Cache Logistics Trust: Low gearing.

I have only mentioned Cache Logistics Trust (CLT) once before in my blog and it was in relation to AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT (AA REIT) in a blog post "Create more passive income with limited capital" on 29 May.

Anyone who has been following my blog would know that I like REITs with low gearing. On 29 May, I mentioned that AA REIT had the lowest gearing amongst industrial properties S-REITs next to the new kid on the block, CLT.  Of course, CLT is no longer the new kid on the block but its gearing level remains the lowest amongst industrial properties S-REITs.

In its report on 29 July, CLT's gearing level was at 25.5%.  DPU was 1.71c for the quarter (annualised = 6.84c).  NAV (excluding income for distribution) was 87c per unit. Interest cover ratio was 9.3x which is even higher than MLT's and this is definitely a positive.  See slides here.

On 29 July, CLT was trading at $1.01 per share. This would give a yield of 6.77% based on an annualised DPU of 6.84c. Its unit price is now 98.5c, not much lower. That's unattractive for me although I recognise that it is a relatively safe investment.

Price hit a low of 91.5c in late May which is still well above its IPO price of 88c per unit.  The price decline to late May showed classic signs of a low volume pullback and anyone who picked up some then got a fair deal.

Recent trading volume has been thin although the impending income distribution scheduled for later in November could give its unit price a nudge upwards.  Technically, the MACD has formed lower highs and lower lows while the 20dMA has gone flat after completing a dead cross with the rising 100dMA.  The 50dMA is still declining and seems set on forming a dead cross with the rising 100dMA.  All bearish signs although with volume so thin, we would be right to question the reliability of the charts.

CLT would be announcing its results on 28 October. Let's see how things go.

Related post:
Office S-REITs VS Industrial S-REITs.

Golden Agri, Kencana Agri and IndoAgri.

Crude Palm Oil has crossed the RM3,000 mark today. The long term resistance at around RM 2,780 which was taken out days ago is most probably the new support now.  The fortunes of CPO counters should continue to improve.

If not for its problems with the environmentalists, I expect Golden Agriculture to be a big beneficiary to strengthening CPO price.  If it loses more customers like it did in the past, it might not be able to ride on the improving CPO price firmly like the rest.  Technically, Golden Agriculture is correcting from overbought conditions.  It should see support at 61c and that would be a safer entry price.

A friend sent me an email a couple of weeks ago, maybe more, which he received from his broker. His broker recommended a buy on Kencana Agriculture which is much smaller than Golden Agriculture in many ways. Looking at the charts now, I am wary of this counter because it seems to display classic signs of negative divergence between price and volume, price and MACD, price and MFI as well as price and RSI.  The shorter term 20dMA seems to be flattening.  Could this loss of momentum suggest something more ominous?

IndoAgri has clear signs of being overbought.  $2.44 is the top of a double bottom like formation and it is also where the 20dMA is approximating soon. When we look at the Fibo lines, it is also the 138.2% line. It is the support to watch in case of a retreat in price. A fair entry price? It could be but it does not mean that price could not retreat further.  The longer term uptrend support is where the 100dMA is approximating.  This is currently about $2.31.

My very first post on Golden Agriculture:
Why Golden Agriculture?

FCOT: Turning around.

On 24 Sep, we observed some large volume buy ups, pushing the unit price of FCOT to 15.5c. I asked "Could it go higher in price?" and said, "From a technical perspective, it does look promising.  Volume is, after all, the fuel that drives rallies and today's volume was impressive."

FCOT released its full year results today and they are encouraging, which possibly explained the recent strength of its unit price. Total distributable income increased 78% year on year. 

The marked improvement in its distributable income has been put down to improving NPI and lower finance costs. The strong A$ also made its contribution.

DPU which is what matters to most unitholders is up 55% at 0.31c for the quarter.  This is after paying CPPU holders their due of 5.5%.  

For the full year, DPU is up 29% at 1.12c.  This is higher than my earlier estimate of 1c on 24 Sep when I said "the 3Q DPU was 0.25c. So, the annualised DPU should be about 1c. Based on today's closing price of 15.5c, the yield is 6.45%."  

