Sell into the rally and stay invested.

A reader left me a comment recently:

"Many AK shares like CDG and APTT have gone up. I hope AK didn't dispose them."

Why would I sell them before?

I like being paid while I wait.

This is something I have said many times before.

Therefore, regular readers would find this quite familiar.






We buy undervalued income producing assets, receive dividends while waiting for Mr. Market to turn realistic.

We could even buy good income producing assets at fairer values, receive dividends while waiting for Mr. Market to turn optimistic.

When Mr. Market is greedy, the wait is over.






Having said this, regular readers would also be familiar with the phrase "trading around a core position".

Although I will sometimes sell into a market rally to lock in some gains, I always stay invested for income, retaining a core position.

I am an income investor at heart and more so now as a retiree but there is also no accounting for Mr. Market's moods which means staying invested is probably sensible.






Despite the fact that there are negative divergences aplenty, the bull might have legs and market euphoria could last longer.

Some readers who attended "Evening with AK and friends" might remember the way I explained what a negative divergence was.

An example is as the share price goes higher, trading volume dwindles.

Volume is the fuel that drives rallies.

If volume dwindles, the rally could be ending.






There are potential double tops as well.

We see this when the share price, having retreated from a high, tries to go higher but fails.

As prices retest recent highs, we want to see higher highs forming on the momentum oscillators such as the MACD.

If we see lower highs in such instances, we have a negative divergence.





Mr. Market's euphoria could be sputtering.

I have trimmed my investment portfolio by some 25% to 30% since my last blog post.

So, as you can see, it is not an overly big reduction.

I have sold into the rally but I am staying invested.






The rally is also a good opportunity to sell stocks which are more speculative like APTT.

APTT was really too cheap to ignore and regular readers know I was gobbling as its unit price plunged.

At one stage, it went under 13c a unit and, of course, I bought more.

The market rally has allowed me to book a gain on my investment in APTT which, I won't deny, is a pretty speculative position, whichever way we cut it.






A couple of stocks which received greater attention were SingTel and Wilmar, which I bought more of as their share prices plunged in the last one year or more.

Like APTT, they have paid me dividends while I waited.

I decided to reduce my positions in SingTel and Wilmar heavily because, to me, their charts show obvious negative divergences.

Could we see $3.00 to $3.10 a share for SingTel and Wilmar again in the next few months?

It is a rhetorical question, of course.






Certainly, we cannot predict but we can prepare.

There is no better way to be prepared than to have a full war chest.

AK's war chest says:

"Burp. Pardon me."

So, what do I do now?

I go back to being paid while waiting (and playing Neverwinter).

I am just talking to myself, of course.




Related posts:
1. Wilmar.
2. SingTel and CDG.
3. 2018 passive income and APTT.
4. Make investing easy with 3 things.

Recently published:
Ascendas Hospitality Trust.

3Q 2018 passive income (non-REITs): WILMAR.

Another business I increased exposure to in 3Q 2018 was Wilmar.

As its share price went under $3.00, I simply had to buy some.

At that price, I believe Wilmar was very undervalued and based simply on NAV per share, it was.





If the constant buying by insiders as the share price declined was anything to go by, I am in good company.

When the soft commodity cycle turns up again and it is just a matter of time when it does, Wilmar will be a major beneficiary.

Apart from this, I am also waiting for the listing of Wilmar's Chinese business in 2019 which would probably help to unlock some of Wilmar's true value which has gone unappreciated by Mr. Market.





Wilmar has become a more valuable company over the years on a per share basis but its share price has languished.

Still growing, it will become even more valuable in future and any further weakness in its share price is an opportunity to accumulate.

I believe that patient shareholders will be well rewarded with higher dividends in time to come when CAPEX finally tapers off.

Then, capital gains would logically follow.

Of course, I don't know when this is going to happen.

However, being paid while I wait makes patience more affordable.

FY2017 passive income from non-REITs (Part 4).

