An eye on Accordia Golf Trust, Croesus Retail Trust and Saizen REIT: 8.1 magnitude earthquake in Japan and the Yen.

On Vesak Day, a huge undersea earthquake was reported 874 kilometers from Tokyo. The epicentre was deep in the Pacific Ocean. Seismologists warned that another quake could be coming. See report here: Japan Today.

Expecting some negative reaction from Mr. Market, I looked at the prices of Accordia Golf Trust, Croesus Retail Trust and Saizen REIT this morning. Of the three, the unit price of Accordia Golf Trust retreated by almost 10%. It was a big decline but it probably had to do with the fact that the counter went XD as well.

Accordia Golf Trust announced their maiden DPU of 5.71c for the 8 months period since its date of listing. This included non-recurring gains. Based on the regular operation of the golf courses under management, it was estimated that full year DPU could come in at 6.23c. However, this was based on an exchange rate of S$1 to JPY 88.4. This was a couple of months ago.

Of course, the JPY has weakened significantly since then. The rate is now S$1 to JPY 92. This rate was last seen in late 2014 and could be the reason for the particular weakness in Accordia Golf Trust when the unit prices of both Croesus Retail Trust and Saizen REIT held up rather well. Accordia Golf Trust is, after all, the only one of the three that does not hedge currency risk and we must rightly expect DPU to reduce in S$ terms, therefore.

If we expect the DPU to reduce proportionally, we might see a revised full year DPU of 5.91c. Buying more at 71c to 72c a unit today means a distribution yield of 8.2% to 8.32%. If we need a minimum yield of 8% to make the investment worthwhile for us, then, based on the current weaker exchange rate, all else remaining equal, we should be able to accept a unit price of up to 74c or so. Coincidentally, this was the entry price of my current long position too.

Further weakness in the JPY cannot be discounted but I have made a case before on why I think the JPY's biggest declines are probably behind us. Getting into Accordia Golf Trust at its IPO was a bad idea for various reasons. At current prices, I believe that the business trust presents a decent enough investment for the income investor.

See an article in NextInsight on Accordia Golf Trust: here.

Related posts:
1. Accordia Golf Trust: Yield of 12.16%?
2. Croesus Retail Trust: ONE's MALL.
3. Saizen REIT: Deeply undervalued.

Saizen REIT: Deeply undervalued but is it a BUY for you?

Regular readers know that I have been invested in Saizen REIT for a long time. Some might even be able to write a script for a K-drama based on my experience with the REIT. Anyway, if you are interested in the history, just use the search function found in the top right area of this blog. I shan't bore you.

I mentioned Saizen REIT in the last "Evening with AK and friends" session and went on to highlight why it is one of my top 3 investments in REITs. I think that episode might have interested quite a few members of the audience as I received not one, not two but three emails asking me whether the REIT is priced fairly now. I must say that the emails weren't phrased exactly like this but they were close enough.

Taken on my last trip to Japan. Love the chocolates. Cheap too.

I will say that we must question, as always, our motivation for thinking of investing in Saizen REIT. Is it for income or capital gain?

For someone who is thinking of capital gain, the fact that Saizen REIT is trading at a huge discount to valuation might be the reason for his interest. At 86c a unit, it is trading at more than 20% discount to its NAV/unit of about $1.10. This is despite the continual fall in the JPY against the S$. Even at its high of 98c touched almost a year ago, it would still have been undervalued based on the weaker JPY today.

The first question we have to ask, of course, is whether the NAV is realistic. The best way to ascertain this is to see what price Mr. Market is willing to pay for the REIT's properties. In September last year, I said that the REIT sold two properties at premiums of 19% and 12.8% above book value. That told me that the REIT's NAV was conservative. In the REIT's February 2015 presentation, they reported that another property was sold at 16% above valuation.

There is some deep value in Saizen REIT's portfolio of freehold residential properties in Japan, I believe. However, whether the value could be unlocked and returned to unit holders is much harder to say. Could we see an acquisition by a residential J-REIT? I know that a substantial shareholder, Argyle Street Management (ASM) was pressing for something to this effect.

So, anyone who is buying into Saizen REIT, hoping for value to be unlocked, will have to be patient and also remember that it might or might not happen. While waiting, Saizen REIT offers about 6c in DPU per year. Based on 86c a unit, that is a distribution yield of about 7%.

For someone who is thinking of investing in Saizen REIT for income, it is important to bear in mind that income is generated in JPY by the REIT's assets but converted to S$ for distribution. There is always risk in foreign exchange rates. What do I think?

Gingko tree. So many of them in Japan.

The JPY has fallen a lot in the last 2 years against the S$. It is my opinion that any further fall is likely to be mild as:

1. The S$ is also weakening because the M.A.S. is mindful that Singapore must remain competitive and with the dramatic fall in the price of crude oil, Singapore's economy has become mildly deflationary of late.

2. The Japanese government wouldn't want to cause hardship for the Japanese people which any greater fall in the value of the JPY might bring. Already, the people are grappling with much higher inflation in prices of imported goods.

Having said this, for the income investor, what is very important to note is that Saizen REIT's loans are amortising in nature. I have mentioned this many times in the past when I was more active in blogging about the REIT. This means that the principle sums shrink over time as they are paid down. Amongst S-REITs, Saizen REIT is probably the only one that has this feature.

