Courage Marine: Profit warning.

Courage Marine's management issued a profit warning, expecting 1Q 2011 to turn in a loss: "The Board of Directors of the Company wishes to inform Shareholders that, despite efforts by the Group to secure deployment of its fleet, fleet utilisation was low during the first quarter of 2011. The Chinese New Year holidays in February resulted in a decrease in our fleet utilisation over the period. In addition, the Japanese quakes, tsunami and nuclear power plant disaster had temporarily halted the shipment of cargo to and from Japan, which resulted in a temporary over-supply of vessels within the Asian region. In addition, freight rates during the period remained generally low, with the BDI averaging around the 1,500 level during such period." Read announcement here.

I took the opportunity to divest most of my investment in the company at 22c/share when the price spiked on news of dual listing plans by the management. This was on 18 Jan 2011. I still retain a small investment in the company despite dismal BDI numbers as I want to see if dual listing would help reflect the value of the stock more accurately. Well, we win some and we lose some. Here is the latest BDI chart:

Technically, the counter had been range bound with resistance at 19.5c and support at 17c. Today, price broke support and touched 16.5c briefly before closing at 17c.

Gapping down today, we could see gap fill happening at 18c and that would be a good price to reduce exposure or to divest completely. Sell at resistance, that is what I would do. Panic selling would not do us any good.

Mapletree Industrial Trust: A simple analysis.

I looked at the results of Mapletree Industrial Trust (MIT) briefly when it was announced a few days ago. It didn't interest me much and so, I did not blog about it. Someone asked me a couple of days ago what I thought of it and if I would invest in the trust now.

I like industrial properties S-REITs because they probably offer a more stable source of passive income compared to office S-REITs or retail S-REITs. At least, in theory, that's how it is. I also like First REIT which is into healthcare properties. I usually choose to invest in REITs with relatively higher yields compared to their peers in the same sector. After all, investing for income, distribution yield has to be a very important consideration.

MIT's distribution yield, at the last done price of $1.08 per unit and an annualised DPU of 7.72c, is about 7.15%. I cannot say I am excited by the yield. Investing in AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT, Cache Logistics Trust or Sabana REIT would give a higher distribution yield.

At $1.08, MIT is also trading above its NAV/unit of 95c (a rich premium of 13.7%). MIT has a gearing level of 36.1% and an interest cover ratio of 6.6x. Occupancy rate is at 93.2%. So, we could possibly see distributable income increasing again in future if occupancy rate improves. This could bump up DPU by a few % but distribution yield would probably not surpass 7.8% even so (ceteris paribus).

Some numbers for easy comparison:

AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT (20.5c):
Yield: 9.76%.
NAV/unit: 27c (24% discount).
Gearing: 32%.
Interest cover ratio: 5.7x.

Cache Logistics Trust (95.5c):
Yield: 8.18%
NAV/unit: 88c (8.5% premium).
Gearing: 26.4%
Interest cover ratio: 9.5x.

Sabana REIT (94.5c):
Yield: 9.3%.
NAV/unit: 98c (3.6% discount).
Gearing: 24.9%
Interest cover ratio: 7.9x

For people who were lucky enough to invest in MIT during at its IPO at 93c per unit and are still holding on, they would be enjoying a distribution yield of 8.3% which is more attractive. What about investing in MIT now? The biggest attraction in investing in MIT now is probably its pedigree. Mapletree is, after all, an arm of Temasek Holdings. Ironclad? Probably.

What about Mapletree Logistics Trust (MLT) which has expanded through acquisitions? Back in July 2010, I mentioned that I was wary of this trust because of its high gearing of 43.6%. The management has since brought the gearing level down through equity fund raising. Its numbers are now somewhat stronger:

Mapletree Logistics Trust (90.5c):
Yield: 6.85%.
NAV/unit: 85c (6.5% premium).
Gearing: 39.4%.
Interest cover ratio: 6.7x

MLT's distribution yield is even lower compared to MIT's. Its gearing is also higher. MLT's occupancy rate is >98% and has less room to increase revenue by filling vacancies compared to MIT. If I have to choose between MLT and MIT, the latter has my vote.

See MIT presentation slides here.
See MLT presentation slides here.