If you have not read the 3 earlier parts, read them HERE (PART 1), HERE (PART 2) and HERE (PART 3).

Although most of my investments have an emphasis on income, regular readers know that I also have some money in investments which would hopefully give me a mix of income and growth. 

Such investments, some bigger and some smaller, as a whole, form a smaller proportion of my portfolio compared to my investments for income.

This is consistent with the capital allocation pyramid which I have shared many times before.

Keeping this in mind, I added to my investment in Wilmar at under $3.10 a share as Mr. Market turned pessimistic in 4Q 2017.

Buying at a discount to NAV and at a price 10% lower than what Archer Daniels Midland Co paid to increase their stake more than a year ago seems like a good idea to me.

Wilmar is a growth story and I believe that value is still being created.

More valuable than it was in the past, undervalued now, we could see Wilmar's value being unlocked in 2019 if the plan to list in China succeeds.

See related post at the end of this blog for my simple analysis on Wilmar's value.

Wilmar definitely demands quite a bit of patience from investors and with a dividend yield of about 2%, it isn't anything to shout about but it is nice that I am getting some pocket money while I wait.






In the same vein as my investment thesis for Guocoland earlier in the year, I decided to put some money in Ho Bee Land towards the end of 4Q 2017.

After a run up in its share price, I waited for a retreat to a long term support which is the rising 200 days moving average (200d MA) before nibbling.

From a fundamental perspective, with a NAV per share of $4.55, my purchase was at a 47% discount to NAV which is pretty attractive to me.

Of course, there is no point in buying at a large discount to NAV if the investment just sits in our portfolio and looks pretty.






It is only a worthwhile investment if value is unlocked or if it generates an income for us.

Ho Bee Land's major shareholder owns more than 70% of the company but this, in itself, is no guarantee that value would be unlocked. So, it is important to be paid while I wait. 

Looking at the numbers, I feel that Ho Bee Land would be quite comfortable with a higher DPS but to avoid disappointment, I am going with an assumption of a rather undemanding 5c annual DPS.

Although I am quite comfortable with my entry price, I am not crazy about it and I would probably be accumulating only if Mr. Market decides to give me a better offer.







After all that has been said, I am expecting 2018 to be a year of reduced passive income as a result of having a greater proportion of investments with lower dividend yields in my portfolio.

That story to be told next year.

To conclude this final blog of 2017, FY 2017 distributions received from non-REITs:

S$ 481,902.09










So, it all works out to be approximately S$40,158.00 a month.

Without the huge distribution from Croesus Retail Trust, everything else being equal, off the top of my head, I estimate a big decline of more than 80% in my passive income from non-REITs in 2018.

Here is wishing everyone a happy, healthy and prosperous 2018!





Related post:
Accumulating Wilmar.

Accumulating Wilmar on price weakness.

When I revealed my top investments earlier this year (read related post #2 at the end of the blog), some were surprised that I had a relatively large investment in Wilmar International which isn't a typical investment for income.

Of course, long time readers of ASSI would know that not all investments in my portfolio are for income although almost all lean in that direction.




Why Wilmar?

There are not many companies in the world like Wilmar when it comes to agricultural products and their distribution. 

Wilmar has amazing breadth and depth of operations. 

Its distribution network is extensive, established and still growing. 

It is a truly impressive business entity.

Potential investors should note that Wilmar is still a growth story and there continues to be quite a lot of CAPEX. 

This will continue to impact its earnings for some time to come.

In the meantime, however, they are profitable and they do pay dividends.

Since I am quite happy to be paid while I wait to benefit from their future growth, the recent decline in Wilmar's share price is an opportunity for me to accumulate.

Similar to my investment thesis for BreadTalk, I believe that when the CAPEX at Wilmar tapers off which they one day would, Wilmar's fantastic scope and scale of business would send its earnings soaring.