Also, amongst S-REITs, Saizen REIT is probably the only one with very long term loans with many maturing in the 2030s and 2040s. Long term loans actually make sense for REITs because property investments are, logically, long term commitments.

Anyway, the point is that because the loans are amortising in nature, Saizen REIT cannot distribute all its income to unitholders. Some of it goes to amortising the loans. However, because Saizen REIT amassed quite a bit of cash from many of its unit holders who exercised their warrants, they are able to use that money to amortise the loans, distributing income as if the loans were non-amortising. One day, this money will run out. Then what?

Then, everything remaining equal, we might see the DPU reduce by two fifths. So, distribution yield might become 4% then. This is something investors in Saizen REIT at the current price must be aware of and be comfortable with.

I estimated before that it would be many years down the road before it happens but when it does happen, the REIT would be even stronger in its balance sheet as its debt burden would have reduced significantly. I like this very much as it would give the REIT more debt headroom to acquire more properties which would mean a higher DPU. In other words, the REIT would be able to grow without having to raise funds from its unit holders.

There are many things which I cannot foresee happening or not happening. Could Abenomics breathe life into Japan's economy in a sustainable manner? Would demand for housing improve, leading to higher occupancy and asking rents? Would the JPY sink much lower?  These are some questions I do not have definite answers to.

However, there are some things that I do know and those are the things that inform my decision to be invested in Saizen REIT, those are the things that tell me Saizen REIT matches my motivation as an income investor. If there should be an unlocking of value sometime in the next few years, it would be a bonus for me. In the meantime, I am quite happy to be paid regularly.

Related posts:
1. Saizen REIT: Sell the entire portfolio?
2. Saizen REIT: Is the dividend sustainable?
3. Saizen REIT: Why did I buy? Would I buy more?

Saizen REIT: Sell the entire portfolio or find a larger partner.

One of my more successful investments in the last few years is probably in Saizen REIT and regular readers who have followed the story would be quite familiar with it. So, I shan't repeat the narrative.

In the past issue of The EDGE, it was reported that a major investor in Saizen REIT is unhappy with the lack of growth in the REIT. Well, actually, the fact that Argyle Street Management (ASM) is unhappy isn't anything new and I blogged about my view in November last year.

Now, the CIO of ASM is suggesting that "we either sell the entire portfolio or find a much larger partner." There is quite a bit of frustration but it is probably justifiable.

This is because Saizen REIT's NAV/unit is $1.22 and it is trading at around 90c a unit. If all the REIT's properties were to be sold at valuation, shareholders would receive $1.22 a unit or a 35% gain from the current market price. So, if there should be a willing buyer, selling the entire portfolio at valuation makes sense.

In fact, I am inclined to believe that Saizen REIT's properties are worth much more since they managed to sell a property in May at 19% above book value and another one in August at 12.8% above book value. This suggests that the book values of the REIT's properties are rather conservative.

The REIT's NAV could be about $1.35 to $1.40 per unit. This means a potential capital gain of 50% to 55.5%. It is, however, I believe, harder to find a buyer for the entire portfolio at such high prices.

Well, whether or not the current managers of Saizen REIT are replaced, for me, is less important than how my investment in the REIT could be impacted.

I have examined before the sustainability of the current day DPU and, if I remember correctly, I said it should be sustainable for the next 8 years. Could we see the Japanese economy and currency strengthen in the next 8 years? I don't know but I do know that there is enough resources to maintain the current level of distributions for a few more years. Beyond that, I expect DPU to reduce, everything else remaining equal.

A DPU of 6.3c translates to a distribution yield of about 7% at a unit price of 90c. If I should be paid $1.22 per unit for my investment in the REIT, I would liken it to collecting many years of income distributions in advance which is not a bad thing. A bird in hand is worth two in the bushes, as the saying goes.

So, am I going to increase my exposure to the REIT? No. Why? Isn't it a good investment for income? I believe it is but my exposure to the REIT is already quite large and I estimate it to be some 12% or 13% of my entire portfolio. My only other two investments which are bigger are AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT and First REIT. I don't see any need to increase the weighting of any of these REITs in my portfolio.

What if I did not have any exposure? Well, if I should be happy being paid a 7% distribution yield buying into rather undervalued freehold Japanese residential real estate, I might initiate a long position. Then, all that is left for me to do is to wait.

Related posts:
1. Saizen REIT: Good investment for income?
2. Saizen REIT: Undervalued.
3. Saizen REIT: Is the dividend sustainable?

Accordia Golf Trust: At what price is it a BUY?

Some readers asked me at what price would I be interested in Accordia Golf Trust since I have said that I was not willing to pay the IPO price of 97c a unit, believing that it did not represent good value for money although it promised a 7% distribution yield.

Some asked me if they should start buying once the unit price goes under the NAV per unit of 92c because with its IPO in Singapore just 0.7x subscribed, it could see unit price sinking quite rapidly on the first day of trading.

Of course, I almost never give a clear answer to questions like this.




However, I will say that although it could be nice to buy something below its NAV, when we are investing for income, we really want to see whether the level of income that is being generated is attractive enough and how much of that promised income to be distributed is sustainable.