So, based on the last closing price of 16.5c, the full year DPU of 1.12c represents a yield of 6.79%. (and based on 15.5c when I last did my analysis, the yield is 7.2%).

FCOT would be paying 0.5549c per unit on 29 Nov 10. FCOT's income distribution takes place half yearly.

Have things turned around for FCOT? Is it now a good investment at the current price of 16.5c? Let us look at some numbers:

1. Gearing level is now at 39.6%, lower than the 40.4% a quarter ago.  This is probably because its property portfolio saw an increase of 1.9% in valuation.

2.  NAV per unit is now at 27c due to the positive revaluation of its properties.  If all the CPPUs were converted, NAV would decline to 26c.

3. Interest coverage ratio is down at 2.48x compared to 2.74x a quarter ago.  This is a negative.

If we use FCOT's 4Q performance as a gauge as to how well it might do in the new FY, assuming that its 4Q DPU is sustainable, we would have an annualised DPU of 0.31 x 4 = 1.24c.  Based on the last closing price of 16.5c, that would give a yield of 7.5%.  This is an improvement.

Assuming that all the CPPUs are converted, it would provide FCOT with funds to the tune of $81m.  This is equivalent to about 10% of FCOT's gross borrowing.  This could bring gearing down to 36%.  Assuming that positive asset revaluation continues, gearing level could come down more in time.

However, if all the CPPUs are converted, we should also expect the total number of FCOT units in issue to increase by about 11%. This could water down the DPU of FCOT but it should not have a significant impact since FCOT would also be saving on distributions to CPPU holders at the rate of 5.5% in such a situation.

So, my answer? 

FCOT has probably turned the corner and the numbers speak for themselves. However, would I buy at the current price level? The encouraging numbers could give FCOT's unit price a lift upwards but it is obvious to any chartist that 17c is the immediate resistance. 

17c is the top of a base formation and a thrice tested resistance level in mid-January this year. However, if 17c resistance is taken out, we would have an eventual target of 20.5c.

From the looks of it, volume seems to be reducing since hitting a high on 24 Sep. In subsequent up days, volume had been lower. So, it could turn out to be a case of "sell on news". 

Immediate support is at 16c but I see a stronger support to be provided by the 50dMA which coincides with an uptrend line.  That might be a better entry price.  I do not like to chase.

See presentation slides here.

Related post:
FCOT, CCT and K-REIT.

-->

Frasers Commercial Trust’s distributable income for FY10 up 31% to $34.5m
Friday, 22 October 2010

© 2010 - The Edge Singapore

FSL Trust: US0.95c DPU.

FSL Trust has declared a DPU of US0.95c, payable on 26 November 2010. The EDGE has a good write up and the following provides some solace to unitholders worried about the early termination of charters by Groda for the two ships:

"Revenue for 3Q FY10 declined 4.9% year-on-year (y-o-y) to US$23.4 million compared to US$24.6 million in 3Q FY09. The 3Q FY10 revenue includes freight revenue of US$2.5 million earned by the vessels FSL Hamburg and FSL Singapore deployed in the product tanker spot market during the period.

"This mitigated the loss of bareboat charter lease rentals of US$3.8 million for the quarter due to the premature termination of bareboat leases for FSL Hamburg and FSL Singapore."

The decline in overall revenue is expected but it was not as bad as feared. This could possibly explain the strengthening unit price of the trust over the last couple of months.

Technically, it seems that price has hit resistance at 48c.  Could the rising 20dMA give a much needed nudge for price to move higher?  Could the more benign news plus income distribution be positive catalysts?

OBV has been gently rising which suggests that some quiet accumulation has been taking place. MFI, with its higher lows, suggests sustained demand.  Indeed, we could see the MFI decline a bit more to retest 50% and the uptrend would still be intact. MFI is a function of price and volume. So, a slight decline in price or volume or both would see it coming down.

The declining 200dMA should provide a rather strong resistance at 50c in the event of a further upmove in price. I would do a partial divestment if unit price should rise to that level.

Related post:
FSL Trust: Approaching target.

First Ship Lease Trust to distribute US0.95¢ per unit for 3Q
Friday, 22 October 2010

© 2010 - The Edge Singapore