And while BreadTalk's extremely high PE ratio was rather unpalatable at the time when I became an investor (read related post #1 at the end of the blog), although not strictly comparable, Wilmar is currently trading at a much lower PE ratio of about 15x.

To put this in perspective, at its highest, Wilmar closed at S$7.11 a share in January 2010. 

Based on the full year earnings per share in 2009, it represented a PE ratio of above 20x.

It is important to point out that, in 2010, Wilmar's NAV per share was about 22% lower than what it is today. 

Paying S$7.11 a share then would have been a huge premium to NAV (US$1.85 per share) back then. 

Comparatively, there is more value backing each share in Wilmar today. 

This is an important distinction to make. 

Wilmar is a more valuable business entity today than it was in 2010.

Paying $3.30 a share is relatively inexpensive as I am paying a relatively small 2% premium to NAV (US$2.38 per share). US$1.00 = S$1.36.

I am also paying a lower price than what Archer Daniels Midland Co paid about a year ago to hike its stake in Wilmar from 20% to 22%, paying S$3.38 a share. (Reference: Reuters.)

Having said this, Wilmar's share price is currently in a downtrend and it could decline further and, if that should happen, I will be quite happy to accumulate again.

Finally, investors in Wilmar must be of the patient variety. 

When CAPEX tapers off, that is when Wilmar will be able to pay more generous dividends. 

Patience, I believe, will be rewarded.

See Wilmar's AR: HERE.

Related posts:

1. Investing in BreadTalk.
2. My investment portfolio.

2016 full year passive income from non-REITs (Part 1).

During an "Evening with AK and friends", someone asked if I was going to sell my stocks as market guru Hu Li Yang was expecting a stock market crash. I said we should stay invested as the market was still awashed in liquidity and money will go to where it is treated best. See: Evening with AK and friends.



So, what did I do in 2H 2016 in the non-REITs space? I made various purchases but, mostly, I was buying DBS shares. Besides DBS, I also bought some shares of OUE Limited, PREH, Wilmar, OCBC, Breadtalk and Starhub.

(I am impressed by DBS' cost management. Their cost to income ratio keeps declining.)

The narrative for investing in OCBC was similar to the one for DBS. Although all three local banks' stocks looked cheap to me, my preference was for DBS because of the perceived cheaper valuation.


The reason for me putting some money in OCBC's stock was mostly because my long position in DBS grew so big (and I do mean BIG) that it was prudent for me to step on the brakes. 




Using a strategy I employ frequently for stocks which I am highly confident in, my relatively large position in DBS included both a core position for income as well as a trading position.

Why not UOB? 


Well, I think UOB has been a bit laid back. I am not saying that it is a bad thing, mind you, but its growth story seems less exciting.

Of course, some might say that DBS and OCBC have been more "adventurous" but I like to think that they are more enterprising.

I feel that growing their wealth management business more aggressively will continue to set them apart from UOB as that business contributes more and more to their earnings.

Next, Wilmar. I continue to like Wilmar's business strategy and their very impressive scale of operations. It is an amazingly complex business and, to be quite honest, I have no way to analyse most of its operations.

However, when Mr. Kuok thinks their shares are cheap and bought more at $3.00 a share, that was a pretty clear signal to me. At that price, we would also be buying at around its NAV which seems conservative.

Source: RHB.

Having accumulated a rather significant long position in Wilmar in recent years, I am quite happy to wait while being paid to do so.

Now, for OUE Limited. I blogged about my rationale for increasing exposure to OUE Limited when I shared my numbers for 1H 2016 (see related post #1). Back then, I added at $1.51 a share. In 2H 2016, I added more at $1.53 a share.

Twin Peaks.

My decision to increase exposure was mostly driven by the even larger discount to NAV from the time I initiated a long position. 

There is much value in OUE Limited but waiting for value to be unlocked requires a lot of patience. Well, remember, a wise man did say before that the big money is in the waiting.