To do this, I looked into the Trust's gearing. The first observation is the very high gearing level of about 53%. That is similar to Croesus Retail Trust's current gearing level and yet Accordia Golf Trust could only promise a distribution yield of 7%.

Next, I looked at the way its debt has been structured. Long term debt really consists of three term loans of JPY 15 billion each.

The first term loan is for 3 years and the cost? 1.25% +
The second term loan is for 4 years. 1.5% +
The third term loan is for 5 years. 1.75% +

What is that "+" for? Cost of debt is actually a base percentage + the 6 months JPY TIBOR. If you don't know what TIBOR is, it stands for Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate which is forecast to be about 0.3%.

I feel that the TIBOR is likely to stay low for some time as Prime Minister Abe keeps borrowing costs low to encourage economic growth and works towards a targeted sustainable inflation rate of 2% per annum for the country. So, there could be some comfort there despite the high gearing level.

Just like Saizen REIT's loans, the term loans here are amortising in nature. Per term loan, the Trust has to pay JPY 75 million half yearly starting 31 March 2015. This means JPY 75 million x 6 in a year starting 31 March 2015. Per year: JPY 450 million.

On top of this, interest payment if estimated on the high side using 2% is about JPY 0.9 billion or 900 million

With total annual comprehensive income at almost JPY 6 billion, yearly debt repayment will be about 22% of annual comprehensive income from March 2015 to July 2017. In August 2017, the 3 year term loan will have to be fully paid.

Of course, by then, let us hope that the Trust would have found some way of refinancing since it would probably be impossible for them to pay off the remaining JPY 13.6 billion or so in the first term loan using internal resources.

Accordia Golf Trust's guidance is to pay out 90% of its income to unit holders from the 2nd year onwards but what is the distributable income available then? Ah! That is a question people might not have asked as they simply assumed that it would be 90% of the first year's DPU.

At the exchange rate of S$12.20 to JPY 1,000, assuming an annual comprehensive income of S$73.2 million and almost 1.1 billion units in issue, we would get a DPU of 6.65c if 100% of income is distributed to unit holders. If we should expect that only 78% of comprehensive income would be available for distribution from March 2015, then, DPU falls to 5.2c. If we still want that 7% yield, then, unit price has to fall to 74c which is a 24% decline from the IPO price.

Now, if only 90% is to be distributed, DPU could be as low as 5.2c x .9 or 4.68c.

So, at what price would I be interested in initiating a long position in Accordia Golf Trust? Let me talk to my bowling ball and I hope it is in a talkative mood.

Related post:
Accordia Golf Trust: 7% distribution yield.

Saizen REIT and Croesus Retail Trust: Much ado about Yen.

A reader sent me an email and expressed worry that the JPY might weaken further against the S$. With exposure to Saizen REIT and Croesus Retail Trust, he is worried.

For sure, the JPY has weakened dramatically in the last 2 years (and a few months) against the S$. By now, it has weakened some 25% or so. It might weaken further or it might not. I am sure there are arguments made in favour of both cases.

I think, as investors, we have to know clearly what is our motivation for investing in Saizen REIT and Croesus Retail Trust. If we are investing for income and if we have not overpaid in either case, I feel that we have little to worry about.

Luz Shinsaibashi, Osaka.

Both Saizen REIT and Croesus Retail Trust hedge exchange rate risk. So, even if the JPY were to weaken another 10% in the next six months, their next income distribution in S$ will barely be affected. Similarly, if the JPY were to appreciate significantly in the next six months, don't expect any big gain in DPU, everything else remaining equal.

Of course, the income distribution after the next could be hedged at an even lower exchange rate if the JPY is weaker by then. Yikes! Yes, this is one of the risks that comes with investing in anything that receives income in a foreign currency.

With Saizen REIT trading at 88c a unit and giving a DPU of about 6.5c, we are looking at a yield of 7.38%. Croesus Retail Trust is trading at about 89c and will offer an annualised DPU of about 9.3c, by my estimate, or a distribution yield of 10.44%, after its recent acquisitions. Double digit yield, anybody?

Of course, we have to remember that Saizen REIT has a much stronger balance sheet compared to Croesus Retail Trust and that they own different types of properties.

In the event that the JPY weakens another 5 or 10%, what would the impact be on the distributable income in S$ terms? Yield falls to 6.64% for Saizen REIT and to 9.45% for Croesus Retail Trust? Is that so unpalatable? Is that a catastrophe?

Photo of the Great Buddha in Kamakura I took on a trip in December 2011 when JPY was at its highest against the S$.

Investing for income is supposed to give us some measure of equanimity even if the equity market sails through a storm. If the slightest hint of choppy waters scares us to bits, we might want to look at our motivation for being invested again and also check to make sure that we have not invested with money we might need in the next few years.

There must be a reason for our fear. Find it.

Related posts:
1. Saizen REIT: Is the DPU sustainable?
2. Croesus Retail Trust: Recent acquisitions.
3. Motivations and methods in investing.
4. Be comfortable with being invested.

Croesus Retail Trust: Motivations and risks........ (Updated on 16 Sep 15 with a video and list of key take-aways.)

I was having a conversation with a friend in a chat box and he asked me what are the risks investing in Croesus Retail Trust. I rattled off a list of risk factors and I am sure it wasn't even exhaustive.

