpassing the previous high of $73,501 set in early August.

Easy financing is contributing to continuing demand. "Demand is still there, even as the economy slows down, and it is being propped up by cheap loans. So, as long as the monthly repayment is within the buyer's budget, he will get that new car."

(Source: The Business Times, 8 Nov 12.)

My reaction to this bit of news? This is totally mind-boggling!

Boggled at #1:
$77,201 for a certificate to own a car and a small one too.

Boggled at #2:
If monthly repayment is within budget, buy the car!

There are many rich people in Singapore. Bloomberg reported that there are 17 millionaire households out of every 100 households in Singapore in June 2012! Exact figure: 188,000 households.

I guess if buyers are able to afford a car at such astronomical prices using their own savings and if they really need the car, it is ok. If they don't need a car, why buy one?

However, if buyers are only able to afford a car because of the cheap loans available (which suggests that they have insufficient savings), it is not ok. This is especially so if they don't need a car.

Just off the top of my head, buying a $120k 1.5 litre Japanese car today and, to lose as little money per year to depreciation as possible, driving it for 10 years could see the buyer taking back only $7k at the end of the period. That is a loss of $11.3k per year or $942 per month!

In the above scenario, if the buyer draws a monthly salary of $4k, almost 25% of his monthly earned income is gone with the wind! If he really needs a car, it would be more prudent to look for a pre-owned car with a monthly depreciation of $400 or so. This would be a less destructive 10% of his monthly earned income.

People usually look at the running cost of car ownership: petrol, parking, road tax, insurance, ERP, maintenance and repairs. They sometimes forget depreciation which is a bigger than ever consideration in today's environment given the high price of the COE.

Any person thinking of buying a car in Singapore now, please think and think again.

Related posts:
1. Quick, buy a new car cheaper now!
2. A new car for $75,000?
3. Bought a new car!
4. The price of my car now.

President Obama wins! What next?

President Obama has been re-elected! Seems that Mr. Ben Benanke's job is safe. More quantitative easing, a weaker US$ and stronger inflationary pressure? Seems like it.

People are concerned about the "fiscal cliff". Could it turn out to be a non-event? Could the Democrats and Republicans reach a compromise?

What is the "fiscal cliff" all about and why should we be concerned?

If the current laws slated for 2013 go into effect, the impact on the economy could be dramatic. While the combination of higher taxes and spending cuts would reduce the deficit by an estimated $560 billion... the policies set to go into effect would cut gross domestic product (GDP) by four percentage points in 2013, sending the economy into a recession.

See full write up at: The fiscal cliff explained.

President Barack Obama won re-election in a tight campaign, besting Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney in enough swing states to secure four more years in office.

The specter of gridlock would undoubtedly loom before Obama as he confronts an immediate task in addressing the series of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts – the so-called “fiscal cliff” – set to spring into place at the end of this year. As Obama won a second term, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Republicans’ retention of their House majority meant “the American people have also made clear that there is NO mandate for raising tax rates.”

Read full story at: NBC News!

The story does not end with President Obama's re-election, for sure. Another chapter is about to begin.

Want to be wealthier without higher risk?

More than a year ago, I wrote about a conversation I had with someone who was worried about the effects of inflation on his personal wealth. By chance, I met him over the weekend and we spoke briefly. He lamented that he did not listen to me as he could not come to terms with the idea that to protect his wealth, he had to take risk.

This reminds me of a saying in Hokkien I heard recently:
Afraid that grasping too loosely might let the bird fly away and that grasping too tightly might kill the bird.

So, fearing the wealth destructive effects of higher inflation, he wants higher returns from investments that have higher risk but the problem is that he cannot accept the higher risk!

If not for the fact that he looked so serious and troubled, I would have made a joke out of it.

This person is very careful with his money. Perhaps, too careful. Well, he has a family to care for and with young kids, I suppose he is right to fear risk. If there should be an investment that would offer him high returns with near zero risk, I am sure he would have jumped on it, but is there such a thing?

Anyway, I did not know what to say to make him feel better and after making some small talk, I bid him farewell. Would you know what to say to make someone feel better in such a situation?

Some people are just ill disposed to risk taking. Live and let live, I guess.

The paradox is that he is actually already taking risk by leaving his money in his bank account in the current low interest rate, high inflation environment and he is definitely not growing any wealthier.

Related post:
To protect our wealth, we have to take risk.

Music and movie!

 

 

I am Your Superstar -

Win a 2NE1 Limited Edition Autographed CD

with Nikon CoolPix S01!

Find out how at: NikonClub!

 

It is movie time!

 

Do you have a pet? Everyone who has a pet would know how heartbreaking it is when your pet leaves you.

For Victor Frankenstein he doesn't want to lose his beloved pet dog Sparky. He brings Sparky back to life only to face unintended and monstrous consequences.

Catch Tim Burton's Frankenweenie for a thrilling ride of comedy, adventure and horror!

 

See the previews at: Frankenweenie!

 

Sound Global: Smart money is buying.

On 17 Oct, I mentioned a downside target of 48c for Sound Global's share price. This might or might not materialise. Personally, I am not averse to buying a few bids higher if the technicals tell me that it could be a good idea.

As Sound Global's share price declined, volume has also declined. This picture of a low volume pull back suggests that the selling is weak. Indeed, looking at the MACD, we see a higher low possibly forming. Looking at Chaikin Money Flow, we see how money flow has turned positive even as its share price weakened lately.

Immediate resistance is at 51c while immediate support is at 49.5c.

This is another stock I am accumulating on weakness.

Water treatment investments are set to double in the 12th Five Year Plan Period (2011-2015) to CNY430b in an effort to improve China’s wastewater treatment rate to 85% by 2015, from 77% currently. Commercialisation and privatisation of the Chinese water treatment market is also a long-term trend. With over 20 years of experience, Sound Global has become one of the leading one-stop integrated wastewater treatment solution providers in China, with a respectable market share.

 

In our view, Sound Global’s revenue will be supported by: 1) continuous order wins thanks to a long-term relationship with the government, and 2) more BOT projects entering their collection period. A hike in water tariffs in China will also have positive effect on revenue.

 

Although we are positive on Sound Global’s revenue outlook, its high net margin of the past few years would be very hard to maintain, in our view. Recent high-cost borrowing will weigh on the company’s net margin for the next few years, assuming it does not redeem the senior notes before maturity.

 

Sound Global is trading at a large discount to its peers (6.7x FY12PE based on consensus vs average of 12.8x for HK-listed peers and Hyflux’s 16.7x). We currently do not have a rating and target price on Sound Global. However, we think the deep discount may not be justified given Sound Global’s comparable net margin and higher-than-peers ROE. Sound Global is worth considering if investors are looking for cheaper alternatives.
 

(Maybank Kim Eng, 8 Oct 12)

Related post:
Sound Global: Accumulate on weakness.