Along similar line of reasoning, I also added to my investment in PREH at 80c a share a few days ago. This is the lowest price I have ever paid for PREH. The last time I bought any PREH shares was more than a year ago. 

It is interesting to me that Mr. Ron Sim, Mr. Pua S.G. and Mr. Kuok K.H. have been increasing their stakes in PREH on price weakness. 

PREH is an asset play but it is also a growth story. It is not for the faint hearted.

PREH

As for Breadtalk, I have a more recent blog post on my decision to initiate a position. I compared it to Old Chang Kee and QAF Limited, both of which I have been a shareholder of for many years. 

If you are interested to know why I had a change of heart and decided to initiate a smallish long position in Breadtalk, go to the related posts at the end of this blog post (see related post #2).

Starhub. In June last year, when I did a technical analysis for Starhub, I said:

"The widening of the Bollinger Bands indicates increased volatility. The OBV shows selling pressure. The MACD is declining and shows no sign of a positive divergence. These are all on the weekly chart which suggests that continuing weakness in the longer term should not surprise us." Read blog post: here.


We saw Starhub's stock price sinking and I nibbled  again in late November. I feel that Mr. Market is right to be concerned but might be overly pessimistic about Starhub's prospects with the introduction of a 4th telco.

There is plenty of speculation now but, to be realistic, it will take time for the new entrant (which is expected to enter the market in 2018) to gain traction and it remains to be seen how successful it will be.




Back in June 2015, I also said that SPH and Starhub were similar:

"They could see earnings come under pressure for different reasons but that makes them similar too as the challenges are very real.... I would like to have some buffer in terms of dividend yield buying into SPH and Starhub because I am investing in them primarily for income and not growth." Read blog post: here.

I believe I am getting a much thicker cushion buying Starhub at under $2.80 a share and that was what I did.

As for SPH, let me share here a recent conversation with a reader:

I have been a SPH shareholder for many years and I am happy enough to be paid while I wait.
---------------------
As this turned out to be a very long blog post, I chopped it up into two parts. Read Part 2: HERE.
Related posts:

1. 1H 2016 income from non-REITs.

2. Breadtalk, OCK and QAF.

3. Made $1m investing for income.
4. 2016 FY income from S-REITs.

2015 full year income from non-REITs.

Before I reveal the numbers, let me talk to myself about what I did in 4Q 2015, investments wise.

I re-initiated a long position in ARA as I felt that its stock price declined to a reasonably attractive level. 

ARA's rights issue which followed not long after was unexpected but I took up my entitlement and applied for excess rights as I looked at it as an opportunity to buy more on the cheap. I will probably buy more if the stock declines further in price.

Of course, those who follow my blog will also remember another rights issue and that was by Croesus Retail Trust. I too participated fully in that rights issue.

A back of the envelope calculation shows that Croesus Retail Trust is now trading at a 10% distribution yield. 

Croesus Retail Trust has rather high gearing level but if we were to take that away, Croesus Retail Trust is actually still generating more than a 5% distribution yield (i.e. non-leveraged yield) which I think is very attractive for a portfolio of mostly freehold retail properties in Japan. 

As the Trust's unit price declined, I added to my position again in the middle of December at 78c a unit.

I also increased my investment in Accordia Golf Trust as its stock price declined. The last time I did this was in mid-December at 51c a unit.

Investing in Accordia Golf Trust, we must realise that weather plays an important part in its performance. So, we have to expect its revenue to fluctuate quite a bit seasonally, much like investing in hospitality REITs.

With sentiments pretty negative, if Mr. Market were to offer me meaningfully lower prices, I would probably be buying more.

I also did a bit of trading in 4Q 2015. I reduced my long positions in Wilmar and ST Engineering as their stock prices recovered. That gave me some trading gains for the quarter.

I don't trade very much anymore as it requires a bit more work. Now, I might not even look at the stock market for several days in a row.

I added to my long position again in ST Engineering as its stock price declined by more than 10% from my recent selling price. 