Every investment has risk factors and the important thing for me is to ask if these are acceptable. How do I know if they are acceptable? I would have to know my motivations as an investor.

So, if we are investing for income, then, we should ask which risk factors are more significant to us. What are the things we should be paying more attention to.

If Croesus Retail Trust should consistently produce an 8.5% yield for me as an investor for income, this is one factor that would keep me quite contented. I would have less problem with keeping the status quo.

Over the next two years, with a currency hedge in place, distributable income in S$ terms is more or less predictable. After that, assuming zero growth in distributable income in JPY terms, income received in S$ terms will depend on the prevailing exchange rate. Of course, the manager could continue hedging exchange rate risk and it could be a sensible thing to do at that point in time. It is hard to say anything conclusive about this now.

They might not have to do so since my own experience with the JPY tells me that it is now near its lowest point since I first really visited the country in 1998. The lowest in recent months was S$ 12.20 to JPY 1,000. Although it could go lower, I suspect that it wouldn't go very much lower than that.

As the BOJ has mentioned many times before, Abenomics is not about devaluing the JPY. A devalued JPY would cause immense hardship for the Japanese people and it is not in any government's interest to have hyper inflation.

So, the JPY is likely to strengthen from current levels or stay where it is once Mr. Abe gets the 2% inflation that he wants for the economy. This is all in the realm of reason.

Of course, if Japan should experience a 2% inflation, logically, interest rate should go up. This would translate into a lower level of distributable income in JPY terms, everything else remaining equal.

If the JPY should appreciate against the S$ by then, a higher interest rate could be a non-issue. Otherwise, we could see DPU in S$ terms reducing. How much would interest rate increase to? How much would DPU reduce to in such a case?

Well, if the Trust should pay 1% more in interest on its debt, roughly, we could see a 10% reduction in DPU. What about 2%? Maybe, a 20% reduction. This is the best we can do. Estimates. Then, ask if a 10% to 20% reduction in DPU would still make the Trust an attractive investment for us.

At $1.18, Croesus Retail Trust didn't make my list.

$1.07? Still a "NO".

$0.965? Maybe.

$0.845? Looking attractive but where was the floor?

$0.87? Found a floor, perhaps. Buy some.

Of course, I did consider other risk factors before deciding that Croesus Retail Trust would make a decent investment for income. 

Read related posts and some of the comments generated therein by following the links provided at the end of this blog post, if you are interested.

Once we know our motivations, we know what risks are acceptable and we will know what to do.

Finally, we might not get the best prices but if we could get in at a fairly good price to start with, that is good enough.

Update (16 Sep 15):
Video by PhillipCapital



Key take-aways for me:

- 71.9% leases expiring beyond 2019.

- Mallage Shobu accounts for 20% of GRI.

- Rental reversions upwards of 20%.

- ONE's Mall and Mallage Shobu to contribute to higher income through positive rental reversions.

- Consumption likely to improve due to real wage growth and falling unemployment.

- Shopping habit in Japan changing, preferring large shopping malls.

- Croesus Retail Trust's occupancy cost* is 8 to 9% while CMT is about 17% and FCT is about 15%. Average occupancy cost for sub-urban malls in Japan: 12 to 15%. This means that Croesus Retail Trust has room to increase rent.

*Occupancy cost is the tenant's cost of occupying its space divided by sales.

Thanks to Raymond Ng for the tip off.

Related posts:
1. Invest in Japanese real estate.
2. Added more Croesus Retail Trust.
3. Initiated long position at 87c.

Croesus Retail Trust: Initiated long position at 87c.

I love Japan and with the Japanese Yen so low now, I am planning a trip to the Land of the Rising Sun in December. 

This might have something to do with why I initiated a long position in Croesus Retail Trust. You think so? Nah.

Croesus Retail Trust is a business trust which owns 4 shopping malls in Japan. Its IPO in May priced its units at 93c a piece which meant a slight premium of 3.3% over its NAV of 90c a unit.


Luz Shinsaibashi is a new retail building in Osaka.

The Trust dangled a distribution yield of 8% and investors lapped it up, pushing the unit price to a high of $1.18 on the first day of trading. 

An auspicious number for the Cantonese people perhaps as it sounds like "prosper everyday" but not for those who bought some then. 

Unit price declined over the next 4 months to touch a low of 84.5c on 17 Sep for an almost 29% drop.

Buying at a discount to NAV and getting a relatively high yield is an attractive combination for me. The bug bear is the relatively high gearing level of about 44%. 

Any yield accretive acquisition will probably be funded through a blend of debt and equity. So, for someone who might not have the resources to participate in a rights issue, this is something to bear in mind.

Although trading at a discount to NAV and offering a relatively high distribution yield, there was nothing to prevent unit price from declining further after touching 84.5c on 17 Sep. The good news for unit holders is that it did not.

Indeed, unit price seems to have found a floor with many times tested support at 85.5c. The confluence of the 50d and 20d MAs form the immediate support at 87c. 

With the downtrend broken and unit price moving sideways now, I decided that downside risk has reduced from a technical perspective.

The 180 days lock-up for the sponsor and their strategic partners in the Trust will end sometime this month. Will they sell 50% of their stakes? 

With trading volume so low, it could drive unit price down by quite a few notches if they should do so. Well, I simply don't know.

What I do know is that at 87c per unit, I am buying at a 3.33% discount to NAV and I will receive an estimated 8.5% distribution yield. 

If price action should test the support at 85.5c, I might buy more because there would be a bigger margin of safety then.

Now, I look forward to the Trust's first income distribution which is expected to be paid in March 2014.

Related post:
Invest in Japanese real estate: Croesus Retail Trust.

Invest in Japanese real estate: Saizen REIT and Croesus Retail Trust.

Over the weekend, I spoke with a friend who told me that his uncle is interested in investing in properties in Japan. Actually, he is not the first person to talk to me about the subject. Two other people spoke with me in the last 3 or 4 weeks expressing the same interest.

Ever since Prime Minister Shinzo Abe launched "Abenomics" in order to break the country out of vicious deflation which has lasted some 20 years, there has been renewed optimism that Japan could finally grow its economy once more. Although some might claim that Japan has joined USA and Europe in devaluing currencies, Japan has claimed that it is only bringing its currency down from an over valued position to a value that is more in sync with the current value of the US$.

Against the S$, the JPY has come down more than 20%. So, not only is Japan once again a less expensive destination for holiday seekers from Singapore, together with early signs of economic growth, it has also become a more attractive investment proposition.

Therefore, it should come as no surprise that some in Singapore should be looking at investing in Japanese real estate now. Indeed, anecdotal evidence shows that American and Chinese investors have already started doing so.

However, unless we have a lot of money and we have someone whom we can absolutely trust in Japan, I would caution against investing directly in Japanese real estate. It is complicated for foreigners to actually own a piece of real estate in Japan and we also do not have access to housing loans in the country. So, 100% cash down is required.

If we are really interested in investing in Japanese real estate, be it for rental income or possible capital appreciation, there are options right here in Singapore. Regular readers would have guessed the answer.

Off the top of my head, Saizen REIT is currently trading at about 20% discount to NAV even after the JPY has weakened so much against the S$. Gearing level has increased to 39%. At 18.7c a unit and a more conservative estimate of a 1c annual DPU due to the much weaker JPY, we are looking at a distribution yield of 5.35%. 

I do not think we can do better than this by directly buying an apartment in Japan without any leverage. The theoretical non-leveraged yield of Saizen REIT is about 3.85% and it is truly passive income compared to being a landlord of an apartment.

What about Croesus Retail Trust? It is now 96c a piece. Before the launch of "Abenomics", I was pessimistic about the retail sector and, consequently, shopping malls in Japan. In its 2011 report, Starhill Global REIT's  management said as much although not in the same words.

However, anecdotal evidence shows a revival in the Japanese retail sector since the launch of "Abenomics". As inflation returns to the Japanese economy, the people no longer defer purchases in the hope of lower prices in a deflationary environment. Consequently, this means brighter prospects for Japanese shopping malls.

At its IPO price of 93c a piece, it projected a distribution yield of 8%. However, the Trust's gearing level of 48% based on the appraised value of its properties is much higher than Saizen REIT's current gearing. Of course, gearing will magnify gains. Nonetheless, the theoretical non-leveraged yield of Croesus Retail Trust is 5.41%.

With a brighter outlook for the Japanese economy and retail sector, Croesus Retail Trust is beginning to look attractive as an investment for income.

In conclusion, with Japan's fortunes seemingly turning up, there will be an increasing level of interest in investing in Japan and real estate will be a natural consideration. We don't have to look too far to benefit from the improving fortunes of the country.

Related posts:
1. Croesus Retail Trust
2. Saizen REIT: Refinancing.

"REITs that buy apartments benefited from a shortage of new supply and a stable number of tenants in a nation where less than half of Japanese under the age of 40 own their own home. Japan has accelerated efforts under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to end deflation and boost the world’s third-largest economy, including measures to revive the property industry, which has been struggling since an asset bubble burst two decades ago. The government has a target to increase assets owned by REITs by 40 percent by 2020. "
(Source: Japan Apartment Real Estate Proving Best: Riskless Return)

S-REITs: Are we asking the right questions? (UPDATED)

A friend asked me if S-REITs are bad investments now? Why are people selling down S-REITs? 

He is somewhat concerned about his investments in S-REITs and was hoping that I will tell him what to do, I guess.

Well, I cannot and will not tell him what to do. He has to decide for himself. 

Before he can decide for himself, he has to understand his motivations for being invested in S-REITs in the first instance.





If his motivation was for income, then, ask if S-REITs still do a good job of providing regular income. 

If his motivation was for capital gain, then, he should have set a target and perhaps sold his investments when prices declined by 10% from the top, for example.

People get confused when they don't know what they want.

For me, my remaining investment in S-REITs is for income. 

Apart from Saizen REIT which could see income distribution in S$ affected by the much weaker JPY, I do not see income being affected negatively in the other S-REITs I am vested in. 

Well, at least not in the next few quarters.







So, why are people selling down S-REITs? 

There are many explanations and there has been much said about how sensitive S-REITs are to interest rates. 

An increase in interest rates will be bad for S-REITs in more ways than one. 

This is all true. 

However, we have to question also if an increase in interest rate is imminent and also if S-REITs will be immediately affected. 

Personally, I do not think so.