ST Engineering is still one investment for income and growth. I definitely want to buy more if Mr. Market goes into a depression.

For those who do not follow my comments section, I initiated a smallish long position in DBS. Some know that I have been thinking of buying into the three local banks for a while and have been waiting for their stock prices to become cheaper.

I chose DBS first because it was trading at the smallest premium to NAV compared to OCBC and UOB. There is also consensus that DBS would be the biggest beneficiary of rising interest rates.

I also added to my investment in SingTel as its stock price declined. We invest in SingTel, Starhub and M1 because they are defensive income generators but with SingTel, there is also a nice element of growth.

Finally, I added to my long position in APTT this month after having left it alone since its inception. The rapid plunge in APTT's unit price up till middle of December seemed excessive to me even though I have mentioned before that a DPU of 8c a year is unsustainable in the longer run.


A much lower DPU of between 4c to 5c would probably be more sustainable for APTT. So, adding to my long position at 63c a unit, I am expecting a more realistic distribution yield of 6.3% to 7.9%.


A more recent development was an expression of interest by a party to acquire Ascendas Hospitality Trust which I included in my income portfolio in 3Q 2014. I have added to my investment on a few occasions since then, as and when its unit price declined.

The last time I increased exposure to Ascendas Hospitality Trust was on 24 August 2015 at 58.5c a unit. With an estimated annual DPU of 5.5c, I was looking at a distribution yield of almost 10%.

Although I hope that the offer is going to be at a fairly attractive premium to valuation, I am aware that if the Trust should be taken private, my income from non-REITs next year would take a hit.

Very safe to show hand like this.

Including my first income distribution from Religare Health Trust (RHT), dividends from my investments in non-REITs in Q4 brings my income in 2015 from them to a grand total of S$76,804.69.

This works out to be about S$6,400.00 a month.

Including the distributions from S-REITs this year, I am pretty satisfied with the total income generated by my investment portfolio.


Related post:
1. ARA: Re-initiating long position.
2. Croesus Retail Trust: Rights.
3. Trading ST Engineering.
4. Religare Health Trust: Entered at 88c.
5. 9M 2015 income from non-REITs.

9M 2015 passive income from non-REITs.

Some wonder if Mr. Market could go into a depression? I don't know but I do know that many stocks became much more attractively priced in the last three months.

Consistent with my strategy to diversify my portfolio to reduce reliance on S-REITs for income, I added to my long positions in the following as their stock prices declined more significantly recently:

1. Accordia Golf Trust

2. Ascendas Hospitality Trust

3. ST Engineering

4. Starhub

5. SembCorp Industries

In the last three months, I also initiated long positions in the following as investments for income:

5. VICOM
"A 15x PE ratio would give us a fair value of $5.36 or so per share."

6. Religare Health Trust
"Trust has demonstrated its ability to improve its revenue organically quite strongly which makes up for the expiration of the sponsor's waiver to their share of the distributable income."

7. King Wan
"King Wan is in a net cash position and it also has an order book that would provide earnings visibility until 2018."

Finally, I accumulated the following stocks which have a bit of an income investing angle but the main reason is because I think they are worth much more and at lower prices, they became even more attractive:

8. Wilmar

9. OUE Limited

If you should be interested, you could search ASSI for more of my blog posts on these stocks and why I decided to add them to my portfolio when I did.

Of course, stocks could stay undervalued for a long time but regularly receiving some dividend in the meantime makes the waiting more palatable. I like to be paid while I wait.

If you suspect that I have dipped into my war chest in the last three months, you are right. 

Could we see another big decline in the stock market? We could and we should be ready. So, being cautious, I have not exhausted my war chest.

I have a couple of fixed deposits maturing next month in October and I will probably be keeping the money close at hand instead of putting it in another fixed deposit or two.