Of course, Mr. Market does not care what I think. This is a good thing. 

As Mr. Market goes into a manic depression, he is going to offer S-REITs at lower and lower prices. 

This means distribution yields will go higher and higher, everything else remaining equal.

Could we see S-REITs trading below NAVs once again? I have no idea but it could happen. 





If it should happen, we would have a chance to buy productive real estate at a discount once again. Guess what would I do then?

As S-REITs' unit prices climbed higher, I warned that we should be careful and not be too optimistic. 

Now, as S-REITs' unit prices decline, I will remind everyone not to be too pessimistic.

Always ask the right questions and we will know what to do.






Related posts:
1. Wealth creation in the stock market.
2. Never lose money in S-REITs?
3. Be cautious when climbing the S-REIT tree.

Saizen REIT: A brief break through.

Saizen REIT had a high volume, white candle day. Could it be that Mr. Market is more than warming up to this once upon a time unloved REIT? It certainly looks that way.

Draw some Fibo lines and we see why 21c was a strong resistance today. With volume as high as today's, however, it would be natural for any chartist to wonder if there could be a follow through in the next session.

Of course, the very long upper wick on the candle suggests the presence of very strong selling pressure as unit price tried to push higher. Look at the CMF and we see a lower high and a lower low which suggest to me that money was flowing out of the counter as price pushed higher. This could limit upside in the short term.

Fundamentally, the NAV/unit of Saizen REIT as well as its DPU in S$ terms could reduce somewhat due to the weaker JPY. Against the S$, the JPY has weakened some 20% in the last one year. So, it would not be wrong to expect lower distribution yields, all else remaining equal.

However, Saizen REIT has been on an acquisition path and this would mitigate any reduction in NAV/unit as well as DPU in S$ terms. Indeed, unit holders would have been very pleased when a higher half yearly DPU of 0.66c was paid out recently. That was a bit higher than the DPU six months earlier.

On 31 December 2012, the REIT's NAV/unit was JPY 19.21.  Based on the exchange rate of S$13.30 to JPY 1,000 today, NAV/unit works out to be S$0.255. So, at 20c a unit, Saizen REIT is still trading at a discount to NAV. Almost 22%, actually.

If units of Saizen REIT should trade at S$0.25, with an annualised DPU of 1.32c, we are looking at a distribution yield of 5.28%. For a portfolio of freehold residential properties in Japan which has seen a consistent occupancy rate of above 90%, is this good enough for Mr. Market?

There are really no comparable REITs listed in Singapore and we have to look at J-REITs to get a clue as to why Saizen REIT could look very attractive even at today's price. J-REITs' average distribution yield is just slightly above 4% now. So, at 20c a unit and with an annualised DPU of 1.32c, the 6.6% distribution yield from Saizen REIT looks extremely attractive.

With an aggressive Bank of Japan bent on their own brand of quantitative easing (QE), we could see the Land of the Rising Sun experiencing rising prices again. So, we could see Saizen REIT's portfolio of properties being valued higher in JPY terms over time. This could bump up NAV/unit in S$ terms.

However, if we look at the experience of the USA, it could take years and more than one QE before we see positive results. So, any optimism in the short term should be tempered but the longer term picture is very promising.

If Mr. Market is ready to accept a lower distribution yield of 5.5% from the REIT and 5.5% is still much higher than comparable J-REITs' distribution yields, then, we could see unit price trading higher at 24c in time to come, everything else remaining equal.

So, is Saizen REIT still undervalued now? Yes, even now, I believe that it is.

Technically, however, selling pressure was very strong as unit price tried to push past 21c. CMF shows an increase in the outflow of money from the REIT as unit price moved higher today. So, if you took some gains off the table today, I think it was a great idea. Just make sure to get back in at supports if given a chance.

Related posts:
1. Saizen REIT: Still a buy?
2. Saizen REIT: DPU 0.66c.

Flew United Airlines SG-Japan-USA (but never again).

Added on 12 April 2017:

OMG! This is what they do on United Airlines these days?



I won't fly United Airlines anymore.
------------------
I am back! It is good to be home.

It has been a while since I went on a trip to the USA. I no longer enjoy very long flights and flying to the USA takes a VERY long time. 

Then, there is the time difference which I find harder to adjust to as I grow older. 

Then, there are all those pre-dawn flights which means being at the airport at 3 or 4am which means waking up in the middle of the night. 

Then, there is the returning to Singapore past midnight. Really tiring.

There is always a need to layover in an Asian city and although some would complain about this, I actually enjoy such layovers. 

I always fly American airlines like United, Northwest or Delta to the USA and the layovers are always in Narita, Japan. 

It is the same this time.

A two to three hours layover is just about right. I would have enough time to have a hot meal and do some window shopping in the airport as well. 

On this trip, I had a bowl of hot udon soup on my outbound journey and a very delicious cheese and ham toast on my inbound journey.

Many hungry for a hot meal!

A bowl of hot udon soup for 750 Yen. Think this is expensive? Try ordering the same in the USA!

DOUTOR has more than 900 outlets in Japan! 

Croque Monsieur is a toast with three types of cheese and ham!
Add a bottle of Genmai Cha for 550 Yen. Heavenly!

Ah, makes me feel like going on a holiday to Japan again. The JPY has weakened quite a bit since my last trip in December 2011. Should I? Hmm...

See photos of my December 2011 trip to Japan: here.

Ascendas Hospitality Trust: Am I interested?

Over the weekend, a friend asked me if I would be interested in Ascendas Hospitality Trust although he knew that I am generally not interested in IPOs. He was just asking for my thoughts on the Trust.

Ariake Sunroute Hotel, Japan.

Ascendas Hospitality Trust (A-HTrust) will be offering 437.33 million stapled securities at 88 cents each for mainboard listing in its initial public offer (IPO) in Singapore.

(Source: The Business Times, 18 July 2012)

What are stapled securities?

Stapling simply means that two different securities are "stapled" together for the purposes of trading or transfers. Stapled security could comprise two or more of the same or legally different instruments, for example, a share in a company and a unit in a trust.

The trust(s) and the company(ies) can hold assets and operate businesses, but active business, such as asset management and development are typically conducted by the company while passive investments in property or funds are undertaken by the trust. In practice, the trust and the company effectively operate as one entity although the company continues to be a separate legal entity from the trust.

Source: http://www.invested.hk/invested/en/html/section/index.html

For example:

CDL Hospitality Trusts is a stapled group comprising CDL Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trust ("H-REIT"), a real estate investment trust, and CDL Hospitality Business Trust ("HBT"), a business trust.

Well, what do I think of Ascendas Hospitality Trust? I won't do a thorough analysis of the Trust because I don't really have the inclination although I will share why I am not interested in it (now).

ibis Beijing Sanyuan Hotel.

Initially, the Trust will hold 10 hotels in its portfolio. These hotels are in the countries of China, Australia and Japan with Australia contributing to some three quarters of its income. The Trust also projects an 8% distribution yield in the year 2014.

I feel that I need to be conversant in the economies of three countries and the health of their respective tourism sectors to analyse how well they could continue doing. I would also need to take into consideration that income would be collected in three foreign currencies and converted to S$ for distribution to unitholders. Foreign exchange rates would affect income in S$ terms.

So, analysing this Trust and forecasting its future income is somewhat more challenging. It is less straightforward.

Then, what about my investment in Saizen REIT? Isn't that Japanese?

I won't say that I am conversant with the Japanese economy or its housing sector but I am a bit better informed in the area. Also, it is one country, not three and I only have to look at a pair of currencies, not three.

Saizen REIT is also holding residential properties, not hotels. Demand for housing is more inelastic compared to demand for hotels and with the type of properties Saizen REIT owns, there is lesser correlation with the ups and downs of the economy. Demand for hotels, however, is very different.

Ascendas Hospitality Trust is going to demand a lot of time and effort from me if I were to be become a unitholder. An eventual 8% distribution yield? I will need a higher distribution yield to entice me into this one in view of the work I have to do.

Saizen REIT: Full Year 2011 results.

I have not blogged about Saizen REIT for some time now because there is nothing really significant to analyse after its CMBS for YK Shintoku was successfully paid up a few months ago.

I divested my investment in the REIT partially when its unit price rebounded after hitting a low in the aftermath of the triple disaster of earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis in March this year. This is because of the possibly more difficult economic circumstances which would plague the country as it feels the impact of the immense damage fully over time. Technically, it also looked as if further upside in unit price could be capped. As the situation lacks a level of clarity which I would require to invest with a peace of mind, partial divestment was the way to go.

Yesterday, Moody's cut Japan's government bond rating to Aa3 from Aa2. The new rating is three notches below Moody's top Aaa rating.

While pointing out that more than 90% of Japan's debt is held domestically, I have also acknowledged in the past that debts will have to be repaid in time as its ageing population draws down on its savings increasingly. While the downgrade by Moody's is hardly surprising and does not mean that Japan is collapsing in the immediate future, it does remind us that Japan's slide downwards has not stopped.

Having said this, I still retain a rather significant investment in Saizen REIT in absolute dollar terms as I still like the idea of having exposure to freehold residential property in a country where two thirds of its population rent the homes they stay in.

The REIT's gearing level has also dropped to just 24% and its NAV per unit (adjusted for warrants) is a relatively high 29c. Interest cover ratio is a tad low at 3.1x. DPU of 0.5c has been declared for 2H 2011 (payable on 16 Sep). An annualised DPU of 1c with a unit price of 14.9c would mean a distribution yield of 6.7%. Pretty decent.

In 1H 2012, six months later, we could see a higher DPU as a full six months income generated by YK Shintoku would be distributable to unit holders. However, bearing in mind that many properties were divested to repay its CMBS, some might question if such contribution would be significant? From memory, YK Shintoku had a very large portfolio of properties and, again based on memory, we could see DPU bumping up some 10% possibly.

The same rating agency that downgraded Japan's debt rating raised Saizen REIT's debt rating from Caa1 to B1. This is good news as it could make financing more readily available and at a lower price for the REIT. The management has mentioned its desire to raise gearing level to 35% and the better rating should help.

Saizen REIT remains a recovery story in the making. We can only wait and see if the expected more difficult economic conditions in Japan will present any challenges for the REIT in time.

Read article here:
Moody's downgrades Japan's debt rating citing large budget deficits and government debt.

See Full Year 2011 presentation slides: here.