In Q3 2015, the following non-REITs paid dividends:

1. SATS

2. Old Chang Kee

3. APTT

4. SingTel

5. SCI

6. SMM

7. Wilmar

8. NeraTel

9. ST Engineering

10. QAF Ltd.

11. Starhub

12. HongLeong Finance

13. Croesus Retail Trust

For the first 9 months of 2015, total passive income received from non-REITs: S$ 57,747.59. 

This works out to be S$ 6,416.40 per month.

Have a shopping list and be ready to pounce if Mr. Market becomes depressed.

Related post:

6M 2015 passive income from non-REITs.

Spotting the next OSIM?

This is freshly taken from TheFinance's wall in FB. I made a few comments and I think this is substantial enough to share with readers who do not follow me on FB:

I have to go out in a while.

Have a good Sunday, everyone.

Related posts:
Managing exposure in investment portfolio.

A strategy to grow wealth and augment income (2013).

I am primarily investing for income and in my last blog post, in what has become a yearly practice, I revealed my full year income from S-REITs as well as how they fit into my investment strategy. They are relevant to income investors but with the spectre of rising interest rates in the years ahead as well as a peaking in the real estate cycle here, it is sensible not to be overly optimistic about S-REITs in general.

So, apart from a large purchase made in Saizen REIT in the middle of 2012, I have devoted most of my resources to stocks. These should be undervalued and are likely to continue growing for years to come. Since I want to have income from my investments, I would also like for these stocks to pay dividends.

Marco Polo Marine's yard in Batam.

Now, with these stocks, the main strategy is to buy and hold. However, I am not averse to trading around my investments. So, I could divest partially or fully if it is a good idea to do so. For 9M 2013, I revealed that I locked in gains of S$188,625.13. Has the number changed?

Well, I mentioned that I partially divested my investment in Sabana REIT last month. This added S$12,860.03 to gains from trading in 2013.

So, total trading gains in 2013 is S$201,485.16.

What about adding to my long positions?

What I hope to do primarily is to identify good companies, initiate long positions in them at fairly good prices and then wait to add to these positions if there should be bad news which send their share prices down. These are companies which I am comfortable to stay invested in for years, knowing that they possess some competitive advantages which differentiate them.

Warren Buffett famously said that we should invest with the thought that the stock market could close the next day and not reopen for five years. What does this mean?

Invest in stocks of companies which we are confident will do better over the next five years. We wouldn't be bothered by any volatility in their stock prices in the meantime unless it is to add to our long positions with greater margins of safety. If we understand this, we will know what stocks to avoid. How? Do an inversion.


With this in mind, in the last three months, I added to my long positions in NeraTel and Yongnam as their share prices declined due to bad news which I believe are neither long term nor recurring in nature. I have received fairly good dividends from these stocks and I also made some money trading these stocks earlier in the year.

I also added to my long position in SPH. I was paid both the special dividend and the year end dividend for this as well.

Marco Polo Marine is still my single largest investment although its share price has not declined significantly enough for me to add to my long position. The much higher dividend per share paid out recently was a bonus.

I also retain long positions in CapitaMalls Asia and Wilmar International. These are strong companies and leaders in their fields. They are likely to do better in future.

So, was anything new added to my portfolio?

I initiated a long position in Croesus Retail Trust and even added to this position by using funds freed from a partial divestment of Sabana REIT.

Wait a minute? Didn't I say that I am wary of rising interest rates and a possible peaking of the real estate cycle? Yes, I did but Croesus Retail Trust owns malls in Japan and the BOJ is bent on keeping interest rates really low. Abenomics demand this. The Trust has a relatively low cost of debt which is locked in for 5 years.

Luz Shinsaibashi.

Japan has also suffered from continual deflation for 20 years. If anything, the real estate cycle should have a greater chance of bottoming than peaking. Anecdotal evidence tells of a recovering real estate market in recent months that is likely to pick up speed in future.

Although my strategy, with a generous dose of luck, has worked well this year, I can only hope that it will continue to work in the new year.