Related articles:
Japan's debt issue and Saizen REIT.
Sanity prevails with more good news.

Email exchange with a reader on some REITs.

I have been receiving more emails from readers in the last few weeks. Although I try to answer all of them in a timely manner, it might get harder to do so in time. So, apologies in advance for late replies.  

Having said this, certain emails posed questions to which the answers could be found in my blog. Just use the Search function at the top of my blog and chances are you would find the answers. Thanks for helping me to help you. :-)

Here are some bits from an email exchange I had with a reader recently on certain REITs which might be of interest to some of us:

Reader (R): 

I was wondering about Saizen, with the price at 16.5c now.. is it still feasable to enter or is it too high? 

AK:

Saizen REIT? Well, at 16.5c, I am still not a seller but I am not a buyer too as I am already vested. If I were not vested in the REIT now and if I am happy with a 6.5% yield on freehold Japanese properties, I would buy some first. That's just me. Disclaimer applies.

R:

Hey ak very sorry i have so many questions :) May i know how the 6.5% yield for saizen reit is calculated? Thanks. Appreciate it.

AK: 

See this blog post for details:
http://singaporeanstocksinvestor.blogspot.com/2010/11/saizen-reit-1q-fy2011-results.html

R:

Hey thx!! Yea saizen would be more affordable for me than first REIT.. Which is stronger from ur point of view? Thx :)

AK:

Stronger? Hmm.. They are in two different sectors and countries. Cannot compare. They have different benefits and risks.

R:

Also, Another small question would be, do you think that the jpy/sgd exchange rate will affect the earning numbers for saizen reit in the near future?

AK:

I expect the JPY to stay strong against major currencies in the near future. Over a longer period, it is harder to say. Stay nimble.

R:

I see, i agree with that, lets say i have 10k investable assets atm how much would u say i put into reit?

how much of each reit do you own? Im really interested in Saizen and Aims but im not too sure which would be better.

AK: 

If you have $10k in cash and it is money you do not need in the next few years, you could consider putting all of it into REITs if you are after a regular income.

Saizen REIT is my largest investment although its distribution yield is estimated at only 6.5%. This is because I think the Japanese real estate market has limited downside from here and things would get better very soon.

It is also because the properties are freehold in nature. So, they are perpetual income generators. Once the last CMBS is refinanced, it would probably lead to an upgrade by rating agencies and we could see some capital appreciation too. It should trade at a 5% distribution yield in line with most REITs in Japan which means there could be a 20% upside in unit price.

AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT is my second largest investment. Its forecast DPU for 2011 is 2.08c.  At the current unit price of 22.5c, distribution yield is a nice 9.24%. This could possibly explain partially the recent buying interest. Many pension funds are invested in this REIT. These are long term investors and provide stability to the REIT's price. 

However, we have to remember that the REIT is invested in relatively short term leasehold properties in Singapore (where most industrial properties have land leases of 30 years). The REIT has to continually renew its leases but this could take the form of acquisitions to keep the average lease of its portfolio healthy. More fund raising? Yes, I think so. 

So, the yield of 9.24% is not real and we have to give some of that back. However, comparing apples with apples, if Sabana REIT is able to price its IPO at $1.05/unit which means a yield of 8% or so, we could see AIMS trading closer to an 8% yield eventually and this means there could be a 10% upside in price.

I would not put all my money in a single REIT or in any one single company. That is risky. You have to decide how much you would put in each. Good luck.

Japanese real estate: Has it bottomed?

Many asked me if I think the real estate prices in Japan has bottomed. After 20 years of decline, I believe it has.  Why am I so confident? Well, I do not have a PhD in Economics but I understand that price is a function of demand and supply.

The Japanese are fearful of buying any real estate because anyone who bought a piece of real estate in the country within the last 20 years would more likely than not have lost money and this could be as much as 50% of the original purchase price! If the person had taken a bank loan to buy that piece of real estate, including interest on the mortgage, the losses could be even higher.

Little wonder that 40% of the Japanese population rent the roofs over their heads.  Little wonder why Japanese residential real estate's rental rate declined little relative to the decline in real estate prices over the years.

OK, so the rental demand is strong and this means that rental rates would remain resilient but what about the prices of real estate in Japan? Well, the US$ is probably going lower in time. With QE2 (quantitative easing part 2) by Mr. Ben Bernanke, the fate of the US$ is sealed. Anyone who wants to get a better rate of return would be bonkers to put any money in US Treasuries.

So, what are investors to do? They want to invest in assets denominated in currencies which would gain against the US$. They want to invest in assets which would generate cash flow in currencies with relative strength against the US$. Many Asian countries offer opportunities to these ends.

The fact that Saizen REIT managed to sell quite a few of their properties in their YK Shintoku's portfolio is testament to the fact that buyers are back in the Japanese real estate market and they are looking for better returns on their investments. Money will go to where it is treated best.  Borrowing at very low interest rates and getting more than 10% yield in net property income from Japanese residential real estate is a mouth watering deal!

Even if the market has not bottomed in Japan, I believe it nearly has. This could be the next big story.

Related posts:
Saizen REIT's properties: Would I buy?
Japan's debt issue and Saizen REIT.
Invest in Asian equities and inflation is here to stay.
Buy Japanese real estate.