To grow wealth and augment income? Yes, indeed, that is the plan.

Related posts:
1. 2013 full year income from S-REITs.
2. Yongnam: Substantial shareholder increased stake.
3. NeraTel: Added to my long position.
4. Marco Polo Marine: Exciting times ahead.

9M 2013 income from S-REITs and more.

Three more months to the end of the year. Lots of things have happened in the first 9 months of the year. I want to zoom in on the investment front and record some of my thoughts.

The strategy to be invested in S-REITs for income is still working. Of course, with the spectre of the Fed cutting back on QE and a possible increase in interest rates in the next 2 or 3 years, Mr. Market has turned cautious on leveraged investments like S-REITs. This is only natural. Unit prices of S-REITs have become more realistic as a result.

When Mr. Market is pessimistic, that is when we are likely to get good deals. As to what is a good deal, I am sure this is rather subjective. Every person would have a different idea of what is an acceptable margin of safety. Every person would have a different perception of a REIT's prospects.

Having built up a relatively large portfolio of S-REITs, I devoted more resources to investing in what I believe are undervalued stocks, something which I continue to do in 2013.

So, essentially, what I have done is to keep what has worked well for me thus far while expanding my investments in certain companies, recognising possibly more difficult times ahead for S-REITs. 

This is an approach that requires more work than simply getting passive income from S-REITs but the time when it was a no-brainer to buy and hold S-REITs probably ended sometime in the second half of 2012.

For 9M 2013, how much did I receive in passive income from S-REITs? 

$92,872.65

Full year 2013 income from S-REITs is most likely going to be lower compared to 2012 because I sold a significant portion of my investment in LMIR earlier this year and also because Saizen REIT distributes income half yearly (i.e. there is no income distribution in December from Saizen REIT).

Also, we might want to bear in mind that, although hedged, the weaker Indonesian Rupiah and Japanese Yen could result in lower income distributions in S$ terms for unit holders of these REITs in the year 2014.

With twice as much industrial space being scheduled for completion in 2014 and 2015 than any single year in the past decade, the possibility of stagnating or even a reduction in income for industrial S-REITs in future cannot be discounted. This is why looking at WALE (Weighted Average Lease Expiry) of industrial S-REITs is more important now.

Although I would have liked nothing better than to sit back and collect passive income regularly from S-REITs, doing very little else, I decided to move out of my comfort zone. For sure, there were bumps along the way but my efforts have generally been rewarding thus far. 

What did I do?

I increased my investments in stocks which are likely to be dependable passive income generators such as SPH and NeraTel. 

I also hold long positions in stocks which I believe would benefit from the Chinese consumption story such as CapitaMalls Asia, PCRT and Wilmar. 

Any dividend from investing in these stocks and any gain from trading would go towards cushioning the possible decline in income from S-REITs in future.

Up to 15 September 2013, the total gain from trading this year amounts to: 

$188,625.13

It was fortuitous the way the China Minzhong saga turned out. It preserved my trading gains and grew it rather significantly at the same time. Apart from my long position in Wilmar, all other investments are in the black. 

So, what is my plan for the future? 

Nothing profound really. 

If prices were to decline much more, I hope I would be brave enough to buy more. If prices were to rise much more, I hope I would remember to sell some.

The grand scheme is to augment and not to replace my passive income portfolio. 

For sure, it doesn't mean that I think S-REITs are going the way of the Dodo. Indeed, they are still good investments for income at the right prices. For me, passive income from S-REITs will still be an important pillar in achieving financial freedom. This is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.

Remember, this blog is not meant to instruct but if anyone finds it inspiring, I will be happy enough.

Related posts:
1. 2012 full year income from S-REITs.
2. Never lose money in real estate and S-REITs?
3. Do not love unless it is worth the loving.
4. Motivations and methods in investing.
5. Be cautious climbing the S-REIT tree.
6. Be comfortable with being invested.

Tea with Mike: Approach to stock selection

There are many ways of selecting stocks. Some people use ratios such as PER and P/B. Some people look at charts, spotting 52 weeks highs and lows. Some look for the highest yields. The list goes on. When I first started, I felt overwhelmed and didn’t really know what to look for.

Over the years, I adopted an approach that is similar to Graham's “large companies that are out-of favour” tactic. I look at alpha cyclical companies during their down cycles and I believed that will offer some margin of safety.

I bought into 2 counters, Golden Agri and YZJ, using this approach. For shipping industry, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) hit record bottom at 661 last year. The peak was 11,000. Even if one were to take the average, we can quite safely say the BDI was nowhere near where it would be mid-cycle. Shipping down cycle is characterized by a dearth of new shipbuilding orders, collapse of freight rates, and the bankruptcies of weaker players, and all these have happened in the past 1 year. So, I can safely conclude that we are near the trough of a down cycle. Near? Yes, because there is no way to ascertain if we have reached the bottom yet.

Then, we search for alpha companies. These are companies in the sector that have the strongest financial strength and operating efficiency. This is so that our investment does not go to the dogs and get consumed by the down cycle. I shall not go into detail about YZJ, as that itself would be a long blog but, particularly, I looked out for a low gearing level.

Both Golden Agri and YZJ have low gearing levels. More important is the amount of short term loans to be repaid. Down cycles combined with the maturity of large loans is what killed many companies. Even the biggest private shipyard in China, Rongsheng, is facing severe difficulties because of this.

Next, while profits would be affected negatively, there should not be losses, and the companies should be big enough to show resilience in earnings through previous crises. There should be Free Cash Flow (FCF) in most of the operating years too

Golden Agri’s earnings are levered heavily on Crude Palm Oil's (CPO) price, and its production levels. If we look at the last 30 years, 2013 has seen CPO price falling more than 40% from its last peak. Although inventory has been piling up, Golden Agri will not be able to increase its production at the same rate it has been able to in the past. I bought it for its vertically integrated businesses and its economies of scale. For higher production growth, one should, perhaps, look at First Resources.

This approach requires a lot of patience as the sectors are out of favour and there is very little chance that the share prices would shoot up suddenly. Also, as AK always says, cheap could get cheaper and this is especially true in such out of favor stocks. Say ship building and most people would frown. So, there might be selling pressure from time to time but if the companies are fundamentally strong, such selling pressure provides opportunities for accumulation.

I would like to acknowledge that I first got some ideas and information from Calvin Yeo of "Invest In Passive Income". A link to his blog can be found in the left side bar of AK's blog.

-------------------

AK's comment:

I was heavily invested in Golden Agriculture at one time, recognising that it was heavily levered to the price of CPO. When CPO price was rising relentlessly, Golden Agriculture was a good investment. I made a tidy sum from it. Mike's approach is valid, I am sure, but one has to be patient.

We could consider investing in Wilmar International which also has an exposure to CPO but it is less levered to CPO production which forms less than a fifth of its earnings. Wilmar has a pretty diversified earnings base. However, if we are looking for positive Free Cash Flow, then, Wilmar would fail our selection process.

As for ship builders, I would also frown when I hear the phrase. However, we can find nuggets in the sector and when we look at what Cosco and YZJ are doing, we know where to look because these yards are venturing into building for the O&G industry. This is what KepCorp and SembCorp have been doing for years. With more rigs delivered, there is a higher need for OSVs and, yes, I am invested in Marco Polo Marine which has the added advantage of a strong moat. However, if we are looking for positive Free Cash Flow, then, Marco Polo Marine would fail the selection process too.

I believe that Mike's approach is probably suitable for anyone who is more conservative since stronger companies in cyclical industries are unlikely to go bust in a down cycle. When the up cycle returns, these companies should lead the recovery.

Thanks, Mike, for offering us your perspective on stock selection. It has provided me with food for thought.